rockstar08
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 11,096
- Reaction score
- -16
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is indeed something very precious for Muslims
Two things are proven here by this discovery
1. that text in Quran is indeed not altered
2. the age of Islam
I wonder where they stole it from and declared it theirs? Wonder if the city stolen from is documented ....
I wonder where they stole it from and declared it theirs? Wonder if the city stolen from is documented ....
So how does sheep skin with Arabic written on it fit in chocolates?Sorry i think i missed posting some parts.
The news says
The manuscript is part of the Mingana Collection of more than 3,000 Middle Eastern documents gathered in the 1920s by Alphonse Mingana, a Chaldean priest born near Mosul in modern-day Iraq.
He was sponsored to take collecting trips to the Middle East by Edward Cadbury, who was part of the chocolate-making dynasty.
So how does sheep skin with Arabic written on it fit in chocolates?
Two things are proven here by this discovery
1. that text in Quran is indeed not altered
2. the age of Islam
Since he was priest so may be at that time if priests were sponsored by business tycoons ?
Well it depends on who sent whom for what purpose...If it was to extract knowledge then it would be cool but if it was to destroy previous text (as many some 1000 yrs ago were at wars and burning libraries) then one should be cautious of what they are trying to pass as the Quran ....We also know that there were a few people who claimed themselves as "prophets" some "priests" who wrote with their own hands ...if it is trying to preserve "THEIR" handiwork and pass it off as the Quran being changed....I would say oh o...Since he was priest so may be at that time if priests were sponsored by business tycoons ?
It could be the one he distributed or the one that survived the destruction of the others....would be interesting though...under the third caliph, Uthman ibn Affan, copies of the "definitive edition" were distributed.
Has this manuscript been compared to other later texts to prove that #1 is true?
.
Well it depends on who sent whom for what purpose...If it was to extract knowledge then it would be cool but if it was to destroy previous text (as many some 1000 yrs ago were at wars and burning libraries) then one should be cautious of what they are trying to pass as the Quran ....We also know that there were a few people who claimed themselves as "prophets" some "priests" who wrote with their own hands ...if it is trying to preserve "THEIR" handiwork and pass it off as the Quran being changed....I would say oh o...
It could be the one he distributed or the one that survived the destruction of the others....would be interesting though...
The news has quoted the experts who ran carbon test to determined the status of the script. I am saying on the basis of this expert opinion