Pak cites shifting geography, lays claim to part of creek on India side

[Secur]

the only thing you will take is lives of your soldiers like you did in siachen...so be a smarty pants and stay the hell away from our territories

Ironically , IA has lost more lives in Siachin than their Pakistani counterparts , kiddo

We already took Rann of Kutch in '65 while Indians ran for their lives ...

 

[Skull and Bones]

Pakistan is claiming whole indian occupied Kashmir not only creek area....

BTW never seen this claim in any Pakistani media....
india media rocks...

Pakistani media is busy fabricating fake wikileaks propaganda.

Happy leaking.

 

[Secur]

Pakistani media is busy fabricating fake wikileaks propaganda.

Happy leaking.

There isn't a Pakistani source reporting this very news ... Of course the news would sell well in India ...

Obsessed people

 

[karan.1970]

Ironically , IA has lost more lives in Siachin than their Pakistani counterparts , kiddo

Not surprising since India holds the siachen heights and Pakistani Army is mostly on the foothills after being pushed out of the region in 1984-87..

 

[Secur]

Not surprising since India holds the siachen heights and Pakistani Army is mostly on the foothills after being pushed out of the region in 1984-87..

Not surprising since there was no war on Siachin ... The IA simply got there first and even then we managed to take control of Gyong La so your presence poses no threat to Skardu and KKH ... IA cant come down and fight ... Being pushed out would mean that PA was in control of Siachin before IA fought and took it over ...

 

[kingkobra]

Ironically , IA has lost more lives in Siachin than their Pakistani counterparts , kiddo

We already took Rann of Kutch in '65 while Indians ran for their lives ...

that is prize we have to pay for having a terrorist nation as our neighbor...
and lets not talk about 1965 war we all know what happened with your patton tanks we have a small area named after your cowardliness known as patton angar

 

[Carl Johnson]

Ironically , IA has lost more lives in Siachin than their Pakistani counterparts , kiddo

We already took Rann of Kutch in '65 while Indians ran for their lives ...

Is this a joke?If it is,you failed miserably.Do you even know where rann of kutch is or how big it is?Enlighten us on this matter with some proof and if you cant,STFU!!!

Its just like saying India captured Pakistani punjab in 1965 while pakistanis ran for there lives.

 

[Secur]

that is prize we have to pay for having a terrorist nation as our neighbor...
and lets not talk about 1965 war we all know what happened with your patton tanks we have a small area named after your cowardliness known as patton angar

Likewise , we have Chawinda ...

 

[IND151]

^^ he has edited post means he realized he was wrong

on topic> GOI will remain firm on its stand

this claim wont affect current stand of GOI on Siachin

 

[kingkobra]

Is this a joke?If it is,you failed miserably.Do you even know where rann of kutch is or how big it is?Enlighten us on this matter with some proof and if you cant,STFU!!!

Its just like saying India captured Pakistani punjab in 1965 while pakistanis ran for there lives.

and they celebrate it as defence day

 

[neutral_person]

Pakistan can claim all it wants. They didnt even get Kashmir after 65 years of "claiming" and now they are moving on to new lands already

 

[Secur]

Is this a joke?If it is,you failed miserably.Do you even know where rann of kutch is or how big it is?Enlighten us on this matter with some proof and if you cant,STFU!!! Its just like saying India captured Pakistani punjab in 1965 while pakistanis ran for there lives.

Learn to debate with civility ... This ai'nt no BR **** going on here ...

In June 1965, British Prime Minister Harold Wilson successfully persuaded both countries to end hostilities and set up a tribunal to resolve the dispute. The verdict, which came later in 1968, saw Pakistan awarded 350 square miles (900 km²) of the Rann of Kutch [17]


Rowle Knox, Daily Telegraph, London, May 5, 1965.

I led a party of Pakistani and foreign journalists to the Rann of Kutch area a few days later. After the G.O.C., Major General Tika Khan, had finished briefing the party, one of the foreign journalists got up and asked, "General you say you have killed 300 Indians, the Indians say they have killed 350 Pakistanis. Who would we believe." The General was not perturbed. In his usual cool manner he replied. "I am placing all my helicopters at your disposal. If you see, when you go over the battle area, that the junk of war is in front of me then the Indians are telling the truth, but if the junk of the war is behind me then I alone could be in a position to count the dead." "fair enough" replied the foreign journalist. On his return it was the same journalist who remarked "Gosh - You made them run in the Rann."

The defense of Lahore was successful , If you guys were on the verge of capturing it , why didn't you proceed ? Since your generals wanted to drink at the Gymkhana , Lahore Now do not make the ridiculous claim that a ceasefire was to be announced shortly and the areas would have been to be returned back ... We all know belligerents try to capture as much areas as possible before ceasefire to use as bargaining chips later ...

and they celebrate it as defence day

What does defense mean in your dictionary ? ... We successfully defended our cities while taking control of Rann of Kutch ...

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

The major contention is pakistan is asking full control of navogation channel, which india cant afford to lose..
Many fishermens use it for their livelihood, and naval assets can strategically use them in case of war...
As said in article, we can have a milldle line in the naval boundary, but we wont part fully...
Its not our fault that ur part of land have submerged and moved eastword...

 

[Secur]

The major contention is pakistan is asking full control of navigation channel, which india cant afford to lose.. Many fishermens use it for their livelihood, and naval assets can strategically use them in case of war... As said in article, we can have a milldle line in the naval boundary, but we wont part fully...
Its not our fault that ur part of land have submerged and moved eastword...

What does the International Principle say ?

 

[karan.1970]

What does defense mean in your dictionary ? ... We successfully defended our cities

, certainly an ambitious goal for the country who started the war

In June 1965, British Prime Minister Harold Wilson successfully persuaded both countries to end hostilities and set up a tribunal to resolve the dispute. The verdict, which came later in 1968, saw Pakistan awarded 350 square miles (900 km²) of the Rann of Kutch [17]

Let me complete it for you..

In June 1965, British Prime Minister Harold Wilson successfully persuaded both countries to end hostilities and set up a tribunal to resolve the dispute. The verdict, which came later in 1968, saw Pakistan awarded 350 square miles (900 km²) of the Rann of Kutch, as against its original claim of 3,500 square miles (9,100 km2).[17]

Thats why some Pakistanis quoting without the link is always suspicious

PS: The june 1965 dispute resolution you mention was before the war.. Read before you post to avoid embarrassing yourself.. As they say, its better to stay silent and look foolish, than to speak and remove all doubt about it..