Windjammer
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2009
- Messages
- 41,319
- Reaction score
- 181
- Country
- Location
Dude I have seen this and more, please delete the video as it's very painful for friends and family to see all this.
@Maarkhoor
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude I have seen this and more, please delete the video as it's very painful for friends and family to see all this.
Aermacchi or T-50s would be great. JF-17B is the most obvious choice. However, when Vipers were crashing at a high rate in the 90s they were being called junk as well. Believe it or not F-7 is the most stable jet in the inventory, however it can become unforgiving if not carefully aware. We still don't know if it was a technical malfunction or pilot error.Time to let these old fellas to go replace them with JF17 B or Armanchi
Aermacchi or T-50s would be great. JF-17B is the most obvious choice. However, when Vipers were crashing at a high rate in the 90s they were being called junk as well. Believe it or not F-7 is the most stable jet in the inventory, however it can become unforgiving if not carefully aware. We still don't know if it was a technical malfunction or pilot error.
Yep. The CAS said JF-17B is for JF-17 OCU, but there needs to be a LIFT to serve as a bridge between the K-8 (FCU) and JF-17 (OCU). Basically, the LIFT will takeover the intermediary step the FT-7P/PG are handling today.Need dedicated platform for LIFT, not these F-7/FT-7P's.
Imagine a soon-to-be fighter pilot crashing a JF-17B Block 2 which has undergone an expensive MLU incl. AESA rdr in future. Who will be pissed off?
Is that the reason PAF says JF-17B is no LIFT and sends RFI's to Leonardo, Hongdu, etc?
What about TAI Hurjet???Need dedicated platform for LIFT, not these F-7/FT-7P's.
Imagine a soon-to-be fighter pilot crashing a JF-17B Block 2 which has undergone an expensive MLU incl. AESA rdr in future. Who will be pissed off?
Is that the reason PAF says JF-17B is no LIFT and sends RFI's to Leonardo, Hongdu, etc?
A few used Hawks will do the trick. It will close the gap between K-8s and fighters. I'm not talking about the 100 series. But the 50s and 60s ones. Very reliable and an excellent trainer.Need dedicated platform for LIFT, not these F-7/FT-7P's.
Imagine a soon-to-be fighter pilot crashing a JF-17B Block 2 which has undergone an expensive MLU incl. AESA rdr in future. Who will be pissed off?
Is that the reason PAF says JF-17B is no LIFT and sends RFI's to Leonardo, Hongdu, etc?
What options do we have ?Yep. The CAS said JF-17B is for JF-17 OCU, but there needs to be a LIFT to serve as a bridge between the K-8 (FCU) and JF-17 (OCU). Basically, the LIFT will takeover the intermediary step the FT-7P/PG are handling today.
What about TAI Hurjet???
@Bilal Khan (Quwa)
The last time the CAS spoke the main options were M346, L-15 and T-50. They can look at the Hurjet, but that's a few years out, and it seems the LIFT program is more urgent.What options do we have ?
L-5 ? Having 24 is enough right?
Hawk is plausible, especially with the relative thaw in UK-Pakistan defence ties. If anything, it seems more PAF pilots can vouch for the Hawk than most other platforms.A few used Hawks will do the trick. It will close the gap between K-8s and fighters. I'm not talking about the 100 series. But the 50s and 60s ones. Very reliable and an excellent trainer.
So are we like really serious to acquire a LIFT now ? When can we expect to hear about deals ?The last time the CAS spoke the main options were M346, L-15 and T-50. They can look at the Hurjet, but that's a few years out, and it seems the LIFT program is more urgent.
Hawk is plausible, especially with the relative thaw in UK-Pakistan defence ties. If anything, it seems more PAF pilots can vouch for the Hawk than most other platforms.
The CAS said the aim is getting a LIFT before the FGFA.So are we like really serious to acquire a LIFT now ? When can we expect to hear about deals ?
Same thing happened with Mirage. On which uncle Sq ldr, and his trainee. Trainee ejection system failed, my uncle parachute fail to open at 4000 ft.Apparently just found out that although both pilots ejected but sadly their chutes didn't deploy properly.
However, I was right in the fact that last PAF crash occurred on 23 Jan 2019 in Quetta again involved an F-7.
Like they service the aircraft engine, avionics or airframe, I wonder if same is done for ejection seats to see if allthe mechanisms are in working order.Same thing happened with Mirage. On which uncle Sq ldr, and his trainee. Trainee ejection system failed, my uncle parachute fail to open at 4000 ft.
PAF is flying junk.
A few used Hawks will do the trick. It will close the gap between K-8s and fighters. I'm not talking about the 100 series. But the 50s and 60s ones. Very reliable and an excellent trainer.