OIC Peace Keeping Force for maintaining peace in majority Muslim countries

[Banglar Lathial]

Members beware!



This is probably a CIA shill trying to exacerbate Muslim infighting, and further Western agenda.


Whenever there is any talk of united Muslim world, a few known agents spring up to their Western masters' defence. These members would go to any length to either assume an excessively 'secular' posture to distance themselves from Islamic Unity (so that their Western masters are satisfied), but at the drop of a hat, then they would assume a very radical sectarian agenda, again to please their Western masters.


By no means is the hub of polytheistic Hindutva terror anything but the foremost enemies of Muslims of South Asia.


Muslims of South Asia, first and foremost, must eliminate the foremost threat against it before dealing with Iranian regime's incredibly low threats against the Sunni Muslims.

 

[rubyjackass]

The answer is an emphatic NO. OIC mandate do not extend to non-member states. They can raise these issues of Muslim minorities to other relevant authorities like UN. Besides most of these states with Muslim minorities are functioning states, so "peace keeping" is out of the question, even by UNPKF. But if there is such a failed state where Muslim minorities are being killed in large numbers, then that will be responsibility of UN or other regional bodies and their peace keeping forces, not OICPKF.

I am disappointed. The only utility seems to be to support autocratic regimes crush dissent which usually comes from minorities. And what happens when the army of Islam stands between a majority muslim regime and minority non-Mulsim rebels? When it comes to muslim rebels the PKF will defend the dominant sect, which is Sunni in all cases except Iran, Syria and may be Lebanon. What peacekeeping forces do is to prevent the natural tide of politics in the country. Basically keeping the pot boiling for longer.

 

[kalu_miah]

I am disappointed. The only utility seems to be to support autocratic regimes crush dissent which usually comes from minorities. And what happens when the army of Islam stands between a majority muslim regime and minority non-Mulsim rebels? When it comes to muslim rebels the PKF will defend the dominant sect, which is Sunni in all cases except Iran, Syria and may be Lebanon. What peacekeeping forces do is to prevent the natural tide of politics in the country. Basically keeping the pot boiling for longer.

Pot boiling is ok, if the killing is stopped and conflict is resolved by means other than violence and wholesale slaughter.

Asad is the autocratic regime in Syria crushing dissent, it looks like you have got it upside down there in your post.

 

[Echo_419]

how can we do it ? GCC says FSA should be in power (do not care about they are linked with Al-Qaeda), they just want Assad out. Let me tell you the truth, GCC is the main problem, fix GCC, 95% of muslim worlds problem will be solved. First democracy should be implemented in GCC than any other arab countries.

You Zionist Baniya
What Blashpmey are you talking

 

[rubyjackass]

Pot boiling is ok, if the killing is stopped and conflict is resolved by means other than violence and wholesale slaughter.

Asad is the autocratic regime in Syria crushing dissent, it looks like you have got it upside down there in your post.

What I am saying is that, you may be saving the rebels in Syria today. But tomorrow, in a country where the rebels are more powerful, you will be protecting the incumbent regime against the rebels. In fact, the situation on ground in Syria is looking more and more like the latter as time goes and money flows with arms into Syria.