Operation Asifa: 45 Indian soldiers killed by Kashmiri resistance in Pulwama.

[Jackdaws]

Kashmir remains on the agenda of UNSC as an unresolved international dispute and the UN refuses to accept the Indian position and terminate UNMOGIP.

The 'legal' procedure will be:

Pakistan, India and the Kashmiris reach an agreement on the settlement of the Kashmir dispute, then they go back to the UN Security Council to get another resolution to endorse that procedure.

Until then, Kashmir will remain a disputed territory under International Law.

Are you saying the UNMOGIP has a mandate beyond the LoC?

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

Looks like a false flag ops by India to discredit Pak. Iranian attack was the first one...

Timing and intended outcome say it all....

Anyway outsiders are not that fools to isolate Pak and not to get fruits of their investments there!!! If it wins Modi an election, go for it....

 

[Tom M]

how ? you know both countries is armed to the teeth, and any full scale war will escalate to the level of MAD .

Why do people expect a reply for some proxy attack in a conventional way as in 2008 ??? As said every time, every response will be in kind I guess. Sadly, nothing happens without any reason inside Pakistan as well.

Looks like a false flag ops by India to discredit Pak. Iranian attack was the first one...

Timing and intended outcome say it all....

Just like Turkey kills her own forces just to blame it on PKK and indirectly on U.S.A, huh ??

 

[M. Sarmad]

Are you saying the UNMOGIP has a mandate beyond the LoC?

The UN has a mandate beyond the LoC.

Even if Pakistan and India are (somehow) able to resolve the Kashmir Dispute bilaterally, they will have to go to the UNSC for "endorsement".

 

[Ghareeb_Da_Baal]

A year from now the Uri 2 will be released. We just saw the script today.

part 2 is gonna be called Uri Baba

 

[Trango Towers]

Why do people expect a reply for some proxy attack in a conventional way as in 2008 ??? As said every time, every response will be in kind I guess. Sadly, nothing happens without any reason inside Pakistan as well.



Just like Turkey kills her own forces just to blame it on PKK and indirectly on U.S.A, huh ??

Tom you celebrate when vermin indian forces kill kids in kashmir. Now the oppressed are celebrating. Enjoy the fruits of your labour. IEDs have entered your arena. NATO lost dues to tyese bad babies in afghanistan

 

[PaklovesTurkiye]

war is very pragmatic.

Yes, it is...Hope you join in

1st button got pressed.

 

[Sam.]

Blood is owed and it shall we reap.

@Nilgiri @Vibrio @padamchen @Joe Shearer

 

[Chhatrapati]

#Terrorism-has-no-religion at least the terrorists do.

 

[padamchen]

Blood is owed and it shall we reap.

@Nilgiri @Vibrio @padamchen @Joe Shearer

Do you see a link with the attack in Iran?

Cheers, Doc

 

[Tom M]

Tom you celebrate when vermin indian forces kill kids in kashmir. Now the oppressed are celebrating. Enjoy the fruits of your labour. IEDs have entered your arena. NATO lost dues to tyese bad babies in afghanistan

Well there is a big, big difference. NATO are alieans to the regions, with their home bases miles apart. But it is our turf, just see how it is crushed. Did IED's which entered your arena decades back force Pakistan army to loose your WOT?? If not it is the same here, rather lot more easy if GOI plan to use brute force like Zarb-e-azb etc.

 

[Max]

#Terrorism-has-no-religion at least the terrorists do.

pagan terrorists killed 100K Kashmiris, injured lacs for asking the rights they were promised in UN and still trying to act as victim. Victims are Kashmiri not Gangadeshi occupiers.

 

[Tom M]

The UN has a mandate beyond the LoC.

Even if Pakistan and India are (somehow) able to resolve the Kashmir Dispute bilaterally, they will have to go to the UNSC for "endorsement".

Not exactly. UN is just another global forum. And none of the members need a UN endorsement to enter any bilateral agreement.

If any such agreement ever happen between our nations (highly unlikely) the UN resolutions etc. Will by default become irrlavent and get removed in due time.

 

[M. Sarmad]

Not exactly. UN is just another global forum. And none of the members need a UN endorsement to enter any bilateral agreement.

If any such agreement ever happen between our nations (highly unlikely) the UN resolutions etc. Will by default become irrlavent and get removed in due time.

The UN is not just another global forum.

And no, you are wrong. The UN Resolutions cannot become irrelevant and invalid with the passage of time as they are not timebound.

UN endorsement and a fresh UNSC resolution will be needed to terminate UNMOGIP and remove Kashmir from the agenda of UNSC (as an unresolved international dispute) even if Pakistan and India reached an agreement (outside the UN).

 

[Tom M]

The UN is not just another global forum.

And no, you are wrong. The UN Resolutions cannot become irrelevant and invalid with the passage of time as they are not timebound.

UN endorsement and a fresh UNSC resolution will be needed to terminate UNMOGIP and remove Kashmir from the agenda of UNSC (as an unresolved international dispute) even if Pakistan and India reached an agreement (outside the UN).

How hard Pakistan may try. UN and UNSC is irrelevant as far as Kashmir dispute is concerned. The reason why all UN members, the P5 including your all weather friend China only request and never demand us to resolve any issues through bilateral talks.

So yes all these resolutions or the UNMOGIP will always be there in paper with not much teeth or powers. LOL