‘No talks if Pakistan insists Kashmir is a territorial dispute’

[SMC]

90% huh? Maps besides Pakistani and Indian ones show Kashmir as disputed territory. Dont make up false numbers.

 

[Omar1984]

Here's a map of South Asia from the UN website. Clearly Kashmir is not part of India.

http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/map/profile/seasia.pdf


In the UN website, they even have a different section of map for Jammu and Kashmir.

http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/map/profile/kashmir.pdf

If Jammu and Kashmir was an integral part of India there wouldn't be a different section for it in the UN website. I dont see a different section for Rajasthan.

 

[Kaali]

If people want to not live in peace, what can one do. You wanna live with a dispute forever, so be it. RAW terrorism will not last forever. You know the law of averages. RAW has exported terrorism exponentially to ISI. Favour will be return sooner or later.

Well you have been already doing it as admitted by your government. But now when the same is happening to you why are you on fire. We have been saying it along since long. we gave you even proofs but if you want answer in your language, be it. You need to realize the size and resources of India before any adventures.

And Kashmir being the disputed territory gives you the right for terrorism within India then India also holds the right to slap back on your face in the same tone.

 

[ejaz007]

Well you have been already doing it as admitted by your government. But now when the same is happening to you why are you on fire. We have been saying it along since long. we gave you even proofs but if you want answer in your language, be it. You need to realize the size and resources of India before any adventures.

And Kashmir being the disputed territory gives you the right for terrorism within India then India also holds the right to slap back on your face in the same tone.

You are doing the same thing in Balochistan and FATA. No one is completely innocent. Every one has some secrets to hide.

 

[third eye]

The bottom line is that we ALL bleed when cut.

...and we all can inflict ' cuts' on each other. Terrorists are like knives who can only cut - it does not matter who.

Someday we shall all sheath our ' knives'.

 

[PostColonial]

You are doing the same thing in Balochistan and FATA. No one is completely innocent. Every one has some secrets to hide.

The faster you stop believing your government's lies the better.

 

[Comet]

Ok let me be straight and bit blunt for you


We consider Kashmir as the integral part of India. And we wont discuss with you. What can you do about it?

Shout .......... Oh do you think anyone cares about it when no one has nothing to gain from you but yes we do we have our diplomatic cards in place.

Who on Earth cares what YOU think or consider. It is about Kashmir and let Kashmiris decide what they want.

P.S: UN also seems to think contrary to what YOU CONSIDER.

 

[Comet]

Well you have been already doing it as admitted by your government. But now when the same is happening to you why are you on fire. We have been saying it along since long. we gave you even proofs but if you want answer in your language, be it. You need to realize the size and resources of India before any adventures.

So, you indirectly agreeing that India IS INVOLVED in Pakistan. Thanks!

 

[Spring Onion]

bwahhhhahahahah all the tension is on Kashmir. If we accept Indian occupation of Kashmir then what the fuss all about talks then.

who needs any talk with India then.

Idiots

 

[Awesome]

by sidelining the question you are saying its not disputed for pakistan(or limited in the dispute).

The only possibility being if the people of Kashmir vote and claim Azad Kashmir as a part of India. But we all know they are not going to vote for you guys

 

[Awesome]

Logic dictates that either there would be a solution on Kashmir that would entail giving the Kashmiris a right for self-determination... Or we will fight.

End of talks. This, that, bla blu, is just nonsense. If you want to fight, then you'll say no to talks. If you want it resolved, you'd say yes and allow the Kashmiris to choose.

End of story.

 

[Absar]

Kashmiris should be given the right of self-determination.

A lot of Indian fellows compare Kashmir with the Nagaland, Asaam etc. States. I can't understand this analogy of comparing Kashmir with other states just because of them having one thing common -- a freedom movement. If anything, Kashmir is a different case since the demarcation of boundaries and later Independence of Pakistan and India from Brits.

Jawahar Laal Nehru, as few fellow Indian members say, was an idiot who Promised Kashmiris that the right of self-determination would be given to them. Sonia Gandhi belongs to the same political arena-- same political bloodline, I ask?

 

[PlanetWarrior]

Kashmiris should be given the right of self-determination.

A lot of Indian fellows compare Kashmir with the Nagaland, Asaam etc. States. I can't understand this analogy of comparing Kashmir with other states just because of them having one thing common -- a freedom movement. If anything, Kashmir is a different case since the demarcation of boundaries and later Independence of Pakistan and India from Brits.

Jawahar Laal Nehru, as few fellow Indian members say, was an idiot who Promised Kashmiris that the right of self-determination would be given to them. Sonia Gandhi belongs to the same political arena-- same political bloodline, I ask?

During Nehru India did not have such a large army. Now Indian army will have no place to go to if we let go of Kashmir hello
Alternatively think about it. If Kashmir passes by then India's defence budget will be reduced. Who is going to pay the Indian politicians all those bribes for arms tenders etc

Now on a more serious note, ideally the issue should be resolved by both Pakistan and India withdrawing their troops and nationals from Kashmir and letting the people of Kashmir decide on their fate. Problem is some 60 years later, how do you decide who the "people of Kashmir" are. Obviously there has been mass resettlements from both India and Pakistan of their nationalities. An issue which could have been resolved some 60 years ago still haunts the 2 nations. An obsession to Pakistan and a matter of stubborn rhetoric to India. If only that king of Kashmir elected to remain independent

 

[PlanetWarrior]

So, you indirectly agreeing that India IS INVOLVED in Pakistan. Thanks!

Yup Kaali is a senior member of the RAW Agency. She is disguised as a man with a beard and a turban and is fighting the PDF. When she is offduty as a RAW agent she acts as prime minister of India. What are you smirking about Kaali's "admissions" for? Go and read the official Indian government stance on terrorism in Pakistan. It says you started it by breeding the terrorists. Now that they are biting your rear , don't come looking at us as a cause

 

[Comet]

Yup Kaali is a senior member of the RAW Agency. She is disguised as a man with a beard and a turban and is fighting the PDF. When she is offduty as a RAW agent she acts as prime minister of India. What are you smirking about Kaali's "admissions" for? Go and read the official Indian government stance on terrorism in Pakistan. It says you started it by breeding the terrorists. Now that they are biting your rear , don't come looking at us as a cause

Dil pe mat le yarr!
If you are to talk about the stance of our respective governments than GoP says that India is involved. So, there is really no need to discuss the stances of our governments.