What's new

Not just for Harry Potter: New York scientists unveil ‘invisibility cloak’

Skull and Bones

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jan 29, 2011
Messages
18,598
Reaction score
-4
Country
India
Location
United States
University of Rochester researchers discover way to hide objects from sight using inexpensive and readily available lenses.

Scientists at the University of Rochester have discovered a way to hide large objects from sight, also known as cloaking, using inexpensive and readily available lenses.

Cloaking is the process by which an object becomes hidden from view, while everything else around the cloaked object appears undisturbed.

“A lot of people have worked on a lot of different aspects of optical cloaking for years,” John Howell, a professor of physics at the upstate New York school, said on Friday.

The so-called Rochester Cloak is not really a tangible cloak at all. Rather the device looks like equipment used by an optometrist. When an object is placed behind the layered lenses it seems to disappear.

Previous cloaking methods have been complicated, expensive, and not able to hide objects in three dimensions when viewed at varying angles, they say.

“From what we know this is the first cloaking device that provides three-dimensional, continuously multidirectional cloaking,” said Joseph Choi, a graduate student who helped develop the method at Rochester, which is renowned for its optical research.

In their tests, the researchers have cloaked a hand, a face, and a ruler – making each object appear “invisible” while the image behind the hidden object remains in view. The implications for the discovery are endless, they say.

“I imagine this could be used to cloak a trailer on the back of a semi-truck so the driver can see directly behind him,” Choi said. “It can be used for surgery, in the military, in interior design, art.”

Howell said the Rochester Cloak, like the fictitious cloak described in the pages of the Harry Potter series, causes no distortion of the background object.

Building the device does not break the bank either. It cost Howell and Choi a little over $1,000 in materials to create it and they believe it can be done even cheaper.

Although a patent is pending, they have released simple instructions on how to create a Rochester Cloak at home for under $100 – as well as a video about the project on YouTube.

Not just for Harry Potter: New York scientists unveil ‘invisibility cloak’ | Science | theguardian.com
 
If you find the lenses, you know where it is.
 
seems simple to construct... this seems on similar principle to the "camera tricks" used in older films ( before cgi )... and of course, this new cloaking technique seems simple after someone has demonstrated it :-)

by the way, this is the first time i have thanked some post that wolfschanzze has also thanked :D

If you find the lenses, you know where it is.

how will you find the lenses?? radar?? or visual observation??
 
@Peter C, the original post already has link to the video you posted :-)
 

though i thanked you already, just wanted to say, don't miss the magic illusions by darcy oake that you can see in the "related videos" sidebar in the youtube vids on this thread... i have seen mr. oake's performances on "britain's got talent - 2014"... marvellous... and on the same show, watch the lovely english lady violinist, lettice rowbotham, and the superb martial artist... actually, he calls himself a "mentalist"... aaron crow... believe me, you will thank me back.
 
though i thanked you already, just wanted to say, don't miss the magic illusions by darcy oake that you can see in the "related videos" sidebar in the youtube vids on this thread... i have seen mr. oake's performances on "britain's got talent - 2014"... marvellous... and on the same show, watch the lovely english lady violinist, lettice rowbotham, and the superb martial artist... actually, he calls himself a "mentalist"... aaron crow... believe me, you will thank me back.

If you look at 3:11 in (
) you can see the woman has plenty of room
 
University of Rochester researchers discover way to hide objects from sight using inexpensive and readily available lenses.

Scientists at the University of Rochester have discovered a way to hide large objects from sight, also known as cloaking, using inexpensive and readily available lenses.

Cloaking is the process by which an object becomes hidden from view, while everything else around the cloaked object appears undisturbed.

“A lot of people have worked on a lot of different aspects of optical cloaking for years,” John Howell, a professor of physics at the upstate New York school, said on Friday.

The so-called Rochester Cloak is not really a tangible cloak at all. Rather the device looks like equipment used by an optometrist. When an object is placed behind the layered lenses it seems to disappear.

Previous cloaking methods have been complicated, expensive, and not able to hide objects in three dimensions when viewed at varying angles, they say.

“From what we know this is the first cloaking device that provides three-dimensional, continuously multidirectional cloaking,” said Joseph Choi, a graduate student who helped develop the method at Rochester, which is renowned for its optical research.

In their tests, the researchers have cloaked a hand, a face, and a ruler – making each object appear “invisible” while the image behind the hidden object remains in view. The implications for the discovery are endless, they say.

“I imagine this could be used to cloak a trailer on the back of a semi-truck so the driver can see directly behind him,” Choi said. “It can be used for surgery, in the military, in interior design, art.”

Howell said the Rochester Cloak, like the fictitious cloak described in the pages of the Harry Potter series, causes no distortion of the background object.

Building the device does not break the bank either. It cost Howell and Choi a little over $1,000 in materials to create it and they believe it can be done even cheaper.

Although a patent is pending, they have released simple instructions on how to create a Rochester Cloak at home for under $100 – as well as a video about the project on YouTube.

Not just for Harry Potter: New York scientists unveil ‘invisibility cloak’ | Science | theguardian.com
@Syed.Ali.Haider do you know any of these guys??
my city in the news finally…
 
If you look at 3:11 in ( ) you can see the woman has plenty of room

well, she does have to be that flexible, and of that small size, and above all, the presentation has to be "the continuous unexpected" and the magician has to be an artist... at the same 3:11, even the two presenters in the side-wing were not expecting that... i think, that is why in the last few years, magic shows have come back, despite computer graphics in films...:-)

one thing though... the female popping out of the box... i suppose, in the old times, it would have been a boy instead of her... but nowadays, a 45-kg female is presented as the "norm" and "to be" and "cool" by the "health industry", fashion industry and film industry.

i can't imagine nigella lawson at her chubbiest best or kate winslet at her first oscar ceremony... ever become able to pop out of the box like that... and nor would i want them to... :D
 
Back
Top Bottom