Osama Bin Laden 'SHAHEED'? PM Imran Khan Speech in National Assembly

[Gentelman]

Smart slip of tongue...
Smarter would have been to use english word at that place 'killed'....

 

[Yaseen1]

Pakistan had no threat from Osama Bin Ladin,our main enemy is india so it not matters much for us whether he is regarded as hero or terrorist,real terrorism in Pakistan is due to india and cia

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Lol

Having a hard day?

No. Why?

Can i take that moral Moses's staff and subject all PTI and Imran Khan fans as potential extremists and fanatics?

IK's views on Pakistan joining the US War on Terror have always been controversial. Go back and read my posts on his views before he became Prime Minister and you'll find that I was a strong critic of his positions on that.

Remember that he was nicknamed 'Taliban Khan' a long time ago.

 

[Dil_Pakistan]

sala marway ga humary AH1Z or C130J

Don't worry, Trump himself is a fan of king Jon Un and Putin.. I think it was just covering all bases to be honest. He initially said killed but added shaheed later, as in a certain section who knows OBL as martyr..it's like if he had said killed, a certain section would have called him anti-islam, jew agent etc..now he added shaheed to placate others so the so called liberal brigade will be out for blood..
It was a good speech though overall from the reviews i read. Now our own inhouse Billo has just said "PM diljaspi nahin leti"..now no one will make a fuss on that lol..

 

[Gentelman]

extra judicial killing hahahaha

inteqam Sakht lega IK Osama ka

Hari Om

Hari Om

Its not about revenge but a head of state's speech should be away from controversies...
They should balance things out for each and everyone.

 

[El Sidd]

IK's views on Pakistan joining the US War on Terror have always been controversial. Go back and read my posts on his views before he became Prime Minister and you'll find that I was a strong critic of his positions on that.

Remember that he was nicknamed 'Taliban Khan' a long time ago.

Ertugul Khan is the new name. Talibans do not want anything to do with this munafiq

Its not about revenge but a head of state's speech should be away from controversies...
They should balance things out for each and everyone.

He is not Head of State.

He is head of government. A toothless government which can crumble any time 4 or 5 drunkard central Punjab politicians get a phone call from UMPIRE haha

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Ertugul Khan is the new name. Talibans do not want anything to do with this munafiq

Either way, his views on Pakistan joining the WoT are not new - he's been consistent about them (dialog instead of military force) and attracted a lot of criticism.

PTI supporters voted for him knowing those views. It helped of course that FATA & Swat had already been largely stabilized by the time the 2018 elections came around so those views weren't really an issue that voters had to consider.

 

[El Sidd]

Either way, his views on Pakistan joining the WoT are not new - he's been consistent about them (dialog instead of military force) and attracted a lot of criticism.

PTI supporters voted for him knowing those views. It helped of course that FATA & Swat had already been largely stabilized by the time the 2018 elections came around so those views weren't really an issue that voters had to consider.

His views aren't really an issue for anyone. He is just a face

 

[Village life]

What ever good he will try to do or speak will be turned into bad and against him , Inshallah ,
عمران خان سیدھا کام بھی کرے گا تو وہ الٹا ہو گا انشاء اللہ ،

 

[Raj-Hindustani]

Pakistan had no threat from Osama Bin Ladin,our main enemy is india so it not matters much for us whether he is regarded as hero or terrorist,real terrorism in Pakistan is due to india and cia

Young generation actually don't know the actual story... Pak media blames to India and then, Pakistani blames to India.

If I will go thru the history from 1979 to gen mushh u-turn in 2001, then all Pakistani politicians and pak army people will be blamed for their blunders and caused terrorism in Pakistan.

But India is a easy target.... So go on.. Thanks

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

His views aren't really an issue for anyone. He is just a face

Look, if you're going to start trolling again, then there is no point in engaging.

You made a comment about his views on Pakistan joining the WoT, and, as is usual, when you can't respond rationally, you start dancing and jumping around.

Young generation actually don't know the actual story... Pak media blames to India and then, Pakistani blames to India.

If I will go thru the history from 1979 to gen mushh u-turn then all Pakistani politicians and army will be blamed for their blunders and caused terrorism in Pakistan.

But India is a easy target.... So go on.. Thanks

Has Indian stopped its State terrorism in J&K and decided to abide by her commitment to the UNSC Resolutions to hold a plebiscite in J&K?

No?

Then India is still the problem, as it was when it supported terrorism in East Pakistan, Balochistan and the TTP.

 

[El Sidd]

Look, if you're going to start trolling again, then there is no point in engaging.

You made a comment about his views on Pakistan joining the WoT, and, as is usual, when you can't respond rationally, you start dancing and jumping around.

You should simply do some data mining on PTI fan and vote base before throwing words like jumping and dancing.

I don't need to go into details how controversial views of a PM can get political leverage legally despite heroic efforts of propagandist down the food chain.

 

[Armchair]

The US was asked for evidence to prove that Ossama was responsible - but they refused to show their evidence, claiming its classified. But it seems Muslims today are ashamed of themselves and don't even need evidence to blame their own and have them executed without charge.

 

[IMARV]

For those who don't want to go through the whole speech and don't understand Urdu, here's a rough translation (from 44 minutes on):

"The amount of humiliation Pakistan has had to endure by becoming a partner of the US in the US war on terror is unprecedented. It didn't matter what Pakistan did, we were blamed and humiliated for US failures in Afghanistan.

There are two events that were shameful for Pakistan, that we are ashamed of. The first is that the US came into Pakistan and killed Osama Bin Laden in Abottabad ... martyred him. What happened after that? The entire world abused us .. called us evil. Our own ally intruded into Pakistan and killed someone and didn't inform us despite the fact that we have lost 70,000 Pakistanis in their war on terror.

The second thing to be ashamed of, the drone attacks in Pakistan ..."

For those trying to understand Imran Khan on this, keep in mind his consistent and vociferous opposition to Pakistan becoming part of the US WoT, deploying Pakistani forces in FATA and the drone attacks, since the US invasion of Afghanistan.

IK has always spoken in favor of dialog and negotiations, even in FATA, to address the issues there. In his view, FATA and Swat would not have become the hotbeds of terrorism that they did had it not been for Pakistan joining the US War on Terror. Whether you agree or disagree with that position, it is one that he strongly believes in.

IK isn't in support of terrorism, he just has a different point of view on how things should have been handled in Pakistan and Afghanistan post 9/11 attacks.

Are you trying to say if someone do not deal with a terrorist the way you want, the killing of terrorist will become martyrdom?

 

[Jungibaaz]

I know it may sound like he’s criticising the PPP when he’s talking about WoT, but he’s really criticising both the government and especially army during that PPP tenure and Musharraf too.

As for OBL, the truth can’t stay buried forever. The US at a later date if not us, will eventually confirm that our intel services had OBL in their custody. And when the Americans came, it was a deal they made with the army leadership. To say that we didn’t know about their ‘raid’ is wrong, maybe some civilians mightn’t have known but those who were holding Bin Laden knew. In fact, they may well have accompanied US personnel into the compound in Abbottabad.