The leader was a paedophile so are his followers ..786If the Bit$$$$ Wants to get Fcuked why you are blaming me you must be doing the same sh$$ other wise she will replace us with sex toys and Dog.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The leader was a paedophile so are his followers ..786If the Bit$$$$ Wants to get Fcuked why you are blaming me you must be doing the same sh$$ other wise she will replace us with sex toys and Dog.
Crime statistics in case of minorities suffer from "statistical bias". Smaller samples means anything beyond some limited numbers starts looking like HUGE.
Please avoid spreading such biased numbers.
While you have every right to focus on the awful crime being discussed in this thread, why on earth you will simply ignore the almost 75% of the crime.
Why can't you just say that white majority is committing majority of molestation and sexual exploitation?
Why are you purposefully ignoring 75 out of 100 exploited women, in your noble quest to save just 25 or 26?
But you won't
Because you have a point to prove that Muslims are low life chimps, their mullahs are pigs (and in some cases that is true), and thus the whole Muslim group in UK, or even EU is all f'd up b@stardized collection of homosapians.
Say it brother.
Say it?
It may help you deal with your chronicically constipated conspiratorial mind. Say it!
In this way you can also tell your wife, your mother, and your sister and your daughter to avoid touching a Muslim not even with a 10 feet pole, because they are all dirty, lowlife scums.
This perhaps is the real reason of why so many Hindus just jumped on this thread with their dhoties fluttering high behind them.
Perhaps this is the real reason.
Oh Common!
What the f this statement for?
FYI.
I'll be the first one to say that such Mullahs are losers and Talib-b@stards.
but you are committing huge intellectually dishonest leap into the gutter, by linking what these turd Mullahs say to the awful sexual crimes of the few men involved.
No one can ever support such Mullahs.
But you my dear PhD degree holder, ever tried to figure out why these Mullahs are saying such awful stuff?
Do you?
Did you ever go and interview a single Mullah and ask him, hey dude? Why the f^ck you are making this type of statements.
FYI. I have asked this. I have pleaded face to face these village idiots to not say things such as these.
They say, we DO NOT want our young men to get involved with white trash (You think a Muslim invented the term white trash, do you?).
That's all.
These village idiot Mullahs do not know how to emphasize chaste behavior to the young boys in their community, so they use politically incorrect statements about white trash.
Obviously their message never got through to these guys and they did end up f^cking white trash and then getting caught up in the sex scandal.
But you will never try to understand why the f ing Mullah said and what these criminals ended up doing, and if an honest intellectual should ever link the two?
No Siree. you all are committing mental masturbation by imagining X-rated movie showing a lowlife scum-bag Asian having intercourse with white trash. Yes. Admit it you all net-warriors because most of you are not getting any. And this type of posting are the only way for you all to have "fun" and the expense of scum-bags and exploited white women. This is the only way.
And to get this mental masturbation you are more than willing to commit nth degree of intellectual dishonesty.
But may be you even do not know that you are committing intellectual dishonesty. Because some small brain is having too much "fun".
Perhaps you are just a fine and gentle young man.
Who knows.
in this day of anonymous web postings. who knows.
peace
The victims range from white girls from did functional families to Hindu and Sikh girls from conservative families. But never Muslim girls. Is it just a coincidence ?
You are conflating two different issues here. That figure was produced by a charity, is highly speculative in nature and is not based on actual prosecutions. It tries to put a cumulative figure on different forms of child exploitation including trafficking and private fostering. Nowhere does the report state that 5000 children are working the streets as prostitutes and the government has since acted to clamp down on legal loopholes that may have allowed children to be exposed to such abuse.
Whilst I am not denying that children continue to be sexually exploited in the UK by individuals other than Muslims but its the scale, shared modus operandi, the apparent racial motivation and the over representation of a certain ethnic group among the offenders that distinguishes this particular pattern of child abuse from the rest.
Also note that the victim figure of 100 is for just one case in Telford that went to court last month. The total number of children abused across the UK by similar groups is likely to run into many hundreds..
More reading comprehension problems for you.
