What's new

Noam Chomsky: My Reaction to Osama bin Laden’s Death

53fd

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
It’s increasingly clear that the operation was a planned assassination, multiply violating elementary norms of international law. There appears to have been no attempt to apprehend the unarmed victim, as presumably could have been done by 80 commandos facing virtually no opposition—except, they claim, from his wife, who lunged towards them. In societies that profess some respect for law, suspects are apprehended and brought to fair trial. I stress “suspects.” In April 2002, the head of the FBI, Robert Mueller, informed the press that after the most intensive investigation in history, the FBI could say no more than that it “believed” that the plot was hatched in Afghanistan, though implemented in the UAE and Germany. What they only believed in April 2002, they obviously didn’t know 8 months earlier, when Washington dismissed tentative offers by the Taliban (how serious, we do not know, because they were instantly dismissed) to extradite bin Laden if they were presented with evidence—which, as we soon learned, Washington didn’t have. Thus Obama was simply lying when he said, in his White House statement, that “we quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by al Qaeda.”

Nothing serious has been provided since. There is much talk of bin Laden’s “confession,” but that is rather like my confession that I won the Boston Marathon. He boasted of what he regarded as a great achievement.

There is also much media discussion of Washington’s anger that Pakistan didn’t turn over bin Laden, though surely elements of the military and security forces were aware of his presence in Abbottabad. Less is said about Pakistani anger that the U.S. invaded their territory to carry out a political assassination. Anti-American fervor is already very high in Pakistan, and these events are likely to exacerbate it. The decision to dump the body at sea is already, predictably, provoking both anger and skepticism in much of the Muslim world.

We might ask ourselves how we would be reacting if Iraqi commandos landed at George W. Bush’s compound, assassinated him, and dumped his body in the Atlantic. Uncontroversially, his crimes vastly exceed bin Laden’s, and he is not a “suspect” but uncontroversially the “decider” who gave the orders to commit the “supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole” (quoting the Nuremberg Tribunal) for which Nazi criminals were hanged: the hundreds of thousands of deaths, millions of refugees, destruction of much of the country, the bitter sectarian conflict that has now spread to the rest of the region.

There’s more to say about [Cuban airline bomber Orlando] Bosch, who just died peacefully in Florida, including reference to the “Bush doctrine” that societies that harbor terrorists are as guilty as the terrorists themselves and should be treated accordingly. No one seemed to notice that Bush was calling for invasion and destruction of the U.S. and murder of its criminal president.

Same with the name, Operation Geronimo. The imperial mentality is so profound, throughout western society, that no one can perceive that they are glorifying bin Laden by identifying him with courageous resistance against genocidal invaders. It’s like naming our murder weapons after victims of our crimes: Apache, Tomahawk… It’s as if the Luftwaffe were to call its fighter planes “Jew” and “Gypsy.”

There is much more to say, but even the most obvious and elementary facts should provide us with a good deal to think about.

Guernica / Noam Chomsky: My Reaction to Osama bin Laden’s Death
 
. .
I would also have liked to see OBL brought to the international criminal court, to receive a fair and open trial outside of US interference. That's called justice. What the US did is assassination. From Guantanamo to Hit Squads in Afghanistan, US "moral superiority" is slipping lower and lower.
 
.
I would also have liked to see OSB brought to the international criminal court, to receive a fair and open trial outside of US interference. That's called justice. What the US did is assassination. From Guantanamo to Hit Squads in Afghanistan, US "moral superiority" is slipping lower and lower.
Ridiculous. Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda attacked US several times, in and out of the US. If international consensus is that important to you, then China should allow the Tibet or the Falun Gong issues be settled the same way you speak of here.
 
.
Touched a nerve there? You know as well as I do Americans don't care about justice. The american discussion on the assassination was all about showing off America's power, to show other countries not to mess with the US of A, to reclaim the imperial glory tarnished by the order of one man in Afghanstian. Gloat away over your gratuitous show of American power to destory and murder.
 
.
You think there would be no consquence to the hundred thousand Iraqi children starved and killed by lack of medical supplies during the American engineered sanctions? 9/11 is the consequence. Osama is the instrument of reprisal. If you want peace and safety, keep your trigger-happy troops on a tighter leash.
 
.
Similar to the US, has passed a bill if anything happens on its soil indicating there terrorists were in that country, US will attack.

The same bill has to be passed by Pakistan an assimilation to convey message that Pakistan will also Operate and take action out of Pakistan if traces of funds and who are behind all this drama are found, But alas our Poor Govt has no balls and certainly no brains to declare Pakistan a sovereign country.

Thus similar bills and making them laws if are passed in Pakistan can to a certain degree give US a message no free sovereign nation's law can't be violated.
 
.
Touched a nerve there? You know as well as I do Americans don't care about justice. The american discussion on the assassination was all about showing off America's power, to show other countries not to mess with the US of A, to reclaim the imperial glory tarnished by the order of one man in Afghanstian. Gloat away over your gratuitous show of American power to destory and murder.


You underestimate the lengths we were prepared to go to to see Osama dead by our hands. We sent in a covert SEAL team to kill and bring the man back and confirm his death visually. If Pakistan had tried to interfere i'm utterly confident we would have pushed the stakes by securing the skies around that area (IE shoot down all hostile pak planes), in fact there were hornets scrambled on the border waiting just in case.


In this case justice is Osama's death. Make no mistake this was a kill op, and I wouldn't have it any other way. You can fantasize that this was about showing off our country's power, but this wasn't so political. This was revenge, pure and simple. The man was a dead man walking for 10 years. Now he's just dead.

As for international court, BS! I don't want any of our money to be spent on trying a dead man walking (we're the largest donor to the UN). A double-tap saved us all the trouble of a circus.

No need to try a man who has crowed of his actions.

By the way Noam Chomsky is an utter tool. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, don't confuse the two.

:edit: The one to blame for the sanctions toll is Saddam, who presided and readily accepted the deaths of his own people, much like the one to blame for NK's poverty is Kim Jong Il who will gladly accept the starvation of his own people for a nuclear weapons program. Saddam is dead now, one can only hope the same for Kim.
 
.
Noam Chomsky: My Reaction to Osama bin Laden’s Death

We might ask ourselves how we would be reacting if Iraqi commandos landed at George W. Bush’s compound, assassinated him, and dumped his body in the Atlantic.
By Noam Chomsky

It’s increasingly clear that the operation was a planned assassination, multiply violating elementary norms of international law. There appears to have been no attempt to apprehend the unarmed victim, as presumably could have been done by 80 commandos facing virtually no opposition—except, they claim, from his wife, who lunged towards them. In societies that profess some respect for law, suspects are apprehended and brought to fair trial. I stress “suspects.” In April 2002, the head of the FBI, Robert Mueller, informed the press that after the most intensive investigation in history, the FBI could say no more than that it “believed” that the plot was hatched in Afghanistan, though implemented in the UAE and Germany. What they only believed in April 2002, they obviously didn’t know 8 months earlier, when Washington dismissed tentative offers by the Taliban (how serious, we do not know, because they were instantly dismissed) to extradite bin Laden if they were presented with evidence—which, as we soon learned, Washington didn’t have. Thus Obama was simply lying when he said, in his White House statement, that “we quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by al Qaeda.”

Nothing serious has been provided since. There is much talk of bin Laden’s “confession,” but that is rather like my confession that I won the Boston Marathon. He boasted of what he regarded as a great achievement.

There is also much media discussion of Washington’s anger that Pakistan didn’t turn over bin Laden, though surely elements of the military and security forces were aware of his presence in Abbottabad. Less is said about Pakistani anger that the U.S. invaded their territory to carry out a political assassination. Anti-American fervor is already very high in Pakistan, and these events are likely to exacerbate it. The decision to dump the body at sea is already, predictably, provoking both anger and skepticism in much of the Muslim world.

It’s like naming our murder weapons after victims of our crimes: Apache, Tomahawk… It’s as if the Luftwaffe were to call its fighter planes “Jew” and “Gypsy.”

We might ask ourselves how we would be reacting if Iraqi commandos landed at George W. Bush’s compound, assassinated him, and dumped his body in the Atlantic. Uncontroversially, his crimes vastly exceed bin Laden’s, and he is not a “suspect” but uncontroversially the “decider” who gave the orders to commit the “supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole” (quoting the Nuremberg Tribunal) for which Nazi criminals were hanged: the hundreds of thousands of deaths, millions of refugees, destruction of much of the country, the bitter sectarian conflict that has now spread to the rest of the region.

There’s more to say about [Cuban airline bomber Orlando] Bosch, who just died peacefully in Florida, including reference to the “Bush doctrine” that societies that harbor terrorists are as guilty as the terrorists themselves and should be treated accordingly. No one seemed to notice that Bush was calling for invasion and destruction of the U.S. and murder of its criminal president.

