What's new

PAF Acquires PL15 Missile for JFT

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
And you know it is baseless because Xi Jin Ping told you personally?
No because it has no ramjet engine because it
Will take a lot of time and effort to integrate it in our systems if at all possible. And the geopolitics of current situation makes it very hard for China to rush in a new system.and so on sir
 
.
No because it has no ramjet engine because it
Will take a lot of time and effort to integrate it in our systems if at all possible. And the geopolitics of current situation makes it very hard for China to rush in a new system.and so on sir

How do you know it will take a lot of time and what geopolitics stops China from selling this missile to Pakistan?
 
.
The AESA radar of JF-17 has range of 190 KM so whats the point of getting 300 KM range :raise::raise:

Efficacy on maximum radar range and after lock on it can go beyond 100KM in chase mode and become sticker :azn: while the victim got frustrated trying evasive maneuvers but missile wont leave its a$$ :devil: until get shoved in its butts.
 
. .
How do you know it will take a lot of time and what geopolitics stops China from selling this missile to Pakistan?
If I was air chief of PAF I would not be worth my salt if I had not integrated PL15 with JF17 at least one year back.
As for radar range PL15 has its own AESA radar plus the 2 way data link and I think it has satellite guidance as well so I think it's ready to rock and roll
 
.
How do you know it will take a lot of time and what geopolitics stops China from selling this missile to Pakistan?

Our existing radars on JF-17 are not capable to fire PL-15. There was a reason SD-10 integration JF-17 took a long time. SD-10 A become ope rationalized in Block-2 when KLJ was upgraded to V-2. PL-15 is a long range missile. It needs integration and drop tests as well as a matching radar to utilize it's full potential. Hence the news is baseless. Most likely someone is trying to spread the rumors.

If I was air chief of PAF I would not be worth my salt if I had not integrated PL15 with JF17 at least one year back.
As for radar range PL15 has its own AESA radar plus the 2 way data link and I think it has satellite guidance as well so I think it's ready to rock and roll

ZDK-03 doesnot have the capability to guide Missile through it's radar continuously . Neither Erieye has that capability.
 
.
No because it has no ramjet engine because it
Will take a lot of time and effort to integrate it in our systems if at all possible. And the geopolitics of current situation makes it very hard for China to rush in a new system.and so on sir
Maybe PAF wants JF-17 Blk III to be the answer for India's Rafale.
 
. .
Is the current combat radar on board JF-17 capable to handle this long range missile?
 
. .
I think it has satellite guidance
I have a question about this part of your post. Whose satellite are we going to use and how many concurrent guidance for missile launches will that satellite be able to process at any given instance in time? If its not our satellite that we are going to use (quite likely case) then what will be the priority of guidance requests for our missile launches?
Thanks.
 
.
QdvCVlxh



Satellite images show madrasa buildings still standing at scene of Indian bombing

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ding-at-scene-of-indian-bombing-idUSKCN1QN00V
 
.
Our existing radars on JF-17 are not capable to fire PL-15. There was a reason SD-10 integration JF-17 took a long time. SD-10 A become ope rationalized in Block-2 when KLJ was upgraded to V-2. PL-15 is a long range missile. It needs integration and drop tests as well as a matching radar to utilize it's full potential. Hence the news is baseless. Most likely someone is trying to spread the rumors.



ZDK-03 doesnot have the capability to guide Missile through it's radar continuously . Neither Erieye has that capability.
What about it's own integral AESA ?
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom