Pak boat 4 persons on boat blew themselves up! After hot pursuit by Coast Guard in Arabian Sea

[SrNair]

If all above shit which indian media and GOV is telling like
1)we intercepted boat near Karachi.
2)break into there communication and was under constant surveillance.
Then why Indian government did not let them come and ambush them and caught one of them alive all indian members over here think yourself if a boat was under surveillance before it left it's home port them it's destination have been known you are on DF act like person with some knowledge of such kind and no mercy for terrorist regardless of nation and religion.
@jbond197 @Sidak @sreekumar

This is not a mock drill or Hollywood action film.

 

[krishnathealien]

Pakistanis always live in denial.. come up with strange stories. Think they have never heard about satellite tracking systems, advanced phone tracing etc.. Our "sky eyes" are always on you friends, Our government have also arranged special status for your citizens who wish to visit India with weapons, Our security forces have given power to issue visas to such people even at sea!.

 

[kaonalpha]

https://twitter.com/x/status/551042567215648768

No entire Pakistan navy is attacking porbandar .What a load of B.S. .Guys seriously

 

[krishnathealien]

Smart of them to carry condoms, indulging in with multiple partners do lead to AIDS.

They never seen condoms, they were taught to use condoms like balloons to land in India. Sad they never knew we have a reception team ready for any visitor from across the border.

 

[SamantK]

How could india fire at a Pakistani boat 365 km out at sea? It was in international waters not Indian territorial waters.

Plus look at the "explosives laden" boat. Its compleyely intact after so called "bomb blasts".


View attachment 180594

How could india fire at a Pakistani boat 365 km out at sea? It was in international waters not Indian territorial waters.

Plus look at the "explosives laden" boat. Its compleyely intact after so called "bomb blasts".


View attachment 180594

It was mentioned in the statement that the crew of the boat first set it on fire.. Timesnow says that those pictures are from a few minutes before it blew up...

 

[karan.1970]

@karan.1970 Another glorious victory. Very sshupa, much powa.

Very unbecoming of a moderator, but meh...

 

[Matrixx]

How could india fire at a Pakistani boat 365 km out at sea? It was in international waters not Indian territorial waters.

Plus look at the "explosives laden" boat. Its compleyely intact after so called "bomb blasts".


View attachment 180594

How could india fire at a Pakistani boat 365 km out at sea? It was in international waters not Indian territorial waters.

Plus look at the "explosives laden" boat. Its compleyely intact after so called "bomb blasts".


View attachment 180594

These picture before blast....terrorist burned the boat first later blasted it.....keep denying India dont care....proper massage is gone to the world.....it is all damage to Pakistan not India

 

[ares]

How could india fire at a Pakistani boat 365 km out at sea? It was in international waters not Indian territorial waters.

Plus look at the "explosives laden" boat. Its compleyely intact after so called "bomb blasts".


View attachment 180594

How could india fire at a Pakistani boat 365 km out at sea? It was in international waters not Indian territorial waters.

Plus look at the "explosives laden" boat. Its compleyely intact after so called "bomb blasts".


View attachment 180594

Who said India fired on the boat..a warning shot was fired across the bow and not on the boat.

.It was boat crew itself who lit the boat on fire in attempt to evade capture and destroy all evidence.

The Boat was in Indian EEZ (which extends to 200 NM or 370 Kms from Indian coast)...and India has right to inspect, confesticate or even sink any vessel deemed a threat to our national security.

 

[shaheenmissile]

It was mentioned in the statement that the crew of the boat first set it on fire.. Timesnow says that those pictures are from a few minutes before it blew up...

lies and more lies.

 

[kaonalpha]

Who said India fired on the boat..a warning shot was fired across the bow and not on the boat.

.It was boat crew itself who lit the boat on fire in attempt to evade capture and destroy all evidence.

The Boat was in Indian EEZ (which extends to 200 NM or 370 Kms from Indian coast)...and India has right to inspect, confesticate or even sink any vessel deemed a threat to our national security.

So you were there when the incident happend?

 

[shaheenmissile]

Who said India fired on the boat..a warning shot was fired across the bow and not on the boat.

.It was boat crew itself who lit the boat on fire in attempt to evade capture and destroy all evidence.

The Boat was in Indian EEZ (which extends to 200 NM or 370 Kms from Indian coast)...and India has right to inspect, confesticate or even sink any vessel deemed a threat to our national security.

territorial sea is 12nm not 200

Definition of EEZ is here..No right to inspect any vessels.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Sea areas in international rights
An exclusive economic zone (EEZ) is a sea zone prescribed by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea over which a state has special rights regarding the exploration and use of marine resources, including energy production from water and wind.[1] It stretches from the baseline out to 200 nautical miles (nmi) from its coast. In colloquial usage, the term may include the continental shelf. The term does not include either the territorial sea or the continental shelf beyond the 200 nmi limit. The difference between the territorial sea and the exclusive economic zone is that the first confers full sovereignty over the waters, whereas the second is merely a "sovereign right" which refers to the coastal state's rights below the surface of the sea. The surface waters, as can be seen in the map, are international waters.[2

 

[Jungibaaz]

Very unbecoming of a moderator, but meh...

Was the quality to your dissatisfaction?

 

[ares]

territorial sea is 12nm not 200

And EEZ is 200 NM.

 

[acid rain]

Good job by the Indian coast guard.

 

[shaheenmissile]

And EEZ is 200 NM.

Read this

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Sea areas in international rights
An exclusive economic zone (EEZ) is a sea zone prescribed by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea over which a state has special rights regarding the exploration and use of marine resources, including energy production from water and wind.[1] It stretches from the baseline out to 200 nautical miles (nmi) from its coast. In colloquial usage, the term may include the continental shelf. The term does not include either the territorial sea or the continental shelf beyond the 200 nmi limit. The difference between the territorial sea and the exclusive economic zone is that the first confers full sovereignty over the waters, whereas the second is merely a "sovereign right" which refers to the coastal state's rights below the surface of the sea. The surface waters, as can be seen in the map, are international waters.[2