That 28% includes unknown Asian which are the lion's share of the Asian category. I gave the breakdown of the figures above in Table 4, page 41.
Data currently suggests that a disproportionate number of offenders are British Asian, particularly British Pakistani, males. However, more work needs to be done with a broader set of data to better understand whether any correlation exists.
http://www.ceop.police.uk/Documents/ceopdocs/CEOPThreatA_2012_190612_web.pdf
People without an agenda, who can read actual numbers, are welcome to look at the actual data instead of your disingenuous claims. London police will tell you that Asian gangs include Tamil Hindu, Bangladeshi and Pakistani gangs..
Another justification of the crime. Not once did you see the problem with the muslim community. Muslims are over represented in these crime why?
People are asking these questions.
No one would be convinced that islam is not tied to this.
People are now blaming islam as the root of the problem. Why? What has the muslim community done about that?
Case after case, Pakistani muslims are caught in these acts? Why?
Absolute horrendous treatment was meted out to these girls as young as 13.
The problem is staring you in the face and you turn your back towards it.
And someone lacks basic cognitive skills.
Another justification of the crime. Not once did you see the problem with the muslim community. Muslims are over represented in these crime why?
People are asking these questions.
No one would be convinced that islam is not tied to this.
People are now blaming islam as the root of the problem. Why? What has the muslim community done about that?
Case after case, Pakistani muslims are caught in these acts? Why?
Absolute horrendous treatment was meted out to these girls as young as 13.
The problem is staring you in the face and you turn your back towards it.
Islam doesn't condone such idiotic sentiments. However, history does suggest that Muslim men do use religion to exploit women.
That is how they used to do it British-era Bengal (my part), and women's rights have come a long way. It was a hard road to the achievement today. And there's still a lot of work to be done.
Even today in countries like Egypt and Afghanistan, women's rights to self-respect and achievement are an issue. And overcoming those barriers put by a bunch of misogynists is a long and hard path (sad but true).
This is a similar tactic those idiots are trying to use in the Western world.
More reading comprehension problems for you.
That 28% includes unknown Asian which are the lion's share of the Asian category. I gave the breakdown of the figures above in Table 4, page 41.
I suggest you read the actual report instead of making things up.
The discussion is about sexual exploitation of minors and the Home Office estimates 5000.
Lots of things are 'likely to be' in people's minds. I prefer to deal with reality rather than people's projections out of thin air.
the CEOP report
it would be foolish to conclude on that basis that there were no individuals of Pakistani origin in the 'unknown Asian' group, which appears to be whole premise of your argument.
In fact there is much anecdotal evidence to the contrary coming from members of the Muslim community itself, as cited in the OP.
If on the other hand you insist on living in denial and since the burden of proof is on you to establish that the 'Asian other' group includes no individuals of Pakistani origin,
organised grooming of Sikh and Hindu girls by Muslim men has been a long standing concern of both communities in the UK and in fact, 'Shere e Punjab' was formed in the 80s to specifically counter this threat.
I repeat, those figures are not based on actual convictions and were produced by a charity which may have a vested interest in inflating numbers.
in my opinion [...] thought to be
WHY OH WHY do you insist on exposing your ignorance of statistics and basic English?
s. Data currently suggests that a disproportionate number of offenders are British Asian, particularly British Pakistani, males. However, more work needs to be done with a broader set of data to better understand whether any correlation exists.
The 28% includes ALL ASIANS -- including Unknowns --.
The only definitive number for Pakistanis is 45 = 3.5%
The number of Unknown Asians is 290.
No amount of twisting numbers will substantiate your bogus insinuation that these 290 'Unknowns' were all Pakistani.
The London Police also had a special task force dedicated to tackle Tamil Hindu gangs. Should we conclude that they pose the main threat to security in London?
its not all muslims, there are no arabs and no iranians as well, nor bangladeshi... its specific cultural issue mostly pakistani (and applies to north India as well)
The report itself contains the disclosure up front that the data is meager and is weighted. This lessens the credibility of any conclusions based on the report's data.