What's new

OIC is now Organization of Islamic Cooperation

Some countries are members by virtue of having large Muslim populations. Among the new membership rules, it is mandatory that the country should have a Muslim majority and also be a member of the United Nations.

This doesn't make any sense. Already there are countries that are not Muslim majority. Some countries like Uganda have 12% Muslims only. Infact, Kazakhstan itself has less than 50% muslims. The picture of the FM of Togo that somebozo posted earlier under the heading "Islamic rapper" is not even a muslim. Muslims form 20% of Togo's population and he is most likely a follower of one of the indigenous tribal religions.

So why the need for having a muslim majority. Some really "smart" people coming up with these rules.

maybe it would be best for you if you actually read up more about the organization.....a country like Russia has a relatively small Muslim population and yet they have what is called OBSERVER STATUS
 
.
Kazakhstan has 70.3 % Muslims :coffee:

Not sure where you got that from but CIA fact book indicates that there are 47% Muslims there. It still doesn't change the fact that there are 8-10 countries mostly from Africa that have like 10-12 % Muslims like Uganda and Togo.

And the other excuse, disputed borders, Iran is still occupying three islands that the UAE claims, while Afghanistan and Pakistan have a dispute over the Durrand line.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/kz.html
 
.
maybe it would be best for you if you actually read up more about the organization.....a country like Russia has a relatively small Muslim population and yet they have what is called OBSERVER STATUS
I think you didn't understand what I wrote. What I explained was there are countries right now in the OIC that have less than 50% of the OIC like Togo and Uganda but are still full members of the OIC.

India was part of the founding members of the OIC in 1969 in Rabat. you can't change this historical fact. So that makes India different than any other country per se. But ofcourse, President Yahya Khan did is blackmail threat that Pakistan will boycott OIC if India is included and that was the end of it.
 
.
And for those interested here is the opening address by the OIC secretary general

Address Of H.E. Prof. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, OIC Secretary General, To The 38Th Session Of The Council Of Foreign Ministers
Your Excellency
Honorable Ministers,
Excellencies
Ladies and Gentlemen,

I am deeply honored to address the opening session of the 38th session of OIC Council of Foreign Ministers taking place in this beautiful and modern city of Astana. I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate the government and people of Kazakhstan on the occasion of the 20th Anniversary of the independence of Kazakhstan and thank them for the warm welcome and hospitality. With its peacefully active policy on international scene, Kazakhstan was able to maintain its Muslim identity yet remain on track forward modernization. This is yet another sign of Kazakhstan’s preparedness to lead the Ummah in this difficult time of our history. I wish to commend Kazakhstan under the able leadership of H.E President Nursultan Nazarbayev for hosting and successfully organizing this conference.

My thanks and gratitude also go to the Republic of Tajikistan, Chairman of the 37th CFM for its sincere efforts throughout the past year in assuming its Chairmanship of the CFM.
Excellencies,
It will be observed from my reports on the work of the Organisation that the OIC has been able, thanks to your support, to achieve many targets in favor of our Ummah and its causes.

The OIC has come a long way to make its impact felt not only within its Member States but internationally as well. Many circles at the regional and international levels have expressed their continued interest in nurturing a sustained dialogue and in opening lines of communication with our Organization.

Inspired by the new vision and lofty objectives of the Charter and the TYPOA we have managed to elevate the OIC profile that have endowed the OIC with greater significance which engender respect and trust. I can confidently say that the OIC now enjoy greater visibility at the international scene and has become more active and an indispensible actor among international institutions.

Excellencies,
As we gather here in Astana to begin our deliberations, I seek your indulgence to make a few remarks about the situation in the Muslim World within the context of the current international climate. Today, as we speak, the Muslim World is confronted with some serious developments with direct impact on its stability, unity, prosperity and development. Unfortunately, the Ummah- in certain parts- still lacks the necessary internal cohesion, strength, solidarity and capacity that are required in order to overcome these daunting challenges.

The Muslim world is going through a defining moment in its history, which further affirms the dire need to speed up the process of concretizing the peoples’ aspiration to good governance, the rule of law, human rights, broader political participation and dedicated national dialogue.
The OIC Charter and the TYPOA are guided by the principles of moderation and modernization. Both documents are based on a perceptive vision that carries in its folds appropriate solutions for such unrest as we are witnessing today in the Muslim world. This is an opportune occasion for me to renew my appeal to all our Member States to kindly see to the implementation of the Ten-Year Programme of Action, particularly in the domain of good governance and rule of law.

Referring to the recent events in North Africa, I would like to welcome the democratic changes in Tunisia and Egypt as a result of an internal popular revolution in these countries. During my recent visits to these two countries I expressed the hope that these changes would strengthen good governance, rule of law, democracy and economic development in them.

We call for a political solution to the Libyan crisis based on the recognition of the legitimate aspirations of the Libyan people for democracy, justice, rule of law and political reforms. I have dispatched a high level delegation to Tripoli last week and urged for ending violence against civilians as well as providing unhindered access for humanitarian relief. We have also intensified our contacts with the Transitional National Council.

The OIC was following with deep concern the violent events witnessed in a number of cities in Syria. We have called for national dialogue and a speedy implementation for the reforms declared by the Syrian leadership in order to stop violence targeting both civilians and security forces.

The recent developments in Yemen confirm our reiterated appeals to all the parties for the need of exercising self-restraint as well as the need to solve the current crisis through dialogue and understanding to guarantee security and stability of Yemen and peaceful transition of power in this country.

We have supported the all-inclusive national dialogue in Bahrain to reach the aspired national consensus. We reiterate our call to all parties in Bahrain to respond positively to the call for dialogue and give precedence to the supreme national interest of Bahrain.

Honorable Ministers,

Developments in Palestine remain of great concern for us. Israel’s practices in occupied Al-Quds continue to pose a serious threat to the sanctities and interests of the Ummah. Settlement activities, attempts to Judaize Al-Quds, uprooting its indigenous Palestinian population and confiscating their homes and properties have escalated and reached alarming rates in the past few months.

Israel’s violations and refusal to honor agreements with the Palestinians, and its flouting of international law and conventions have resulted in a stalemate in the peace process. It is our duty and firm position, therefore, to support the Palestinian decision to resort to the United Nations and have its say in the solution of this protracted conflict. As I speak here, 116 countries so far have recognized the State of Palestine including 55 from OIC Member States. We urge countries including OIC Member States and Observers to recognize Palestine on the borders of 1967 with East Jerusalem as its capital.

The OIC has come to be accepted as a major player in all international and regional initiatives on Afghanistan. The establishment of the new OIC Permanent Representative’s Office in Kabul will further enhance the role of the Organization along with other partners. Consistent with our strong commitment to Afghanistan, the OIC General Secretariat hosted the ICG meeting on Afghanistan in its headquarters in Jeddah on 3 March 2011. We are also planning to organize a conference of Ulamas as part of our efforts to contribute to the reconciliation process in Afghanistan. We welcomed the recent positive developments in Afghanistan-Pakistan relations following the latest visit by President Karzai to Islamabad.

Recently, I paid an official visit to Iraq and had important talks with the high level Iraqi officials on ways and means to strengthen the cooperation between Iraq and OIC. We agreed on engaging a more comprehensive initiative on the strengthening of the Sunni-Shia relations on the basis of the Makkah Declaration of 2006 which helped the Iraqi national reconciliation.

In the Sudan, I urged both parties to negotiate in good faith pre and post-referendum arrangements related to the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA). In this regard, we welcomed the recent agreement between the parties to demilitarize the disputed area of Abyei and urged for self restraint in Southern Kordofan. I also welcomed the adoption of the Doha Document by the conference of the stakeholders on Darfur, which met in Doha on 27-31 May 2011.

In Somalia, I have continued to mobilize the Member States to extend all forms of assistance to Somalia. As we approached the end of the transitional period, we urged the Transitional Federal Government to remain focus on the national reconciliation process so as to complete the remaining important tasks under the transitional period.

I am pleased to inform you that I have just completed a tour in early June 2011 which took me to seven African countries: Benin, Togo, Sierra Leone, Guinea Bissau, Gambia, Senegal and Niger. During this trip, we have been able to measure the growing interest of African leaders to be more involved with the OIC activities and intra-OIC cooperation. I also seized this opportunity to raise issues related to joint cooperation with the OIC on the political, economic, social, scientific, educational and cultural fields.

I would like to welcome the positive developments which took place in Côte d’Ivoire on 11th April 2011 following the restoration of constitutional normalcy which allowed H.E. Dr. Alassane Dramane Ouattara, the democratically elected President to assume the office.

The political situation in Guinea and Niger has hopefully evolved in a positive direction. The active engagement of the OIC and other partners in the international community has borne fruits and the two countries are on the way to restoring durable democracy.

The situation in Kashmir, Turkish Cypriot State, Kosovo, occupied Azerbaijani territories including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and Bosnia Herzegovina have continued to be a matter of concern to the OIC.

Excellencies,

In a bid to better serve the interests of Muslims and the Muslim Ummah, we have been keen to develop channels of communications with the world leaders and fora where the global and important issues are taken. It is in this context that I take from time to time some missions to achieve this objective. During my official visit to Washington DC last April I was received by US President Obama and met senior officials of the U.S. administration as well as members of the American Congress. Our discussions touched upon a number of issues of concern to the Islamic world. In my recent visit to London, I was received by the Prime Minister and met the Foreign Minister. We agreed to develop a joint framework of dialogue and cooperation between the OIC and the UK on some selected areas such as development aid, humanitarian assistance, science and technology, interfaith dialogue and combating intolerance. I also discussed in my recent visit to Brussels possible ways and means to further strengthening the bilateral relations including joint cooperation with European Union in development fields.

The OIC has deployed dedicated efforts to set the ground for an eventual and peaceful resolution to the political conflict between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF), just as we have strived to build greater momentum to enhance coordination and unity of purpose between the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and Moro Islamic Liberation Front MILF for the sake of peace and development of the Bangsamoro people.

On the case of Muslims in Myanmar, a convention was held at the OIC General Secretariat last May with the participation of senior leaders representing many Rohingya Associations. The convention reached a consensual and milestone agreement to set up the “Arakan Rohingya Union” (ARU),

On the situation of Muslims in Southern Thailand, we do hope that the new Thai Government will make good progress on the pledges taken by its predecessor government to work out a fair and feasible political solution to the conflict in Southern Thailand in line with the communiqué I jointly signed with the Thai Foreign Minister back in 2007.

On a brighter note, I should highlight that our relations with both the People’s Republic of China and the Kingdom of Thailand have been recently tangibly fostered in the wake of highly successful visits that I undertook to both countries.

In a similar vein, we are pursuing our efforts to improve the conditions of Muslims in other parts of the world, notably in Greece and Bulgaria, with the objective of boosting our relations with these countries while shying away from any interference in their internal affairs.

Excellencies,

In the area of economic cooperation, you are well aware of the progress made in the domain of trade financing and execution of our various poverty alleviation strategies. The implementation of our Executive Programme for Enhancing intra-OIC trade has brought out total financing package of US$ 36 billion through the respective activities of Islamic Centre for Development of Trade (ICDT) and Islamic Development Bank (IDB) Group.

It is in this regard I am glad to convey to this august gathering that the protocol on the Rules of Origin for the OIC Trade Preferential System entered into force after getting the required number of ratifications which signifies the beginning of new era of the creation of OIC trade preferential system for a strong OIC market of US$ 1.3 trillion.

In addition to scaling up of interventions under the Islamic Solidarity Fund for Development and Special Programme for the Development of Africa, the issues of mobilizing resources for these programmes are high on the agenda of OIC General Secretariat. It is my sincere hope that the proposed mission of OIC Eminent Persons Group will receive your kind support.

Very soon, our Ministers of Agriculture will be considering a comprehensive Framework for OIC Member States which will represent the beginning of an action-oriented plan to foster agricultural growth, rural development and food security and achieve poverty alleviation and socio-economic empowerment.

Similarly, regional collaboration for increased intra-OIC economic cooperation has also been intensified with such organisations as African Union/NEPAD, WAEMU, BADEA, and ECO. This collaboration has been effective for the implementation of our projects on Dakar-Port Sudan Railway; the OIC Cotton Action Plan, and Cross Border Parks and Protected Areas in West Africa, to mention a few.
Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

Islamophobia poses a clear danger to international efforts geared towards peace stability and security, in both the regional as well as the global context.

The OIC Islamophobia Observatory continues to monitor Islamophobic acts and events on a daily basis. The fourth report of the Observatory being released today catalogues and analyses events from June 2010 to May 2011 indicating a worrying trend of increase in Islamophobia reflected not only in the European context but an emerging upsurge across the Atlantic.

I must commend the efforts of the OIC Ambassadorial Groups in New York and Geneva towards sustaining support for the OIC sponsored resolution on defamation of religion. I presented– at the 15th Session of the UN Human Rights Council in September 2010 - an eight point approach for action, at the national and the international levels, aimed at addressing this issue of utmost significance on a consensual basis. I am glad that this alternative approach found resonance with all negotiating partners including US and EU, and formed the basis of a new OIC sponsored resolution on “Combating Intolerance, Negative Stereotyping and Stigmatization of, and Discrimination Incitement to Violence, and Violence Against Persons Based on Religion and Belief” which was adopted by consensus at the 16th Session of the Human Rights Council.

Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

OIC is on the verge of establishing an Independent Permanent Commission on Human Rights (IPCHR). We have been acting swiftly, through an open and credible process, in taking concrete steps toward establishing the IPCHR. The adoption of the Commissions statute followed by election of experts that would form the Commission must be seen as a landmark exercise that would make the Astana CFM stand out in the history of the OIC. It would enable us to launch the Commission and hold its first session later this year.

Women, children and youth are among the vulnerable sectors of our societies. Our efforts are accordingly focused on eliminating discrimination, violence and other injustices and protection of their rights. I urge the Member States to expedite the signing and ratification procedures to facilitate the operationalization of the statute of the Cairo based Center on Women Development.

Progress in science and technology is crucial for the socio-economic development of the Muslim world and for enabling the Member States to deal with the contemporary challenges of climate change, energy, food and water security and the threat of diseases and pandemics.

In higher education, health and environment, important ongoing OIC projects in these fields include the Atlas of Islamic World Science and Innovation, the Mega Project on Communication satellites, preparation of a document on “Key Performance Indicators for Universities in the Islamic World”, cooperative action involving international partners such as the WHO, Global Polio Eradication Initiative and Global Fund to fight diseases and epidemics, OIC-US mother and child health projects in Mali and Bangladesh and the preparation of OIC Water Vision.

In the domain of higher education we need to examine new initiatives for utilizing the existing institutions and platforms for promoting cultural exchange and sharing of knowledge and experience through more structured interaction.
In the area of humanitarian action, the General Secretariat has put in significant efforts in offering relief to the victims of the natural catastrophes that hit a number of our Member States and observers including, Palestine, Afghanistan, Yemen, Indonesia, Sudan, Somalia, Niger, Burkina Faso, the Comoro Islands, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Bosnia Herzegovina and Pakistan.

I am also honored to inform you that after years of deliberations at the level of senior officials, consensus was finally reached on the draft rules governing the Observer Status at the OIC and they are currently under review for adoption by this esteemed Council.

In implementation of the requisites of the TYPOA, I have the honour to inform you that the senior officials meeting preparatory to this esteemed council recommended for approval of the new logo and proposed name which reads “Organisation of Islamic Cooperation”. This name has the advantage of preserving of the Organisation acronym OIC. The new logo bears all the symbols of Islamic Ummah. I hope that both the new name and logo will get your valuable endorsement.

In conclusion, let me entertain the hope that the deliberations of this historic session of the CFM will not go down in the record as mere expectations and wishful thinking of expressions of good intention. That is not what we have gathered for. Let us translate the words into deeds, the intentions into meaningful actions and the premises into facts of history. Our organization derives its power from the devotion and support of its Member States and the entire Ummah. It can be an effective instrument of peace, stability and economic development to the extent its Members want it to be. So let us back it with all our force in unshakable conviction and genuine sincerity.

I thank you for your kind attention.
 
. .
LOL EJAZR THERE IS NO DISPUTE BETWEEN PAKISTAN AND AFGHANISTAN OVER THE DURAND LINE.
THERE WAS NO EXPIRY DATE ON THE DOCUMENT BETWEEN THE BRITISHERS AND AFGHANISTAN AND THE UN RECOGNIZES THIS.
SERIOUSLY AM I THE ONLY ONE ANSWERING MISINFORMATION?

Sigh, where is RR?
 
.
Welcome to Al Qaeda clubs... Uncooperation, backstabbing, and weak countries.

Pakistan must leave this group.
 
.
Well,
EjazR according to an authentic Kazakhstani website it SAYS KAZAKHSTAN HAS A MUSLIM MAJORITY of 70.2%.
THIS IS ACCORDING TO AN OFFICIAL KAZAKHSTANI WEBSITE.
ITS EVEN IN RUSSIAN. YOU CAN TRANSLATE THE WEBSITE IF YOU WANT.
HERE IT IS:http://www.stat.kz/news/Pages/n2_12_11_10.aspx


Итоги национальной переписи населения 2009 года


12.11.2010

Итоги национальной переписи населения 2009 года

Численность населения Республики Казахстан по итогам переписи населения 2009 года составила 16009,6 тыс. человек.
За межпереписной период численность населения республики увеличилась на 1028,3 тыс. человек, прирост численности населения по сравнению с предыдущей переписью 1999 года составил 6,9%.

Численность городского населения составила 8662,4 тыс. человек, сельского – 7347,2 тыс. человек. При этом численность городского населения увеличилась на 206,6 тыс. человек или на 2,4%, а сельского – на 821,7 тыс. человек или на 12,6%. Доля городского населения в стране составила 54,1%, сельского – 45,9%, в 1999 году их соотношение составляло 56,4% и 43,6% соответственно. Самыми урбанизированными регионами являются Карагандинская (здесь городское население составляет более 77,5%), Павлодарская (68%) и Актюбинская (61%) области. Сельское население в основном сконцентрировано в Алматинской (76,9% от всего населения), Северо-Казахстанской (60,2%), Кызылординской (58,1%) и Жамбылской (60,4%) областях.

Численность мужчин составила 7712,2 тыс. человек, женщин – 8297,4 тыс. человек. Численность мужчин по сравнению с предыдущей переписью увеличилась на 496,8 тыс. человек или на 6,9%; численность женщин увеличилась на 531,5 тыс. человек или на 6,8%. Соотношение численности мужчин и женщин сложилось с перевесом доли женского населения над мужским (51,8% и 48,2% соответственно). По переписям населения 1999 и 2009 годов на каждые 1000 женщин приходилось 929 мужчин.

Изменение численности отдельных этносов за межпереписной период характеризуется следущими данными:

Численность казахов увеличилась по сравнению с предыдущей переписью на 26,0% и составила 10096,8 тыс. человек. Увеличилась численность узбеков на 23,3%, составив 457,0 тыс. человек, уйгур - на 6,8%, составив 224,7 тыс. человек. Снизилась численность русских на 15,3%, составив 3793,8 тыс. человек; немцев - на 49,5%, составив 178,4 тыс. человек; украинцев – на 39,1%, составив 333,0 тыс. человек; татар – на 18,0%, составив 204,2 тыс. человек; других этносов – на 4,8%, составив 721,7 тыс. человек.

Доля казахов в общей численности населения страны составила 63,1%, русских – 23,7%, узбеков – 2,9%, украинцев – 2,1%, уйгур – 1,4%, татар - 1,3%, немцев – 1,1%, других этносов – 4,5%.

В общей численности населения составили - 15850,7 тыс. граждане Республики Казахстан (99,0 % всего населения страны), граждане других государств – 101,6 тыс. (0,6 %) и 57,3 тыс. (0,4 %) без гражданства.

В Казахстане указали вероисповедание ислам 11237,9 тыс. человек или 70,2 % от общей численности населения, христианство 4190,1 тыс. (26,2 %), иудаизм - 5,3 тыс. (0,0 %), буддизм - 14,6 тыс. (0,1 %) и другое - 30,1 тыс. (0,2 %). Неверующими назвались - 2,8 % (450,5 тыс. человек) и отказались указать 0,5 % (81,0 тыс. человек).

Численность населения республики на 1 октября 2010 года по оперативным данным с учетом переписи населения 2009 года составила 16372 тыс. человек. Численность казахов составила 10458 тыс. человек, доля в общей численности населения 63,9%.

Об итогах переписи населения Республики Казахстан 2009 года


The Translation:


Results of a national census in 2009


11/12/2010

Results of a national census in 2009

The population of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the basis of the 2009 national census was in 1600 nine , six thousand people.
During the period between censuses the population of the republic increased by 1028.3 thousand people, population growth, compared with the previous census in 1999 was 6, 9 %.

The urban population amounted to 8662.4 thousand people, rural population - 7347.2 thousand people. In this case, the urban population increased by 206.6 thousand persons or 2, 4 %, and rural - to 821.7 thousand people or 12, 6 %. The urban population in the country was 54 , 1 %, agriculture - 45.9% in 1999, the ratio was 56.4% and 43.6% respectively. The most urbanized regions are Karaganda (where the urban population of more than 77.5%), Pavlodar (68%) and Aktobe (61%) of the region. The rural population is mainly concentrated in Almaty (76.9% of total population), North Kazakhstan (60.2%), Kyzyl-Orda (58.1%) and Zhambyl (60.4%) regions.

Number of men amounted to 7712.2 thousand men, women - 82 97.4 thousand people. The number of men compared with the previous census has increased by 496.8 thousand persons or 6.9%, the number of women increased by 531.5 thousand persons or 6.8%. Proportion of men and women formed a margin percentage of female population over the male (51.8% and 48.2% respectively). Census 1999 population and 2009 per 1000 women accounted for 929 men.

Changing the number of individual ethnic groups during the intercensal period is characterized by the data you next:

The number of Kazakhs increased compared with the previous census of 26, 0 % to 1009 six , eight thousand people. Increased numbers of Uzbeks 23.3%, reaching 457.0 thousand people, the Uighurs - a 6.8% to $ 224.7 thousand. Decreased the number of Russian 15.3%, to 3793.8 thousand man, the Germans - by 49.5% to $ 178.4 thousand, Ukrainians - 39.1% to $ 333.0 thousand people, the Tatars - by 18.0% to $ 204.2 thousand people; other ethnic groups - by 4.8% to $ 721.7 thousand people .

The share of Kazakhs in the country's total population was 63.1%, Russian - 23.7%, Uzbeks - 2.9%, Ukrainians - 2.1%, Uighur - 1,4%, Tatars - 1,3%, Germans - 1.1%, other nationalities - 4.5%.

In the total population amounted to - 15850.7 thousand citizens of the Republic of Kazakhstan (99.0% of the total population), citizens of other states - 101.6 thousand (0.6%) and 57.3 thousand (0.4% ) without citizenship.

Kazakhstan has indicated religion Islam 11237.9 thousand or 70.2% of the total population, Christianity is 4190.1 thousand (26.2%), Judaism - 5.3 million (0.0%), Buddhism - 14.6 thousand (0.1%) and more - 30.1 thousand (0.2%). Non-believers were called - 2.8% (450.5 thousand) and refused to provide 0.5% (81.0 thousand).

The population of the republic on October 1 2010 according to operative data, taking into account the population census of 2009 was 16 372 thousand people. The number of Kazakhs made ​​up 10 458 thousand people, the proportion of the total population of 63.9%.

On the results of census of Republic of Kazakhstan in 2009


My Comments:
The CIA can say whatever they like, but I'm going to trust the Kazakhstani government, because the Kazakhstanis would know better about their country.

Seriously I'm getting tired of trolls like EjazR.
 
.
I think you didn't understand what I wrote. What I explained was there are countries right now in the OIC that have less than 50% of the OIC like Togo and Uganda but are still full members of the OIC.

India was part of the founding members of the OIC in 1969 in Rabat. you can't change this historical fact. So that makes India different than any other country per se. But ofcourse, President Yahya Khan did is blackmail threat that Pakistan will boycott OIC if India is included and that was the end of it.

I can understand Indian have their curry burning when it comes to OIC but come on..India as a founding memeber of OIC is akin to joke of bad taste.
India was banned from having any status in OIC in part due to its role in sepration of East-Pakistan and its continued supression of Muslims in Jammu and Kashmir. Yahya Khan did not blackmail but only played the logical argument that if India was to be allowed then Israel must be allowed too because it has sizeable population of Muslims and resolution of status-less palestinean disporsa depends on negotiation with Israel plus it is located in Middle East which is predominantly Arab and Muslim.

As a result both, Israel and India are banned from having any status in OIC.

The Middle East's Leading English Language Daily



Sunday 11 October 2009 (21 Shawwal 1430)


Time to end India’s isolation in OIC
Abdulaziz Sager | Arab News —


As the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) enters the fourth decade of its existence, it is an opportune moment to introspect on its continued isolation of India — a country that has the largest Muslim population in the world after Indonesia.

With a membership of 57 countries spread over four continents, constituting 1.5 billion people and a combined GDP of about seven trillion dollars, the OIC is the second largest inter-governmental group after the United Nations.

The grouping identifies itself to be “the collective voice of the Muslim world” to “safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world in the spirit of promoting international peace and harmony among various people of the world”.

On the eve of his historic visit to India in 2006, Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Abdullah said that “India should have an observer status in the OIC” and it would be “beneficial” if Pakistan proposes India’s candidature.

Pakistan, however, objected that any country wishing to get observer status with the OIC, “should not be involved in any dispute with a member state.”

And, therein lies the reason that has hindered the OIC-India relationship since the Islamic Summit Conference in Rabat in 1969, which was held in the backdrop of the desecration of the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Occupied Jerusalem.

King Faisal played a key role in ensuring that India was invited to the conference because the issue being discussed was not a matter concerning only “Muslim countries”, but all Muslims. And, India, with its huge Muslim population, was seen as a stakeholder, apart from the fact that the Indian head of state at that time was a Muslim — Zakir Hussain.

The head of the Indian delegation even addressed the gathering. However, Indo-Pak differences led Islamabad to keep India out for the remaining sessions of the conference and all summits thereafter.

Since then, until as recently as the first week of October this year, when the OIC appointed a special envoy for Jammu and Kashmir, the politics of the subcontinent has drawn a wedge between the organization and India.

The OIC stresses that as long as the Indo-Pak tension over Kashmir remains unresolved, there is very little room for improvement in the organization’s relations with India.

While the OIC advocates the issue of self-determination and resolution of Kashmir in accordance with the UN resolutions of 1948 and 1949, India is firm about resolving the issue bilaterally with Pakistan.

This stand has been receiving increasing international acceptance, and appears to be the most viable option to resolve the Kashmir issue.

The debate here is not about Kashmir or about Pakistan. The larger concern is the Muslim world and what it stands to gain with India finding a foothold in the OIC. It is also natural that India would also gain reciprocal diplomatic benefits through such a move.

While the longstanding Kashmir issue is important enough to be resolved not only for the sake of the people therein, peace in the subcontinent and the Asian continent at large, it is equally important for the OIC to look beyond this issue and address more pressing concerns of the Muslim world. It must also be argued that while the OIC Charter stipulates that only Muslim countries willing to promote the objectives of the organization are eligible for membership, many non-Muslim countries have secured observer status and even full membership. The most recent is Russia, which came on board as an observer in 2005, two years after then President Vladimir Putin declared that Russia was a “Muslim power” that desired to play a role among Muslim countries. With less than 25 million Muslims in its ranks, the real reason may have well been Moscow’s attempt to assuage the Muslims over Chechnya and increase its influence in the Islamic world in order to tip the balance in its favor in its power politics with Washington.

Thailand — a predominantly Buddhist country — received the same recognition in 1998. It is also an irony of sorts that the Non-Aligned Movement, of which India is a founding member and has several non-Muslim countries, got observer status in 1977. Why not India, then?

India is making rapid progress in terms of its influence in the international arena, not just as a trillion-dollar economic powerhouse, but also as a military and technological giant, all combining to make it a political heavyweight.

Given the current buoyant state of the Indian economy amid a bleak world scenario, India’s formal association with the OIC could help forge mutually beneficial economic deals.

Equally important are factors that were highlighted by Hamid Ansari in 2006. The former diplomat and current Indian vice president said India deserves to be an OIC member, not just an observer, because though India is not a part of the Muslim world, “it is not away from it; not a Muslim majority state in statistical terms yet host to the second largest community of Muslims in the world; not a society focused on Muslim welfare only but one in which Muslims, as an integral part of a larger whole, get the attention that every other section does.”

As a result, a formal place for India in the OIC would add to the collective credibility and bargaining power of the organization. The OIC would be able to leverage India in relation to important issues of the Muslim world. This would help the OIC address the “state of disunity” among Muslims, which many see as one of the worst in 14 centuries of Islamic history.

In a post-9/11 21st century, the Muslim world faces numerous challenges — poverty, terrorism, calls for political reform and unemployment. In addressing these and implementing the Ten-Year Program of Action that was laid out at the OIC Summit in Makkah in 2005, India’s experiences would be more of an asset than a liability — especially envisaging joint action to promote tolerance and moderation, modernization, extensive reforms in all spheres of activities including science and technology, education, trade, and good governance and promotion of human rights.

With more than 150 million Muslims, most of them part of the world’s largest democratic process, India deserves to be associated with the OIC. It is also important to note that many OIC members are sympathetic to the idea.

At the same time, one needs to also see the issue from the angle that by denying India any role in the OIC, one is, in fact, abandoning the duty of promoting the interests of the Muslim population of India.

Thus, just like summits have been called in the past to search for common ground among members of the Muslim world on various issues, would it be too far-fetched to call another to find consensus over formalizing India’s OIC connection?

— Abdulaziz Sager is chairman of the Gulf Research Center. He can be contacted at: sager@grc.ae






Copyright: Arab News © 2003 All rights reserved. Site designed by: arabix
 
.
@somebozo

Its tiring to keep teaching you history. You have an internet connection and could have done some research yourself. OIc was formed in 1969, there was no 1971 war then. But do check out these links,

Here is the Morrocan ambassador narrating what happened when OIC was founded in 1969 in Morocco.
When Mr. Singh, responding to the phone call, reached the OIC venue, the Moroccan Foreign Minister was waiting outside the conference venue to receive him. Laraki told the envoy that King Faisal of Saudi Arabia had proposed, the King of Morocco had seconded, and all other participants had unanimously agreed that India should be invited to sit at the OIC table as a member. ``I obviously inquired whether Pakistan was part of the unanimous invitation. I was told that was the case,'' Mr. Singh said at his Kasturba Gandhi Marg residence this afternoon.

And then, without further ado, Mr. Singh was made the "acting leader" of the Indian delegation even though he had suggested that a visiting Indian Muslim academic take up the job pending the arrival of a full delegation from New Delhi. So, Mr. Singh, a turbaned Sikh, was the "acting leader" and Abdul Alim, then Vice-Chancellor of the Aligarh Muslim University, and Ishrat Aziz, Second Secretary at the Indian Embassy, were the other members of the Indian delegation. ``I addressed the OIC meeting at about 5 p.m. The Shah of Iran was seated next to me. I thanked all those present for the invitation and said, god willing, an Indian delegation would arrive to attend the Conference as soon as possible," he said. The next day, the then Agriculture Minister, Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, arrived in Rabat at the head of an Indian delegation for the conference, and they were received with full protocol and honours by the Moroccan hosts. Like other delegations, they were provided a villa to stay.

Now started the real problem. The Pakistani President, Yahya Khan, who was attending the meeting, threw a fit and insisted that Indian participation was not on. So, what was the reason for Pakistan's volte face?

"A number of messages had reached Yahya from Pakistan that if he sat at the same table as an Indian at an Islamic meeting he might as well not return home," Mr. Singh recalled

Also read The Hindu : Opinion / Leader Page Articles : The OIC and India: signals of a re-think and Why India didn't make it to OIC - Times Of India

And there is no comparison between Israel and India here. Israel had demolished parts of Al Aqsa mosque which was condemned even by India. Currently India has 180 million Muslims while combines Israel/Palestine Muslim population is not more than 10 million.

@Pakshah
Even if the Kazakhfigures are correct what about Uganda or Togo e.t.c. that are NOT Muslim majority countries and neither have Muslim head of states.
And Iran-UAE have disputes. Pakistan might be happy with the Durrand line, but even the Taliban did not agree to recognize it.
 
.
Oh btw, let me clarify again that an organization that does not include 12% of the world's Muslim population will not be claiming to speak for the Muslim ummah. Maybe this is the reason why it has failed to accomplish anything more than grandstanding speeches. This doesn't mean that India is or should be clamoring for OIC membership. Infact, only if the OIC request it then India may think about it.

On its own, India has friendly relations with almost all other OIC countries. No one, including OIC talks about the UN resolutions and there is no pressure that they are applying because they know the false basis of the Kashmir issue that keeps being brought up due to Pakistani compulsions.
 
.
indian (and israeli) admission into OIC is OUT of the question. Will never happen.

as for Kashmir issue, it is not just "because of Pakistani compulsions"

it is one of the core issues commonly discussed and hopefully now with the new changes made, more will be done to highlight the plight of Muslims under siege in OCCUPIED Kashmir

http://www.defence.pk/forums/kashmi...es-kashmir-issue-added-final-declaration.html





regards
 
.
Welcome to Al Qaeda clubs... Uncooperation, backstabbing, and weak countries.

Pakistan must leave this group.

not only this its also waste millions of dollars which we can spend some were else in pakistan . god damn Muslim puppets sit talk go away and laugh .its OICCCCCCCCCCCCC
 
.
@EjazR,

lol
THE UN RECOGNIZES THE AGREEMENT NOT HAVING AN EXPIRY DATE BETWEEN THE THE AFGHANISTANIS AND BRITISHERS AS VALID.
THE TALIBAN, HAMID KARZAI, AND YOU CAN SAY ANYTHING YOU LIKE. THIS HAS BEEN DEBUNKED TOO MANY TIMES. PAKISTAN HAS NOTHING TO GIVE TO AFGHANISTAN.

If AFGHANISTAN has such a problem with PAKISTAN, why doesn't it raise this issue to UN, or better yet the OIC.
Otherwise, EjazR you have been proven wrong!

I'm not quite sure how to answer about the Togo or Uganda, AS I HAVE NOT DONE RESEARCH, however there may be exemptions to the general rules.

The Iranian-UAE islands dispute is not as volatile as the Pakistani-Indian dispute.
The OIC supports Pakistan's stance on Kashmir.

I see some members saying OIC as an organization has not accomplished much.
I believe the OIC is important, because it is the voice of most of the muslims and muslim majority countries in the world.
People just need to be patient.

@EjazR
LOL
If you think OIC is not that important to India and India should only consider membership if "OIC requests", why do you make such a big deal out of then?
Hypocrisy at best!
 
.
I agree.

in all honesty, no need to feed these indian trolls....you tell them something, they will just continue to bibble-babble till sundown
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom