Pfpilot
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2010
- Messages
- 522
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
It is of upmost importance to identify the nation that is responsible for the escalation of the conflict. Because the blame must fall solely on said nation for raising the stakes. The North Koreans take the cake for this situation. Geopolitics is all about balance. When a nation tries to tilt it one way or the other, there is a ripple affect that effects many nations. Naturally then, when the North Koreans act aggressively, the USA and South Korea have to reply in kind. Partly due to the need to maintain a military balance, but also to sustain the diplomatic positions they occupy. America, thanks to it's position in the global hierarchy cannot back down if it is to maintain its clout in other regional theaters.
It is also important to understand the reactionary role of the US in this conflict. Were the North Koreans not constantly threatening war with increasingly viable destructive forces, the Americans would have no reason to get embroiled in another conflict. The US maintains a certain sphere of influence in the Far East. If threatened by North Korea or China for that matter, it will react swiftly to neutralize the threat. It then behoves the threatening nation to be prepared to back up the talk. Interestingly, like Iran, North Korea has no chance of even denting the American military machine. But by shoving the relatively small size and weak economy of the nation to the forefront, North Korea masquerades around as the victim, while simultaneously holding a gun to the head of the wider region.
In the end, if a nation is incapable of standing up to US power, it must back off. It cannot be the responsibility of the US to play the integrity angle. If it affects America, they will react. Just because they are stronger doesn't mean they should be willing to take a punch without reaction. This applies to all nations on a smaller scale. But moral criticism is directed only towards America.
It is also important to understand the reactionary role of the US in this conflict. Were the North Koreans not constantly threatening war with increasingly viable destructive forces, the Americans would have no reason to get embroiled in another conflict. The US maintains a certain sphere of influence in the Far East. If threatened by North Korea or China for that matter, it will react swiftly to neutralize the threat. It then behoves the threatening nation to be prepared to back up the talk. Interestingly, like Iran, North Korea has no chance of even denting the American military machine. But by shoving the relatively small size and weak economy of the nation to the forefront, North Korea masquerades around as the victim, while simultaneously holding a gun to the head of the wider region.
In the end, if a nation is incapable of standing up to US power, it must back off. It cannot be the responsibility of the US to play the integrity angle. If it affects America, they will react. Just because they are stronger doesn't mean they should be willing to take a punch without reaction. This applies to all nations on a smaller scale. But moral criticism is directed only towards America.