KS
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2010
- Messages
- 12,528
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Let me put it the other way, Nuclear Weapons have actually prevented both the countries from going to a full-fledged war!!!
Hence, saved lives of thousands of civilians and more importantly of soldiers on both ends.
( -the role of Pakistan's weapon of detterance fulfilled!!)
In today's world Nuclear weapon is a show piece for countries to say, don't mess with me!!
Personally, i don't think India would ever go for a war on such a case, no matter what the situation is. And even if a war had happened that would have been an act of stupidity.
I agree Nukes have made the world a more safer place...But also has given immunity to those responsible for strikes like Mumbai.
The conventional superiority of India over Pakistan hasnt reached to a level where India could just over run Pakistan even in a pre nuke environment. Pakistan always maintained a minimum credible deterrence against India.
So while India does enjoy superiority thanks to its size, dont get carried away because the results would have been pretty much the same.
And why would India ever want to over-run Pakistan.??
We just need to strike within a 100 kilometer from the border,inflict damages,destroy militant camps and then return .A question of occupation doesnt arise there.
For example the much quoted "surgical strikes" on the militant camps in P0K could have taken place without any fear of collateral damage due to the usage of nukes.