Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
there are many ways to confirm the kill, live cam easily catch the signature of a rival plane. plus enemy satellite do daily runway counts of the enemy base, plus watch every sortie very carefully on a daily basis.Alan Warnes ... one of the most reputed sources of info
on airforce & air warfare matters in the world
Lesson for all Pakistani. Guys always trust your official source. They are thorough professionals. They know what they are doing.
naaah, that sounds like language from marashtra area, probably a crash related to drdo's and hal's "superb" maintenance...I reckon this is more likely SU30 2nd pilot dropped on indian side, he is not abhinandan as the locals are speaking hindi language.
New Recruit
Maharashtra crash incident happened in june 2018. This video is uploaded on 7th march 2019. Make more sence of 7th feb skirmish.naaah, that sounds like language from marashtra area, probably a crash related to drdo's and hal's "superb" maintenance...
Well regardless of the time period the language isn't even remotely close to the one found spoken around the theater of operation.Maharashtra crash incident happened in june 2018. This video is uploaded on 7th march 2019. Make more sence of 7th feb skirmish.
No, that's incorrect. This pilot is apparently a Jaguar pilot. Crash took place on Jan 19, 2019.I reckon this is more likely SU30 2nd pilot dropped on indian side, he is not abhinandan as the locals are speaking hindi language.
The guidance for the H4 is optional not and a must. It is carried out if neededwould tell you you need 2 seats for guidance of Raptor 1 & 2.
This is where the IAF claim is interesting and agrees with the PAF. The downed aircraft is a 2 seater (Su30 in PAF's claim). You don't specifically claim downing of a 2 seater F-16 until you are pretty sure since most F-16s are single seaters. They wanted the aircraft to be a D model but were more than willing to settle for a B as evidenced by their post Foreign Policy article claims. And the pilot they claimed was 'lynched' was from 19 SQN which fly the B model. Indians themselves are not sure what to claimSO why F-16D or F-16B why PAF top fighte
They're clutching for straws. Deep down they're salty and burning with frustration to score one over so they resort to deceptive methods. It's pure frustration fed by hatred and jealousy.This is where the IAF claim is interesting and agrees with the PAF. The downed aircraft is a 2 seater (Su30 in PAF's claim). You don't specifically claim downing of a 2 seater F-16 until you are pretty sure since most F-16s are single seaters. They wanted the aircraft to be a D model but were more be more than willing to settle for a B as evidenced by their post Foreign Policy article claims. And the pilot they claimed was 'lynched' was from 19 SQN which fly the B model. Indians themselves are not sure what to claim
i agree with you.
And that’s not mean an F16 was shot down.
Currently we have more to lose if we reveal with proof that we shot down an MKI because that could stop our JF17 program. Chineses engine for JF17 is not yet ready to go in mass production according what I understood from my readings on this forum.
Adding to that, if F16 was really shotdown then, what stopped indians to come again after what we did on the 27th ? After all a Supa Powa should not be scared from a 7 times smaller country, isn’t it ?
And mostly when you saw the face of the indians drag queens showing the piece of AIM120 as a proof that F16 was used so according to their logic an F16 was shotdown ...cough cough
So continue to believe what you want but there is nothing actually which tend to confirm loss on our side.
Elaborate plz.
Elaborate plz.
What elaboration is needed? You claim victory whilst whining about the other side allegedly using a type of plane.Elaborate plz.