Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
wah Modi g wah!Just joy being a cheerleader does change the fact as well..
Why are you posting a tweet of some random guy falsely claiming that the NYT is reporting American intel assessment of 12 PLA KIA ?I have already told many times... Chinese casualties was between 12 to 15.
i have confirmed information but can not tell about the source details.
so it means that indian claim of victoy and more than 40 chinese soldiers have been debunked.New York Times is widely regarded as one of the most reputed newspapers in the world and has won more Pulitzer prizes (top journlaism prize) than any other media organization.
India has not officially claimed anything about losses on the other side.so it means that indian claim of victoy and more than 40 chinese soldiers have been debunked.
Humiliated again.
so indian media have always fooled indians and make them dance on fake victories.India has not officially claimed anything about losses on the other side.
China have chosen to not say a word and buried both the news and, possibly, any KIA soldiers.
Don't judge India from the ridiculous prime time news shows or from bollywood etc, you do so at your own peril.
CCP has decided to not share details. Some of their state controlled media did put out that they suffered casualties in sort of hushed tones but that news was tightly controlled domestically and they're not saying anything.so indian media have always fooled indians and make them dance on fake victories.
But indian government including modi also were brainwashed by indian media claims and they made such statements.
You blind or what Nilu?Why are you posting a tweet of some random guy falsely claiming that the NYT is reporting American intel assessment of 12 PLA KIA ?
The article makes no mention of anything of the sort.
Oops, I stand corrected.You blind or what Nilu?
The quote is directly from this para in the NYT article. Learn to read properly
This article proves nothing. And how you come on conclusion that it 12 to 15?I have already told many times... Chinese casualties was between 12 to 15.
i have confirmed information but can not tell about the source details.
This article proves nothing. And how you come on conclusion that it 12 to 15?
China lost more than 40 .it is confirmed. I can tell you... I have military sources but unfortunately can't reveal. Its confidential sources.
What do you make of the CCP's secrecy though ?Lol....the military sources of yours did not know how to count more than 40? Tell them it is 41...42...43...44 etc