What's new

Open Discussion : Bangladesh And Myanmar Armed Force

I like the self reliance policy of Myanmar Defence Industries... DI of MM provides all basic needs for the soldiers.. from Kevlar helmet through bulletproof vest and small arms to boots....
 
. .
.
well currrently i am feeling sleepy, i will start tomorrow ok ? :D

:D ok..

our STF crews.. still need some weapon upgrading.. in this year.. they will get MA1MK3 Bull-pup..
1937498_636965266422907_382265738881797833_n.jpg
 
. .
I like the self reliance policy of Myanmar Defence Industries... DI of MM provides all basic needs for the soldiers.. from Kevlar helmet through bulletproof vest and small arms to boots....

Self reliance may help, but having better "toys" will be the defining factor. Even if Myanmar is "self reliant" are the weapons they produce are up to date with STANAG requirement?
 
Last edited:
.
Start to issue from 2015 to the whole army...

Locally designed and produced by MM army.. Digital camouflage for armed force..
View attachment 183614

MA-1 MK 3 Bull-pup AR
View attachment 183615
Beasting and Feasting baby, look at this cheese, we are now copy worthy!!!!!! lol


View attachment 183643
this will give you more closer look
If indeed like you said Bangledesh is thinking full on arming these men with those, I would recommend against it, don't make the Philippine's mistake of upgrading single soldier's equipment instead of the bigger picture.

America at one point had terrible equipment, but paid the big price for the big ticket items, fighters, guns, tanks, DDGs, and such, similarly, you can find Chinese troops far less equipped than filipino dudes in arms, but our guns, missiles, tanks, bombers, and more will knock people out before it even gets to that stage.

Think about it, a couple billion dollars worth and China isn't doing it, we spent 39 billion on procurement last year 2013, yet almost none went into that.


That's how the soldiers are today. Firearm are secondary concern over survivability and having cutting edge equipment. I mean if a fully decked Bangladeshi battalion goes up against an Indian battalion armed with only their rifle and the clothes on their back. I don't need to tell you whose going to win?

India is, single soldier going one on one is over, it's system vs system, you need every piece of equipment from every sector to function effectively. Soldier's equipment is mostly the least effective of the bunch actually.
 
.
Volga M2 long range SAM of Myanmar Army. Myanmar Army is operating 48 Volga M2 long range SAM systems.



10425024_760897147299591_3144735723390810883_n.jpg


SATCOM

10155144_728743130514993_7096520923315791713_n.jpg

10378070_728736117182361_3473524071562944211_n.jpg


BE Units

10377088_728735523849087_8096523432670799153_n.jpg

10154974_728735700515736_8506623802733208586_n.jpg

1501708_728735930515713_6174807285980535025_n.jpg


Locally designed 14.5 mm CIWS gatling gun.

1609694_632214896834484_968431156_n.jpg


NORA B 52 155 mm of Myanmar Army in action

10171730_645197215536252_5367032187333014000_n.jpg
 
. .
Beasting and Feasting baby, look at this cheese, we are now copy worthy!!!!!! lol



If indeed like you said Bangledesh is thinking full on arming these men with those, I would recommend against it, don't make the Philippine's mistake of upgrading single soldier's equipment instead of the bigger picture.

America at one point had terrible equipment, but paid the big price for the big ticket items, fighters, guns, tanks, DDGs, and such, similarly, you can find Chinese troops far less equipped than filipino dudes in arms, but our guns, missiles, tanks, bombers, and more will knock people out before it even gets to that stage.

Think about it, a couple billion dollars worth and China isn't doing it, we spent 39 billion on procurement last year 2013, yet almost none went into that.




India is, single soldier going one on one is over, it's system vs system, you need every piece of equipment from every sector to function effectively. Soldier's equipment is mostly the least effective of the bunch actually.

Exactly..!! what i want to say.. bro.. :D
BD should fill up its lacking AD system instead of investing billion dollar just in equipments of army..

BTW, bro.., do u feel familiar when u see MA1 MK3..? yeah., that's cousin of China QBZ 97.. :D
 
Last edited:
. . .
.
Linky:
Standardization Agreement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For example:
STANAG 4569
There's 5 level of protection with 5 being the best.

For EXAMPLE the ANOA APC is a level 3:

PB100021.JPG

Level 3
Kinetic Energy
7.62 x 51 AP (WC core) at 30 meters with 930 m/s

Grenade and Mine Blast Threat
8 kg (explosive mass) Blast AT Mine:
3a – Mine Explosion pressure activated under any wheel or track location.
3b – Mine Explosion under center.

So how do u think this MM made 4x4 APC MAV-4 resistance level..?

index.jpg
 
.
So how do u think this MM made 4x4 APC MAV-4 resistance level..?

View attachment 184167

Gauging non-NATO country weapons are a bit tricky cause they don't really adhere to NATO standard, but if I give it a score it will be around 1 or 2 probably (cause you don't really give me anything to work with here). I will give you another example:

This is prob the equivalent of MAV-4 in here.
0031tbx6.jpg

P2 Commando: P2 KOMANDO - INDONESIAN MILITARY VEHICLES


Shooting tests at the back door
Fired a Russian AK-47, a Chinese Type 56 (AK clone) and an M16 from 75 and 50 metres. No real harm, but it seems like the cover of the firing port was ripped off by the bullets.
0019h0hh.jpg
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom