What's new

No Talks On Kashmir At UN Security Council As China Withdraws Request

Status
Not open for further replies.
We produce some of best quality fruits and crops, we have fertile land, we can feed ourselves. Yes we will nuclear blackmail because if the world treats us unfairly we will turn it into a nuclear wasteland. What we demand is a fair dialogue and mediation and right of ppl of kashmir, if the world doesnt even want to talk and calls it bilateral, then we have right to finish it bilaterally with nukes.

Delusional. Nukes doesn't kill the world. You overestimate the yield out of your nuclear bombs. Still, there is no point talking to madman like yourself. Please, go have a mental check up once.
 
.
China is simply flirting with the situation.China knows that its resolution will be stopped.It is just like saying to Pakistan” We care about you”.
Agreed
But remember china has unofficially lost its face by doing so. You can't keep.on doing like this

1. China never maintained neutrality on Kashmir issue.

2. They openly called out India and stood up for their claim of Ladakh.

I know kai tumharai dimaag mein gobar barha hua hai, likin thora samajh ni koshish karo tou shayed samajh aija. Your points are not valid.



In the end, its a war of words and has zero impact on ground.
Your point 1 and 2 care self contradictory
They saw them as a non party to Kashmir dispute
They have claims to ladakh etc

If you have any other statements please go ahead and post....

I am here to clear the gobar from some people's head. Have to go through people like you

Voctional hazard
 
.
Pakistanis should know one thing. The west and India wanted to break the alliance between China and Pakistan so they launched propaganda about Xinjiang which uneducated and gullible Pakistanis fell for without thoroughly analyzing. We ourself axed our foot by poking our dirty noses into china's internal affairs plus the trafficking of Pakistani greedy women's was showcased as if China govt has a hand in it. It's there any country as dumb as ourselves?
 
. .
.
How do you know it was postponed. Just face saving title. When the article itself clearly says any country could just disagree with a proposal and not have it at the table. Did France in its disagreement, agree to a different date? Lol.

What are you on about? I am refuting the BS from Indian media. It was clearly France, not China, which used it veto power like it did the last time.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom