Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay, now some serious questions!
*Bullet Proof Ballistic Helmet = 12,000/- taka
Ok.
*Hand to Hand communicator set = 45,000/- taka
What is that communicator? Doesn't seem to be sat phone, then walkie-talkie? That costly?
*Night Vision Devise, NVG(II) = 180,000/- taka
Ok.
*Global Positioning System or GPS(ডান হাতে মিনি স্ক্রিন মনিটর) = 168,000/- taka
168,000/- taka!!! Nowadays even a 3000 taka phone flaunts GPS! Okay, army's GPS is super-advanced, but 168,000/- taka??
*Kevler Bullet Proof vest = 188,000/- taka
Ok.
*New BD-08 Mark II assault rifle = 32,000/- taka
My god! The cheapest thing so far, and its the most important thing in any war!
Btw, how come the assault rifle is so cheap? 32,000/- Bangladeshi taka is like USD 411......!!!
*4x optical ACOG sight = 40,000/- taka
Damn! Sight is costlier than the gun!!
*Eye Protective Gear = 6,000/- taka
Ok.
*Side Weapon = 25,000/- taka.
Cheap, very cheap!
So, 700000 taka Gadget for one soldier.
Out of 700,000/- taka gear, only 65,000/- taka is for the guns!!
There is no comparison. Indian trained Rawami dalals will sabotage any war effort. So obviously Myanmar will win.
Locally produced ULARV 1 Scout vehicles of Myanmar Army. More than 200 ULARV 1 are in service.
what is the Myanmar official defence budget, and what is its real budget? what percentage of the GDP is spent on defence?
ေကာင္းေလစြ........by Enigma code..Adding some specification of this..
Type -Amoured Scout Car
Weapon - twin 30mm RCWS ( Locally built with the help of SGs)
Capability - 2 crews + 4
Bro..ခန ေစာင့္ျကည့္ျကမလား.. ခုဟာက ကြ်န္ေတာ္တို့ ဘက္က ပို့စ္ေတြ မ်ားေနပီ.. သူတို့ဟာေတြ တင္ပါေစ.. ပီးမွ ဝိုင္းဖဲ့ျကတာေပါ့.. အင္ဒီရမ္း ေတြလဲ ေရာက္လာပီဆိုေတာ့... @dragunov87
Nothing special.. Mate.. Just 2.4B $...
$2.4bn on defence from a GDP of $60bn, thats 4%. From what has been writen, Myanmar spends more on defence then health and education combined? Is that sustainable in the long run?
Bangladesh only spends roughly 1.2% of its GDP on defence or around the $2bn mark, but most of that goes on salaries and other remunerations for officers, relatively little is spent on equipment (the gov is trying to keep the generals happy so they dont overthrough them).
myanmar has done really well on just a $2.4bn budget, they either spent very little on salaries and other remunarations or the budget has been under reported. Either way i like the way your armed forces have developed the local defence industries.
Okay, now some serious questions!
*Bullet Proof Ballistic Helmet = 12,000/- taka
Ok.
*Hand to Hand communicator set = 45,000/- taka
What is that communicator? Doesn't seem to be sat phone, then walkie-talkie? That costly?
*Night Vision Devise, NVG(II) = 180,000/- taka
Ok.
*Global Positioning System or GPS(ডান হাতে মিনি স্ক্রিন মনিটর) = 168,000/- taka
168,000/- taka!!! Nowadays even a 3000 taka phone flaunts GPS! Okay, army's GPS is super-advanced, but 168,000/- taka??
*Kevler Bullet Proof vest = 188,000/- taka
Ok.
*New BD-08 Mark II assault rifle = 32,000/- taka
My god! The cheapest thing so far, and its the most important thing in any war!
Btw, how come the assault rifle is so cheap? 32,000/- Bangladeshi taka is like USD 411......!!!
*4x optical ACOG sight = 40,000/- taka
Damn! Sight is costlier than the gun!!
*Eye Protective Gear = 6,000/- taka
Ok.
*Side Weapon = 25,000/- taka.
Cheap, very cheap!
So, 700000 taka Gadget for one soldier.
Out of 700,000/- taka gear, only 65,000/- taka is for the guns!!
That's how the soldiers are today. Firearm are secondary concern over survivability and having cutting edge equipment. I mean if a fully decked Bangladeshi battalion goes up against an Indian battalion armed with only their rifle and the clothes on their back. I don't need to tell you whose going to win?
That's how the soldiers are today. Firearm are secondary concern over survivability and having cutting edge equipment. I mean if a fully decked Bangladeshi battalion goes up against an Indian battalion armed with only their rifle and the clothes on their back. I don't need to tell you whose going to win?
You missed the point, some of the equipment are surprisingly costly, while some are amazingly cheap.
I think he just want to point out some are so expansive than he think while some so cheaper than he do.. In weaponry the better , the more expansive .. The best gadget without reliable weapons like a defender with no attack while the best weapons without any gadgets is like an vulnerable attacker.. So it need to be balance.. Just my thought..