Same with the name, Operation Geronimo. The imperial mentality is so profound, throughout western society, that no one can perceive that they are glorifying bin Laden by identifying him with courageous resistance against genocidal invaders. It’s like naming our murder weapons after victims of our crimes: Apache, Tomahawk… It’s as if the Luftwaffe were to call its fighter planes “Jew” and “Gypsy.”
There is much more to say, but even the most obvious and elementary facts should provide us with a good deal to think about.

Noam Chomsky is Institute Professor emeritus in the MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy. He is the author of numerous best-selling political works. His latest books are a new edition of Power and Terror, The Essential Chomsky (edited by Anthony Arnove), a collection of his writings on politics and on language from the 1950s to the present, Gaza in Crisis, with Ilan Pappé, and Hopes and Prospects, also available as an audiobook.

Guernica / Noam Chomsky: My Reaction to Osama bin Laden’s Death
 
.
Chomsky is by training a linguist. When I objected to a particularly egregious and damaging usage of words - the same phrase meant the opposite thing in two cultures, but the same op-ed was intended for both - he replied that it was "all part of The Game." "The Game" - stretching words to their limits so their individual use may be technically correct but their application in context adds up to a falsehood - is what he does for kicks.

He snows people because not everyone grasps (as Chomsky does) that different words can describe the same thing but only apply in particular contexts. By using the word inappropriately he compels the unwary reader to change his or her characterization of an act. For example, he refers to the 1944 Normandy landings as "the U.S. invasion of France". This is technically true, but contextually and emotionally false: France had already been invaded by the Nazis and was under Nazi occupation; furthermore, the French did not consider it a hostile invasion ("hostile" is usually implied when the word "invasion" is employed, but that's a cultural not linguistic truth, get it?) but instead as liberation.

But if you listen to Chomsky and you didn't truly understand events or context you might be convinced that the U.S. was an aggressor in WWII and the Nazis (and French) mere victims. He's recognized as a dishonest academic; that's why he couldn't get a lecture hall when he visited my campus and had to lecture in the coffee shop instead.
 
.
You underestimate the lengths we were prepared to go to to see Osama dead by our hands. We sent in a covert SEAL team to kill and bring the man back and confirm his death visually. If Pakistan had tried to interfere i'm utterly confident we would have pushed the stakes by securing the skies around that area (IE shoot down all hostile pak planes), in fact there were hornets scrambled on the border waiting just in case.


In this case justice is Osama's death. Make no mistake this was a kill op, and I wouldn't have it any other way. You can fantasize that this was about showing off our country's power, but this wasn't so political. This was revenge, pure and simple. The man was a dead man walking for 10 years. Now he's just dead.

As for international court, BS! I don't want any of our money to be spent on trying a dead man walking (we're the largest donor to the UN). A double-tap saved us all the trouble of a circus.

No need to try a man who has crowed of his actions.

I can sympathize. Thanks for writing such a clear and honest take on the killing of osama bin laden. Your account makes more sense than the analyses I've read by foreign countries that it's an exercise meant to flex American muscle.
 
.
Chomsky is an academic nut case who does not like the fact that he is an ethnic Jew and speaks as if he were a Gentile. Disgustisng piece of human trash, it is amazing that academia has tolerated him.
 
.
How dare you criticize him. If you had no guilty and nothing to hide, you will not waste your time to criticize what should be self evidently "false" if it is indeed false.

Now I believe everything he says must be true, otherwise Americans would not jump out to deny it so eagerly.

When will Americans get the balls to criticize their government? All I see on this forum are singleminded sheep thinking and blind support for the US government. Any American who hates the crimes of the Wall Street regime is immediately labeled a "self hating Jew" and "nutcase"! Dictatorship can do wonders!
 
.
Now I believe everything he says must be true, otherwise Americans would not jump out to deny it so eagerly.
"Everything"? Can't you be specific?

I wonder if you'll also believe the barely-concealed contempt he has for people like you who fall for his tricks. Neutralize the words with extreme emotional or implied connotations and fact-check his statements and you'll find you have very little or nothing left - save, perhaps, anger at having been tricked in the first place.
 
.
Touched a nerve there? You know as well as I do Americans don't care about justice. The american discussion on the assassination was all about showing off America's power, to show other countries not to mess with the US of A, to reclaim the imperial glory tarnished by the order of one man in Afghanstian. Gloat away over your gratuitous show of American power to destory and murder.
Looks like it is YOUR nerve that is being rubbed raw for opening your mouth without thinking. Spare US all your pretentious and convenient reverence for international consensus. You want to try bin Laden in international court? Fine. Then let that same international community investigate Tiananmen Square. Let that international community, which include US and Taiwan, debate and vote on Taiwan's independence.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom