No...(actually yes..I just don't want to die)!
Wow,that makes two of us.Apni ki fb te a6en bhai??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No...(actually yes..I just don't want to die)!
DRDO should make Sudarshan Chakras as well for our Soldiers!
Yep...there are more of us here in PDF!Wow,that makes two of us.Apni ki fb te a6en bhai??
When India is not only claiming western achievement as their own, but claiming Klingon war bird cloaking devise as their invention, you know that they have reach a new level of lunacy. I won't be surprised that some of these guys go through various series of Star Trek and claim those sci-fi inventions as Indian inventions.
OK. So do tell me, where in our heritage or ancient scriptures is visual invisibility of an aircraft detailed? In which ancient work is the technical knowhow elaborated?
I can assure you that you have no idea what you are talking about. For one thing, gravitaional lensing wasn't recently discovered - it's how Einstein's general theory of relativity was put on a solid empirical foundation, by Eddington's famous experiment in 1919. The phenomenon was then expounded in much greater detail by Einstein in a paper in 1936.We can only deal with the Newtonian laws yet, even the quantum has not been able to reach to any level. Recent discovery of gravitational lensing is one example of how light can be deviated with the use of magnetic fields and creating a false image to the viewer. But on earth human is not able to produce that energy but mathematically they have the equation.
The concept of invisibility is there, the Megnath, in Ramayan. The difference is, the mathematical modelling and simulation does not support it because, the tensors are not yet been formed in the modern science. I am personally being the student of electronics and I am aware that science has not yet reached the level of that complex knowledge. The today's science depends on mathematical modelling and equations. There are lots of things which human has proved to be possible mathematically but practically it is not the way it is. Just like they are trying to convert bigbang into a mathematical model, but that is not going to solve any issue.
I can assure you that you have no idea what you are talking about. For one thing, gravitaional lensing wasn't recently discovered - it's how Einstein's general theory of relativity was put on a solid empirical foundation, by Eddington's famous experiment in 1919. The phenomenon was then expounded in much greater detail by Einstein in a paper in 1936.
BTW in gravitational lensing, it is not a magnetic field that deflects the path of light. As the name clearly states, it is gravitational field that does it. Magnetic fields have nothing to do with it.
Anyway, that is NOT a technology that can in any way be used to create invisibility or low observability. That effect is about supermassive objects (like stars, or mocommonly, entire galaxies) bending the path of light by distorting space-time continuum in that region. The earth itself is not massive enough to deflect light to any appreciable degree, so you can forget about any man made objects utilizing that technology.
You really shouldn't put out anything and everything you have heard of and try to draw a connection to whatever it is you want to prove. Science doesn't work like that - you shouldn't talk about concepts unless you really know them.
The concept of invisibility can be there - any ten year old can dream up such things. Becoming invisible, flying in the air etc are some of thmost common dreams people have had since time immemorial. What I asked for was an ancient text that actullally details ways to achieve invisibility. The Ramayan says that the Pushpaka Vimaan can fly, but that doesn't mean they actually had any aeronautical knowledge - it just means that they too had the same dream of flying that everybody else did. There are plenty of other works of literature from all over the world that talks about invisibility cloaks, rings of invisibility, and many other things. Heck, even Harry Potter books have an invisibility cloak as a major plot device - that doesn't mean that JK Rowling has an iota of knowledge about any science that can actually make invisible cloaks. So you see, just dreaming up something doesn't need any knowledge of making the dream come true.
Unless you can show me any useful information or theory of making invisible objects, don't expect me or any sensible person to believe such claims.
Also, if a lot of knowledge existed in some undefined past, it wouldn't simply evaporate away. Everybody likes to believe that his or her country/people had a golden age in the past, to which today's advanced civilizations will only come slowly in future.
I'm not sure what your point here is. In your previous post you said magnetic fields can cause gravitational lensing, which is just plain wrong. That's not putting it in simple words - that's making a wrong statement. Anyway, as I said before, gravitational lensing has nothing whatsoever to do with this thread, or invisible objects.well we are diverting from mythology to proofs and as I said description of what gravitational lensing is or event horizon. I am not interested in that. 1936 is recent not even 100 years from now. I am aware of gravitational lensing is not due to magnetic field. But unlike you are a nobel laureate, people need to know in simple words. The earth is not massive neither the size of a body which cause gravitational lensing.
The day you make a repeatable scientific discovery using knowledge contained in the vedas, alert me. Until now what has been happening is that scientists discover something through science, and then religious people claim it was secretly hidden away in their favorite book all along. Just why they didn't bring it out before scientists did, they will not explain. So if you can discover from the vedas something valuable about quantum mechanics or relativity or aeronautics that scientists don't know, by all means, do bring it out. As you are aware, the vedas are freely available online.If man made technology cannot create what nature created then let's find in Vedas. How much we have looked into vedas is not sufficient. Or become spiritual, finally we are in the hierarchy lineage of the creator. We contain his properties.
He saw the dream after years of researching Benzene and othearomatic compounds. Otherwise he wouldn't have had such a dream. Besides, that dream was just a visualization - the mathematiccs of hybridisation of bonds was available outside the dream world. There is a reason that dream happened to a scientist who thought about it all day long for several years, and not to any sage or monk.May be Rollings should become a scientist, finally structure of benzene was solved in dream state only, when he saw snakes making a hexagon, biting each other's tail
No. It's explanation. At this stage I don't even know to what I should ask for proof. What I am looking for is any ancient scripture that has explanations about making invisible material. Not just saying there is an invisibility cloak or a pushpak vimaan, but explaining how it is made. Instead of going on asserting that your ancient books contain such knowledge, tell us which book, which chapter, which stanza/para. Let us also see it.Your basic argument is proof.
We have shifted from sanskrit to english mode due to slavery and we are ashamed of that , to go through those texts you need to learn sanskrit and many liberals call it communal. It is our fault that we are not able to maintain that knowledge or it was not passed.
The use of zero has been there before aryabhatta. Aryabhatta just showed the world how it is utilized, otherwise we had been still finding the ways to build 1 byte RAM system.
The use of 10^22 year existed in and use of micro second. Gives us an idea that they have encountered so massive things that these numbered came into existence and proper use of calculation.
Unit of time based on Hindu units of time
Time - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There are many more texts which haven't been studied well, Upanishads, Vedas, puranas
You need powerful magnets enough to bend a photon. They have done it Switzerland. So it is possible. Anyways!I'm not sure what your point here is. In your previous post you said magnetic fields can cause gravitational lensing, which is just plain wrong. That's not putting it in simple words - that's making a wrong statement. Anyway, as I said before, gravitational lensing has nothing whatsoever to do with this thread, or invisible objects.
The day you make a repeatable scientific discovery using knowledge contained in the vedas, alert me. Until now what has been happening is that scientists discover something through science, and then religious people claim it was secretly hidden away in their favorite book all along. Just why they didn't bring it out before scientists did, they will not explain. So if you can discover from the vedas something valuable about quantum mechanics or relativity or aeronautics that scientists don't know, by all means, do bring it out. As you are aware, the vedas are freely available online.
He saw the dream after years of researching Benzene and othearomatic compounds. Otherwise he wouldn't have had such a dream. Besides, that dream was just a visualization - the mathematiccs of hybridisation of bonds was available outside the dream world. There is a reason that dream happened to a scientist who thought about it all day long for several years, and not to any sage or monk.
No. It's explanation. At this stage I don't even know to what I should ask for proof. What I am looking for is any ancient scripture that has explanations about making invisible material. Not just saying there is an invisibility cloak or a pushpak vimaan, but explaining how it is made. Instead of going on asserting that your ancient books contain such knowledge, tell us which book, which chapter, which stanza/para. Let us also see it.
I have a good knowledge of numbers and english letter. But I will still fail to decode a Paragraph of random numbers and letters with some message.I assure you, my knowledge of Sanskrit is excellent. Of course you don't have to believe me when I say that. But as I said before, if you have any Sanskrit text explaining the know-how for making invisible planes, do point it out. Whether I can read it or not can be argued after you show it.
Nobody is saying that Indians in premodern times never invented anything. Of course a lot of work in the sceinces and mathematics was done in India. Heck, calculus was first used in central Kerala, and wasn't invented by Newton and Leibnitz. (They did independently invent it, a couple of centuries later.)
We are only questioning idiotic claims like ancient India having invisible planes and so on. We are not saying that India hasn't produced anything.
No. You don't need to have come across something weighing 10^1000 kg, to be able to talk about 10^1000 kg. Numerals are infinite, and we can imagine as large numbers as we want. I can talk about (10^1000)^1000, and also give a name for it. Anybody can.
So? Again - nobody is asking you to show something or other that Indians knew in ancient times. We are asking you to demonstrate the ludicrous claims being made regarding invisible planes and a few similar claims being made recently.
If they haven't been studied well, then study them well before making such claims. You claim that ancient texts contain knowledge about invisible planes. We ask you to show us such texts. You come back at us with "we haven't studied them enough"? Dude!