What's new

Pak Army and Nepal (Gurkhas)

lol as i said indian wet dreams :lol::enjoy:

lol as i said Pakistani wet dreams india today:lol::enjoy:
another poor illiterate indian feeded hatrate against Pakistan i know its not you, whole indian nationalism survive on Pakistan hate. keep it up and keep frustrated with all these threads and keep annoying all neighbors so that the love for Pakistan among masses increases:lol:

another poor illiterate Pakistani feeded hatrate against non-Muslims i know its not you, whole Pakistani nationalism survive on hindu hate. keep it up and keep frustrated with all these threads and keep annoying all neighbors so that the love for India among masses increases:lol:
 
Ya that's why there are millions of north easters are living in south Indian silicon vally .

Just because they live in India doesn't mean they like India...They are there just for bread and butter...Don't think they're loyal to India...

Only North Indian Brahmin are loyal to India to the core....rest lies in between.

#GoHomeIndianMedia: Here's why the Nepalis are mad as hell at Indian press

Has the Indian media collectively jumped the shark?

If Twitter on Sunday was any indication, then the answer is a resounding 'YES'.

Angry Nepalese flocked to Twitter in their numbers, protesting what they have been calling the insensitive, triumphant and jingoistic coverage of the earthquake that devastated the country. End result? #GoHomeIndianMedia was the top trend on Twitter - ironically on press freedom day.


Reuters image

The trend has come as a slap in the face of the journalists who have flocked to the country in a bid to bring 24x7 coverage of the disaster to their respective outlets.

Some including Congress leader Shashi Tharoor have seen it as a wake up call for the industry as a whole.

Our media continues to embarrass&dismay India: http://t.co/mr6BETvLtM Thx2Nepal coverage, #GoHomeIndianMedia trends on WorldPressFreedomDay!

— Shashi Tharoor (@ShashiTharoor) May 3, 2015

Many other Indians, who have no love lost for the Indian media have also jumped on the hashtag and have been tweeting in agreement with the Nepalis.

The complaints are many and they may not all be fully justified. But here are the main reasons that the Nepalis cite for being so furious with the Indian media:

1. Relief work has been used as a PR opportunity for the Indian government

This has been one of the foremost reasons cited by Nepalis tweeting using the hashtag - that while the efforts of the Indian government have been plentiful and widely appreciated, the constant crowing about it by the Indian media has been downright irritating.

It's one of the most basic lessons we learn while growing up. Charity is fine, but constantly reminding the recipient of our charity that we gave it to them, and expecting them to be constantly thankful is really no charity at all.

This tweet probably summed up the sentiment by the Nepalese people best:

This cartoon somewhat explains that why #GoHomeIndianMedia became trending!! pic.twitter.com/zIK3frtF9d

— सूचना घिमिरे ツ (@artless77) May 3, 2015

It's not just Nepal though. The chest thumping and self congratulatory attitude by the Indian media had also caused some discomfort at home.

An article in by Outlook magazine that appeared before the hashtag began trending said, "Four days after the earthquake, Union minister of state for home Kiren Rijiju told Parliament that India had emerged as “a leading nation in disaster response”. While such sentiment is evidently widespread in the Himalayan nation and is obviously gratifying to Indians, the uneasy question being asked is whether India should have been crowing about its relief efforts."

This was also reflected by the fact that #ThankyouPM was trending the day of the earthquake, with all the tweets praising PM Narendra Modi for rushing to the aid of Nepal. At the time, many decried the hashtag as unnecessary and insensitive.

The Prime Minister himself modestly deflected the hashtag:

To all those saying #ThankYouPM- appreciate the sentiment…real thanks should be to our great culture, which teaches us 'Seva Parmo Dharma'.

— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) April 27, 2015

If we want to thank anyone, it should be the 125 crore people of India who have made Nepal's pain their own & extended all help.

— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) April 27, 2015

Modi also thanked the Indian media for 'bravely covering the disaster' but in Nepal, the sentiment has not been reciprocated. See some of the tweets below:

Backlash against media not surprising. Some paraded hyper-nationalism and cheerleadership of @PMOIndia as journalism. #GoHomeIndianMedia

— smruti (@urjourno) May 3, 2015

Here's a classic cartoon by Jug Suraiya & Ajit Ninan that explains #GoHomeIndianMediapic.twitter.com/CKjVJYXrdx

— Dan Husain (@DanHusain) May 3, 2015

2. The coverage itself has been insensitive and sensationalist

The second big criticism of the Indian media is the way in which they are covering the quake. In their rush to bring their tragedy to our television screens and outdo one another, it seems that they are seeking more and more dramatic shots and stories.

Nepali origin writer Sunita Shakya of Nepali origin complained about the phenomenon in a blog she wrote for CNN, titled 'Letter to Indian media'

"Your media and media personnel are acting like they are shooting some kind of family serials. If your media person can reach to the places where the relief supplies have not reached, at this time of crisis can’t they take a first-aid kit or some food supplies with them as well?"

Shakya pointed out that media people were more obsessed with covering the disaster than actually helping saying, "There was of course a cameraman who does not want to miss a second so that a dramatic news could be presented. I think you are a human before you become a media person. As a responsible person, it was your duty to save someone."

This sentiment has also been widely prevalent on Twitter, with one widely retweeted tweet saying that one reporter had repeatedly asked a woman to repeat that she had lost her 10-year-old daughter in the quake. Others said that the reporters had been asking questions like 'how do you feel?' while talking to people who had lost everything in the disaster.

An indian news reporter to a mother who's learnt her only son has been buried under their house. Q. How do you feel? #GoHomeIndianMedia

— Prasanna KC (@KC_Prasanna) May 3, 2015

Wen did freedom of speech became equivalent 2 kicking ppl's emotions & insensitive reporting! #gobackindianmedia#DontComeBackIndianMedia

— Ritika Berry (@Ritikaberry25) May 4, 2015

#DontComeBackIndianMedia when missing dogs become breaking news! pic.twitter.com/B4uzMedDJ9

— Neha (@neha_jpn) May 3, 2015

3. Reporters are getting in the way of relief operations

So not only are the Indian media generally causing heartburn in the minds of watching Nepalis, they are also literally taking up space.

Nepali news site Telegraph Nepalbegins one report with the stinging indictment "There is more myth to India’s support than reality."

It complains that though the Indian relief consignment was one of the first and the biggest, that the Indian forces are more or less working as a transport provider to the media battalion that has accompanied them.

"The Indian Army helicopters are carrying their own media men thus they have few room for the earthquake victims. More than 150 Indian media men are in Nepal to cover the damage done by the massive earthquake. Whereas, the Nepal Army with its limited resources have airlifted more than 400 victims, the Indian Army helicopters have only rescued 118 people. On Tuesday, the Indian helicopters only rescued 32 victims, according to a communiqué issued by the public relations department of the Nepal Army."

This was also echoed by Shakya who said, "Thanks to tons of reporters who came to Nepal from those rescue planes of India, you took a seat where a victim could be transported to hospitals/ health camps. Thanks to you all reporters, you took a seat where a bag of food and supplies could be placed to send to those hardly hit places."

There is also criticism that Indian journalists are interfering in rescue operations, by getting in the way, asking questions and wasting precious time.

All the anger has even prompted the Indian ambassador to Nepal to write an article in the Nepali media, asking the people of the country "not to doubt the intentions of New Delhi".

But some say that the social media anger is not really reflective of the actual situation on the ground.

Kunda Dixit, a veteran journalist and editor of Nepali Times told the Hindustan Times not to read too much into the situation:

"Dixit noted that hordes of journalists who came to Nepal from across the world were highlighting the efforts of their own countries but not many Nepalese have an idea of their coverage since only Indian publications and TV channels are available in the country. "For every negative tweet, there are 10 positive reactions about India's efforts in Nepal. We shouldn't read much into it," he said."

However, one cannot completely ignore the outrage of the over 100,000 tweets that were made using the hashtag.

It reflects the problem of disaster journalism across the world where the victims lose their humanity in the search for eyeballs and headlines. It is a good opportunity for the Indian media, to introspect on how they choose to chase stories, and represent them. It is not the moment to get our hackles up over what can be perceived as ungrateful Nepalis. Instead it is a wake up call that perhaps, we all need to pull together and fix some very real problems with the industry as a whole.

Published Date: May 05, 2015 07:26 am | Updated Date: May 05, 2015 07:28 am

http://www.firstpost.com/world/goho...-are-mad-as-hell-at-indian-press-2225958.html
 
Just because they live in India doesn't mean they like India...They are there just for bread and butter...Don't think they're loyal to India...

Only North Indian Brahmin are loyal to India to the core....rest lies in between.
Aha huh, so after claiming Nepalese hate india you are now claiming 7 states in India hate India.

God you people are so delusional it makes me cringe.

Just because they live in India doesn't mean they like India...They are there just for bread and butter...Don't think they're loyal to India...

Only North Indian Brahmin are loyal to India to the core....rest lies in between.

#GoHomeIndianMedia: Here's why the Nepalis are mad as hell at Indian press

Has the Indian media collectively jumped the shark?

If Twitter on Sunday was any indication, then the answer is a resounding 'YES'.

Angry Nepalese flocked to Twitter in their numbers, protesting what they have been calling the insensitive, triumphant and jingoistic coverage of the earthquake that devastated the country. End result? #GoHomeIndianMedia was the top trend on Twitter - ironically on press freedom day.


Reuters image

The trend has come as a slap in the face of the journalists who have flocked to the country in a bid to bring 24x7 coverage of the disaster to their respective outlets.

Some including Congress leader Shashi Tharoor have seen it as a wake up call for the industry as a whole.

Our media continues to embarrass&dismay India: http://t.co/mr6BETvLtM Thx2Nepal coverage, #GoHomeIndianMedia trends on WorldPressFreedomDay!

— Shashi Tharoor (@ShashiTharoor) May 3, 2015

Many other Indians, who have no love lost for the Indian media have also jumped on the hashtag and have been tweeting in agreement with the Nepalis.

The complaints are many and they may not all be fully justified. But here are the main reasons that the Nepalis cite for being so furious with the Indian media:

1. Relief work has been used as a PR opportunity for the Indian government

This has been one of the foremost reasons cited by Nepalis tweeting using the hashtag - that while the efforts of the Indian government have been plentiful and widely appreciated, the constant crowing about it by the Indian media has been downright irritating.

It's one of the most basic lessons we learn while growing up. Charity is fine, but constantly reminding the recipient of our charity that we gave it to them, and expecting them to be constantly thankful is really no charity at all.

This tweet probably summed up the sentiment by the Nepalese people best:

This cartoon somewhat explains that why #GoHomeIndianMedia became trending!! zIK3frtF9d

— सूचना घिमिरे ツ (@artless77) May 3, 2015

It's not just Nepal though. The chest thumping and self congratulatory attitude by the Indian media had also caused some discomfort at home.

An article in by Outlook magazine that appeared before the hashtag began trending said, "Four days after the earthquake, Union minister of state for home Kiren Rijiju told Parliament that India had emerged as “a leading nation in disaster response”. While such sentiment is evidently widespread in the Himalayan nation and is obviously gratifying to Indians, the uneasy question being asked is whether India should have been crowing about its relief efforts."

This was also reflected by the fact that #ThankyouPM was trending the day of the earthquake, with all the tweets praising PM Narendra Modi for rushing to the aid of Nepal. At the time, many decried the hashtag as unnecessary and insensitive.

The Prime Minister himself modestly deflected the hashtag:

To all those saying #ThankYouPM- appreciate the sentiment…real thanks should be to our great culture, which teaches us 'Seva Parmo Dharma'.

— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) April 27, 2015

If we want to thank anyone, it should be the 125 crore people of India who have made Nepal's pain their own & extended all help.

— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) April 27, 2015

Modi also thanked the Indian media for 'bravely covering the disaster' but in Nepal, the sentiment has not been reciprocated. See some of the tweets below:

Backlash against media not surprising. Some paraded hyper-nationalism and cheerleadership of @PMOIndia as journalism. #GoHomeIndianMedia

— smruti (@urjourno) May 3, 2015

Here's a classic cartoon by Jug Suraiya & Ajit Ninan that explains #GoHomeIndianMediaCKjVJYXrdx

— Dan Husain (@DanHusain) May 3, 2015

2. The coverage itself has been insensitive and sensationalist

The second big criticism of the Indian media is the way in which they are covering the quake. In their rush to bring their tragedy to our television screens and outdo one another, it seems that they are seeking more and more dramatic shots and stories.

Nepali origin writer Sunita Shakya of Nepali origin complained about the phenomenon in a blog she wrote for CNN, titled 'Letter to Indian media'

"Your media and media personnel are acting like they are shooting some kind of family serials. If your media person can reach to the places where the relief supplies have not reached, at this time of crisis can’t they take a first-aid kit or some food supplies with them as well?"

Shakya pointed out that media people were more obsessed with covering the disaster than actually helping saying, "There was of course a cameraman who does not want to miss a second so that a dramatic news could be presented. I think you are a human before you become a media person. As a responsible person, it was your duty to save someone."

This sentiment has also been widely prevalent on Twitter, with one widely retweeted tweet saying that one reporter had repeatedly asked a woman to repeat that she had lost her 10-year-old daughter in the quake. Others said that the reporters had been asking questions like 'how do you feel?' while talking to people who had lost everything in the disaster.

An indian news reporter to a mother who's learnt her only son has been buried under their house. Q. How do you feel? #GoHomeIndianMedia

— Prasanna KC (@KC_Prasanna) May 3, 2015

Wen did freedom of speech became equivalent 2 kicking ppl's emotions & insensitive reporting! #gobackindianmedia#DontComeBackIndianMedia

— Ritika Berry (@Ritikaberry25) May 4, 2015

#DontComeBackIndianMedia when missing dogs become breaking news! B4uzMedDJ9

— Neha (@neha_jpn) May 3, 2015

3. Reporters are getting in the way of relief operations

So not only are the Indian media generally causing heartburn in the minds of watching Nepalis, they are also literally taking up space.

Nepali news site Telegraph Nepalbegins one report with the stinging indictment "There is more myth to India’s support than reality."

It complains that though the Indian relief consignment was one of the first and the biggest, that the Indian forces are more or less working as a transport provider to the media battalion that has accompanied them.

"The Indian Army helicopters are carrying their own media men thus they have few room for the earthquake victims. More than 150 Indian media men are in Nepal to cover the damage done by the massive earthquake. Whereas, the Nepal Army with its limited resources have airlifted more than 400 victims, the Indian Army helicopters have only rescued 118 people. On Tuesday, the Indian helicopters only rescued 32 victims, according to a communiqué issued by the public relations department of the Nepal Army."

This was also echoed by Shakya who said, "Thanks to tons of reporters who came to Nepal from those rescue planes of India, you took a seat where a victim could be transported to hospitals/ health camps. Thanks to you all reporters, you took a seat where a bag of food and supplies could be placed to send to those hardly hit places."

There is also criticism that Indian journalists are interfering in rescue operations, by getting in the way, asking questions and wasting precious time.

All the anger has even prompted the Indian ambassador to Nepal to write an article in the Nepali media, asking the people of the country "not to doubt the intentions of New Delhi".

But some say that the social media anger is not really reflective of the actual situation on the ground.

Kunda Dixit, a veteran journalist and editor of Nepali Times told the Hindustan Times not to read too much into the situation:

"Dixit noted that hordes of journalists who came to Nepal from across the world were highlighting the efforts of their own countries but not many Nepalese have an idea of their coverage since only Indian publications and TV channels are available in the country. "For every negative tweet, there are 10 positive reactions about India's efforts in Nepal. We shouldn't read much into it," he said."

However, one cannot completely ignore the outrage of the over 100,000 tweets that were made using the hashtag.

It reflects the problem of disaster journalism across the world where the victims lose their humanity in the search for eyeballs and headlines. It is a good opportunity for the Indian media, to introspect on how they choose to chase stories, and represent them. It is not the moment to get our hackles up over what can be perceived as ungrateful Nepalis. Instead it is a wake up call that perhaps, we all need to pull together and fix some very real problems with the industry as a whole.

Published Date: May 05, 2015 07:26 am | Updated Date: May 05, 2015 07:28 am

http://www.firstpost.com/world/goho...-are-mad-as-hell-at-indian-press-2225958.html

Meanwhile in NEPAL

India is Nepal's old Best-friend

ARUN BUDHATHOKI
Thursday, June 15,2017

In a recently published article in ‘The Hindu Business Line’ entitled 'China is Nepal's new best friend', the author suggests India deploy its Hindu card to regain the waning friendship and control in Nepal. The author accepts India's shortcomings in its treatment in Nepal but the fact that Nepali leaders decided to opt for a secular country speaks for the author's argument.

The paranoia of India regarding China’s entry into Nepal is true and false. I had recently talked a former Maoist Centre leader and he clearly said that China is inactive and indifferent when it comes in influencing Nepali politick. The new Chinese ambassador Yu Hong is visibly inactive compared to the Indian ambassador Puri. The leader went on to accuse India of meddling with Nepal’s politics and bureaucracy. He boldly said that India doesn’t hesitate to micromanage Nepal and this naked intervention is clear to most Nepalis now. Hence, India is playing a destructive role in pushing Nepal towards China and not the other way around. However, it is true that China is pushing for an active role in Nepal but it’s still trying to figure out the best way to influence, perhaps, economically. The recent signing of One Belt One Road (OBOR) by Nepal is an example of soft power China is exercising. Its effect will only be known after many years.

What India fails to understand at times is that it is indeed Nepal’s old and only best friend. But over the years the leaders of both countries have messed up the relationship. India’s fond for US imperialism has obscured its vision to respect Nepal’s sovereignty. Many experts in Nepal believe that India might have gained independence from the British but it still suffers from post-colonial fever and that reflects in its neighbor policy and diplomacy. This is partly true but on the other hand Nepali leaders are no saints. Their tradition of running to New Delhi for making any decision has discredited them as leaders of an independent country. And it only has complicated the relationship between the two nations.

India’s role in not completing developmental projects in Nepal is evident. Yet the corruption in Nepal should be blamed for that too. If these two nations have failed to strengthen ties on economy, how will it manage to come close because of a religion? The question and answer remains elusive.

The pertaining question of the moment for Nepal is the upcoming second-phase polls on June 29. After Prachanda quit his post, PM Deuba promised to appease Madhesi Morcha so that all parties would participate in the upcoming polls. However, the 40th prime minister has shown signs of inefficiency as Rastriya Janata Party Nepal decided to step out of the second-phase polls, exposing the prime minister to widespread criticism. An indignant citizen tweeted that Deuba was someone who was kicked out from the parliament by the last king of Nepal, Gyanendra Shah, in 2011. Still India has put trust in him by side-lining Madhesis’ plea for constitution amendment prior the upcoming polls.

It appears that India is divided per se regarding Nepal and one section believes India shouldn’t interfere in Nepal’s politics but make sure to not let it go out of its sphere. Another section argues that Nepal should be remade the last Hindu country as it cannot afford to do so. This Shangri-La dream is almost oasis-like and perhaps unattainable given the different between people in the two nations.

Once India understands the divisions within its diplomatic and bureaucratic circle and tries to fix it then only we can hope for a better relationship between the two nations. If not the author’s fear might come true. But let’s not forget that Nepal doesn’t share any commonality with China. Most Nepalis don’t understand Chinese nor they share any values or traditions with the northern neighbor. China is trying to create a bridge but it will take years to make it happen. It’s not impossible though. This is where India should be vigilant about.

Nepalis over the years have gone through unimaginable events: civil war, royal massacre, Maoists joining mainstream politics, new constitution, earthquake, India's second blockade, first local level polls in 19 years, 24-hour power supply and a 7.2 economic growth. All this has happened in every ten years. And no one knows what hold for Nepal in the next decade. But the Himalayan nation is in desperate need for a stable political state with government and prime minister that lasts for 4-5 years. And for that to happen the upcoming polls are important.

Let us not forget that India dismisses any secessionist movement in its soil and it should discourage the same in Nepal. The new alliance between RJPN and secessionist leader C.K. Raut is a fresh warning for these two democratic nations.

India and Nepal share strong cultural ties, have similar religious backgrounds, have fostered cordial relationships in marriage, and can understand each other easily. It would be useful for India to help Nepal in becoming politically and economically stable. When that happens, all misunderstanding will fade away, and India will remain Nepal’s only and oldest best friend. If not, the dragon will inevitably soar high in Nepali skies.

(Arun Budhathoki is Nepal Editor, The Citizen)

The citizen
 
Actually I have travelled to Nepal many time. Nepali people are kind and friendly as a whole. There experiences with Pakistani people is very positive.
The real reasons why they dislike Indians is because when Indians visit (my experience in Nepal as well), they are very loud. Obnoxious, rude withholding poor eating habits. Their women treat the Nepalis badly and men just want to find young Nepali girls for their gratification. If you speak with taxi drivers they literally hate the Indians. They have very positive experience of Pakistanis. I personally had no issues with Nepalis during my many visits. There is a small amount of tension between Muslims and Hindus but nothing major
 
Aha huh, so after claiming Nepalese hate india you are now claiming 7 states in India hate India.

God you people are so delusional it makes me cringe.



Meanwhile in NEPAL

India is Nepal's old Best-friend

ARUN BUDHATHOKI
Thursday, June 15,2017

In a recently published article in ‘The Hindu Business Line’ entitled 'China is Nepal's new best friend', the author suggests India deploy its Hindu card to regain the waning friendship and control in Nepal. The author accepts India's shortcomings in its treatment in Nepal but the fact that Nepali leaders decided to opt for a secular country speaks for the author's argument.

The paranoia of India regarding China’s entry into Nepal is true and false. I had recently talked a former Maoist Centre leader and he clearly said that China is inactive and indifferent when it comes in influencing Nepali politick. The new Chinese ambassador Yu Hong is visibly inactive compared to the Indian ambassador Puri. The leader went on to accuse India of meddling with Nepal’s politics and bureaucracy. He boldly said that India doesn’t hesitate to micromanage Nepal and this naked intervention is clear to most Nepalis now. Hence, India is playing a destructive role in pushing Nepal towards China and not the other way around. However, it is true that China is pushing for an active role in Nepal but it’s still trying to figure out the best way to influence, perhaps, economically. The recent signing of One Belt One Road (OBOR) by Nepal is an example of soft power China is exercising. Its effect will only be known after many years.

What India fails to understand at times is that it is indeed Nepal’s old and only best friend. But over the years the leaders of both countries have messed up the relationship. India’s fond for US imperialism has obscured its vision to respect Nepal’s sovereignty. Many experts in Nepal believe that India might have gained independence from the British but it still suffers from post-colonial fever and that reflects in its neighbor policy and diplomacy. This is partly true but on the other hand Nepali leaders are no saints. Their tradition of running to New Delhi for making any decision has discredited them as leaders of an independent country. And it only has complicated the relationship between the two nations.

India’s role in not completing developmental projects in Nepal is evident. Yet the corruption in Nepal should be blamed for that too. If these two nations have failed to strengthen ties on economy, how will it manage to come close because of a religion? The question and answer remains elusive.

The pertaining question of the moment for Nepal is the upcoming second-phase polls on June 29. After Prachanda quit his post, PM Deuba promised to appease Madhesi Morcha so that all parties would participate in the upcoming polls. However, the 40th prime minister has shown signs of inefficiency as Rastriya Janata Party Nepal decided to step out of the second-phase polls, exposing the prime minister to widespread criticism. An indignant citizen tweeted that Deuba was someone who was kicked out from the parliament by the last king of Nepal, Gyanendra Shah, in 2011. Still India has put trust in him by side-lining Madhesis’ plea for constitution amendment prior the upcoming polls.

It appears that India is divided per se regarding Nepal and one section believes India shouldn’t interfere in Nepal’s politics but make sure to not let it go out of its sphere. Another section argues that Nepal should be remade the last Hindu country as it cannot afford to do so. This Shangri-La dream is almost oasis-like and perhaps unattainable given the different between people in the two nations.

Once India understands the divisions within its diplomatic and bureaucratic circle and tries to fix it then only we can hope for a better relationship between the two nations. If not the author’s fear might come true. But let’s not forget that Nepal doesn’t share any commonality with China. Most Nepalis don’t understand Chinese nor they share any values or traditions with the northern neighbor. China is trying to create a bridge but it will take years to make it happen. It’s not impossible though. This is where India should be vigilant about.

Nepalis over the years have gone through unimaginable events: civil war, royal massacre, Maoists joining mainstream politics, new constitution, earthquake, India's second blockade, first local level polls in 19 years, 24-hour power supply and a 7.2 economic growth. All this has happened in every ten years. And no one knows what hold for Nepal in the next decade. But the Himalayan nation is in desperate need for a stable political state with government and prime minister that lasts for 4-5 years. And for that to happen the upcoming polls are important.

Let us not forget that India dismisses any secessionist movement in its soil and it should discourage the same in Nepal. The new alliance between RJPN and secessionist leader C.K. Raut is a fresh warning for these two democratic nations.

India and Nepal share strong cultural ties, have similar religious backgrounds, have fostered cordial relationships in marriage, and can understand each other easily. It would be useful for India to help Nepal in becoming politically and economically stable. When that happens, all misunderstanding will fade away, and India will remain Nepal’s only and oldest best friend. If not, the dragon will inevitably soar high in Nepali skies.

(Arun Budhathoki is Nepal Editor, The Citizen)

The citizen

What I know is that Nepal is not the same for India as it used to be before blockade...

Nepalis love for Pakistan is enough to piss off Indians...
 
What I know is that Nepal is not the same for India as it used to be before blockade...

Nepalis love for Pakistan is enough to piss off Indians...
Listening so a Pakistani claim Nepalese love them is hilarious , there are plenty of news videos of them bad mouthing Pakistan. Just last month Pakistani ceasefire violation killed 3 Nepali gurkha soliders.

I thought that point was clear when your isi spy disappeared in Nepal.both militaries have a codependency pact , from arms to troops to intel
 
Listening so a Pakistani claim Nepalese love them is hilarious , there are plenty of news videos of them bad mouthing Pakistan. Just last month Pakistani ceasefire violation killed 3 Nepali gurkha soliders.

I thought that point was clear when your isi spy disappeared in Nepal.both militaries have a codependency pact , from arms to troops to intel

I got a personal experience from my CA class

  • These Nepalis take every sort of benefits India provide them, yet they abuse India while living in India.
  • This is not because of current India or Nepal Government, this is from a long time.
  • As of Pakistan, they indirectly support Pakistan but since they are dependent on India, they obviously don’t claim it openly. There was some Pak VS WI match, which Pak lost. The reaction of that Nepalese student next day was like someone has given him a beating of his life.
  • If you are in Nepal, people some way or the other will disrespect you for sure if they find you as Indian. (Personal experience of my friend) Nepal is a no-visit country for Indians if your self respect is above anything, or you cannot take up insults.
India should close open borders, send all Nepalis back to Nepal and should ask them to apply for visas. Let them get some free fruits off China before they get annexed by China just like Tibet. We Indians should not treat everyone like our brother

  • We allowed Pak a separate country as they were dissatisfied. See now
  • We helped Bangladesh in its liberation. See now.
  • We gave utmost respect and opportunities to Nepal and its citizens. See their reaction towards India.
Learn to be arrogant.

https://www.quora.com/Whom-Nepali-support-more-Indian-or-Pakistan
 
Faje.
Never happened.
Indians have a problem with having only selective memories?
#GoHomeIndianMedia?? Remember that trend?
Also as a direct result the rescue workers were also asked to leave because of insensitiveness of the Indian media and rescue workers.
 
Sasti p rakhi ha OP na, I am all for India bashing etc but it's getting a little out of hand.
 
People who live in these small hermit kingdoms don't really like people from over crowded, poor, highly populated countries like Pakistan. These two kinds of people have totally opposite mentality. It's one of the reasons why Tibetans resisted Chinese rule even though it was a chance to become part of a big powerful country.
 
People who live in these small hermit kingdoms don't really like people from over crowded, poor, highly populated countries like Pakistan. These two kinds of people have totally opposite mentality. It's one of the reasons why Tibetans resisted Chinese rule even though it was a chance to become part of a big powerful country.

Never seen you post anything but negative things about pure land. Clearly you are not Pakistani so why this haramipan by using different flags?

@waz, @Horus, @WebMaster, time to permanently ban this false flagger.
 
Seriously brilliant idea. So when are you guys going to sleep so that you can dream about it.

There should be a limit for deluding yourself....
 
Time for an anti Indian, pakistan loving, china worshipping Nepali user on PDF. Admins take notice.

Pls make sure he doesnt go on anti shia and anti jew tirades like the Khalistani did.
 
Listening so a Pakistani claim Nepalese love them is hilarious , there are plenty of news videos of them bad mouthing Pakistan. Just last month Pakistani ceasefire violation killed 3 Nepali gurkha soliders.

I thought that point was clear when your isi spy disappeared in Nepal.both militaries have a codependency pact , from arms to troops to intel

stop waffling.....go to Nepal. I have ....many times
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom