What's new

Pak submarine "PNS Ghazi" disaster in 1971 remains a mystery

. .
& also from the Investigation report of Sindhurakshak.

“the crew was working beyond their prescribed hours. Fatigue and exhaustion may have triggered human error that led to the accident. Standard operating procedures were violated at several levels.” [50]
 
.
& also from the Investigation report of Sindhurakshak.

“the crew was working beyond their prescribed hours. Fatigue and exhaustion may have triggered human error that led to the accident. Standard operating procedures were violated at several levels.” [50]
so u assume its similar for ghazi?
try coherent speech instead of LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO
 
. .
More on Ghazi:

The only information on the subject from an independent source comes from an Egyptian naval officer serving at that time on an Egyptian submarine under refit in the harbor. He has confirmed the occurrence of a powerful explosion in the vicinity of the harbor late at night. There were no naval ships, as reported by this officer, outside the harbor at that time and it was not until about an hour after the explosion that two Indian naval ships were observed leaving harbor.
Source: pg 6
http://ussseaowl.com/PDFFolder/Newsletter12-2007.pdf

From your same source (PDF file) you attached (pg 06):

"Another more plausible theory is that the explosive shock from one of the depth charges set off the torpedoes and mines (some of which may have been armed for laying) stored aboard the submarine"
 
.
According to the Pakistani Navy:

PNS Ghazi commenced laying a small minefield east of the Vishakapatnam harbor mouth on the overnight of 2-3 December 1971. Then at daybreak on 3 December, it headed out to deeper water to search for the INS Vikrant battle group. Not finding it, PNS Ghazi returned to the Vishakapatnam harbor mouth area at sunset to resume laying the minefield. As the lights ashore were blacked out, PNS Ghazi may have misjudged her position and doubled back into her own minefield around midnight; about 10-15 minutes before the INS Rajput depth charging. Thus, it was the accidental detonation of its own mines that destroyed the Ghazi and not INS Rajput‘s depth charges.

Over the years, the mystery surrounding the sinking of PNS Ghazi has endured. Today, the submarine lies embedded in the Vizag seabed about 1.5 nautical miles from the breakwaters. Close to the harbour channel, the spot has been marked on navigational maps to help ships avoid the wreck.

Vice Admiral (retd) G M Hiranandani (whose book, Transition to Triumph, gives a detailed history of the Indian Navy) says, “The truth about the Ghazi, which remains on what the submarine community calls the ‘eternal parole’, lies somewhere between the Indian and Pakistani versions of the sinking but no one knows exactly where.”

hell lot of story, PAK Navy trying to tell every SUB move like the SUB commander keep telling them live ....lol

SUB was under radio silence and no way PN can know what is sub doing or Its move. or decision taken by its Commander, PN can only tell the objective.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/INS_Sindhurakshak_(S63)

"an accident or inadvertent mishandling of ammunition was the cause of the explosions"

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL height of inexperienced ch...yapa
lol, yea that happened at the time of loading n due to particular , accidents under water is rare...
 
. . . .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom