What's new

PAF Today: Implications for India - Gp Capt B Menon

Re read what I said.
I am talking about Near Future, not present time. Currently PAF lags behind IAF by margins in both quantity and quality .:-)
Sir I Also Can just Request you to Research Bit About IAF Near Future and Inventory in 2020
Hypothetically Just Compare CAP Budget of two air force's And Operating Logistics

We Debate It in Separate thread If you want To Start It
 
.
Sir I Also Can just Request you to Research Bit About IAF Near Future and Inventory in 2020
I do have eye on IAF future plans too.
But issue is, all plans are ''lagging'' and likely to face further delays in coming half decade.
Like MMRCA deal, 126 to 80, then 80 to 36 and now it is in final stages.
Like LCA which is behind schadule and still no where to appear. LCA Mk2 after 2022, and Mk1A after 2018.
Like FGFA which depends on Su50, Su50 is facing technical glitches and delays while RAF have reduce the order to two squadrons only after 2020.
and AMCA, still to touch prototype stages exist in Blueprints only.

What else IAF plan is going smoothly? Addition of 16 Su30MKI per year? That's it? While Entire fleet of Mig27 and Mig21 is trembling on last feet. :coffee:
We Debate It in Separate thread If you want To Start It
Nope Thanks.
Hypothetically Just Compare CAP Budget of two air force's And Operating Logistics
Having bigger budget does not mean better air force. Corruption, failed projects, delays, lack of focus often cast more wastage of money ........... :smokin:
 
.
Sir you only have 18 airworthy jets against india that too is in the control of US

Mate again , the real word isn't bollywood, Pakistan F-16 A/B's have been upgraded to Block 40 level, back in 2010, Anatolian Eagle excercise Airforce Monthly July 2011 edition reported PAF F-16 A/B's ( not upgraded at the time) thrashed RAF Typhoons 3-3, I can post pic if you want. If PAF pilots can do that to NATO eurofighter typhoon pilots with non-upgraded F-16's, imagine what hell they can unleash on IAF with Block 52's or MLU upgraded F-16's, which has always lost much more aircraft to PAF in all previous conflicts, I don't want to debate, these things are available on Airforce Aces homepage, showing air to air kills since WW1 and have been discussed to death on this forum.

On the other hand large chunk of your airforce is Mig 21's (nicknamed flying coffins by your own pilots) and Mig29's/Jaguars/mirage 2000's...all can be countered by any aircraft in PAF inventory, be it the J-F 17 Thunder, F-7, F-16 or Mirage with ROSE upgrade etc. The only worthy aircraft you have is SU-30 MKI, that too looses its advantage in BVR combat, as Pakistan's F-16's and J-F 17's are BVR capable and SU-30 has a huge RCS , moreover F-16's are combat proven, and PAF holds the title to be the second country to shoot down hostile aircraft after Israel using F-16's, when PAF chopped off Soviet fighters trying to come from Afghanistan, while SU-30's (though good on paper) have never ever experienced any real combat nor ever shot down any aircraft in any conflict. @Windjammer
 
.
@Manticore

There is a term called Big Lie

A big lie (German: große Lüge) is a propaganda technique.

The expression was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, about the use of a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie
 
.
These both countries are miles away from you, and trust me no one them will come to your aid. Indians Will fight this war ( if theres any) on their own
Yes Miles Away From India But Not From Its Strategic Threat China Its All what India Wants

Why the ‘New’ US Trilateral Dialogue With Japan and India Matters

http://thediplomat.com/2015/10/why-the-new-us-trilateral-dialogue-with-japan-and-india-matters/


China has warned India and Japan against "provoking confrontation" and "creating tension" in the region, reacting to the decision to include Japan in the annual India-United States Malabar naval exercises on a regular basis.


http://indianexpress.com/article/in...d-naval-exercises-china-daily-cautions-india/

US_Encirclement_Of_China2.png




South-China-Sea.jpg

20130701_C130J-30.jpg



PS: As For Pointing out "Indians Will fight this war" ( if theres any) on their own.Let Me tell you Who Is the Perfect Example Country is Pakistan who Has Past Lesson & Experience in this Regard
 
. .
Yes Miles Away From India But Not From Its Strategic Threat China Its All what India Wants

Why the ‘New’ US Trilateral Dialogue With Japan and India Matters


http://thediplomat.com/2015/10/why-the-new-us-trilateral-dialogue-with-japan-and-india-matters/


China has warned India and Japan against "provoking confrontation" and "creating tension" in the region, reacting to the decision to include Japan in the annual India-United States Malabar naval exercises on a regular basis.



http://indianexpress.com/article/in...d-naval-exercises-china-daily-cautions-india/

US_Encirclement_Of_China2.png




South-China-Sea.jpg

20130701_C130J-30.jpg



PS: As For Pointing out "Indians Will fight this war" ( if theres any) on their own.Let Me tell you Who Is the Perfect Example Country is Pakistan who Has Past Lesson & Experience in this Regard
Hi,
Quoting biased source doesnt really add any valuable insight to the matter.

PS: Grow up and stop using bold and stop using underlines !!!!
 
.
Pakistani Government knows India's TRUE and Real capabilities

http://www.dawn.com/news/1239466

"Their army and arsenal stock is much larger and they are the largest importer of defence equipment," Foreign Office Spokesman Nafees Zakaria said in a statement.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-india-pakistan-idUSKCN0IA16X20141021

"Our conventional strength is far more than theirs. So if they persist with this, they'll feel the
pain of this adventurism," Indian Defense Minister Arun Jaitley told NDTV in an interview.
 
.
People should read the DATE of the Article when it was First written

http://www.indiandefencereview.com/news/pakistan-air-force-today-implications-for-india/

Then see the Writer's name

He is EX- IAF

IAF has been beating this Drum of diminishing capabilities for a very long time
in order to get the Rafale deal cleared
I have given the link and after the end of the article ive said that its a ploy to get rafales -- dont understand why members are portraying it as a paf fanboy article
 
.
"This article indirectly stresses for the need of rafale so pakistanis should not start thumping chests. IAF is modernizing with heavy weight multirole fighters even though they are not a 1;1 replacement, its a massive enhancement of capability a fact carefully cloaked in the conclusion"

Did you all bother reading the whole article and the reference link given there in?
OP has clearly written the above para at the end from his own side. The article is written in an indian website by an indian and is nothing more than an attempt to lobbying for more planes.
you are correct
 
.
I have given the link and after the end of the article ive said that its a ploy to get rafales -- dont understand why members are portraying it as a paf fanboy article

Ban those Rascals :yahoo: for Two days

They should be read a post carefully before making allegations
 
.
Hi,
Kid spend at least week, get used to of the forum and then come and talk!

Do you even know the topic at hand we are discussing, this is not some tu tu mai mai mohalla type debate.

Deny it or not, IAF will always keep China factor in its modernization pace, hence that is why it was included


These both countries are miles away from you, and trust me no one them will come to your aid. Indians Will fight this war ( if theres any) on their own
Afghan air force might support them.
Pakistanis r wetting their pants , they want to hide this, i except lot of false bravado article from ispr propaganda machine
The one wetting the pants called the ambassador to the defence office on just an acquisition of 8 aircraft.Judging by the way you type you are under 10.
USAF+IAF+JASDF=PAF+PLAAF There you have Actual Geopolitical Equation
Why the big font?Anyways what makes you think japan will come to your assist?JASDF stands for Japan air SELF DEFENCE force,they don't want another hiroshima/nagaski leading type adventures so that is WHY IT IS CALLED SELF DEFENCE they are not an offensive force.
The two air forces that might come to your "sudden "assist will be either be Bangladesh or Afghan air force.Which you know are not much to worry.In case of any war with India china and Pakistan IAF will be on its own.
IF USAF comes to your assist you will lose the support of Russian Air force :P
 
.
Hi,
Quoting biased source doesnt really add any valuable insight to the matter.

PS: Grow up and stop using bold and stop using underlines !!!!

Its Obvious when the Person Like you With Put With Hard Facts He goes Contrary Oppressive against it.That's your Case
you Need a "Shrink"

As the Fact About Growing Up Sir Mr Im Bureaucrat Appointed By Authorities on Place after Analyzing My Relevance And i Don't Need you Certificate

Rather Be More Technical and Subjective on Matter in Hand That Going Personal.If you have Contrary Point of View Feel Free to express.you Have No authority or Technical Facts to Subdue By Points

Why the big font?Anyways what makes you think japan will come to your assist?JASDF stands for Japan air SELF DEFENCE force,they don't want another hiroshima/nagaski leading type adventures so that is WHY IT IS CALLED SELF DEFENCE they are not an offensive force.
The two air forces that might come to your "sudden "assist will be either be Bangladesh or Afghan air force.Which you know are not much to worry.In case of any war with India china and Pakistan IAF will be on its own.
IF USAF comes to your assist you will lose the support of Russian Air force

I Have No Answer For Fan-boyish Fantasies Rather Read My post #42 to Get you Answers
 
Last edited:
. .
ts Obvious when the Person Like you With Put With Hard Facts He goes Contrary Oppressive against it.That's your Case
you Need a "Shrink"

As the Fact About Growing Up Sir Mr Im Bureaucrat Appointed By Authorities on Place after Analyzing My Relevance And i Don't Need you Certificate

Rather Be More Technical and Subjective on Matter in Hand That Going Personal.If you have Contrary Point of View Feel Free to express.you Have No authority or Technical Facts to Subdue By Points
Is that the reason why you had to resort to use bold letter and underline ones like a child !
It was you who went on emotional rant at the end of post not me

Afghan air force might support them
Please bemore subjective next time. Thanks
 
.
Back
Top Bottom