No Neighbor Comes To Honor Lance Naik Ahmad Wani's Family on Winning Ashoka Chakra

[Tom M]

Man a Kashmiri Muslim fighting against Pakistan sponsored terrorism in Kashmir
got the height bravery award of peace time is enough to cause the burn .... enjoy the a$$e$ on fire

We should involve more Kashmiri youth. If possible we should expand the battalion size of the JAK LI and the state police as well. Give more incentives for the people who are loyal towards the country. That way slowly peace can be restored.

 

[vijayjha]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_47

Here is the article link for you.
Below is the text copied from the article if the website is blocked in ur country or u don't want to click

the Resolution recommended a three-step process for the resolution of the dispute. In the first step, Pakistan was asked to withdraw all its nationals from Kashmir. In the second step, India was asked to progressively reduce its forces to the minimum level required for law and order. In the third step, India was asked to appoint a plebiscite administrator nominated by the United Nations who would conduct a free and impartial plebiscite.

Now u ll say that text doesn't mean what is written. It just mean that kashmir banega pakistan.

Who is ur ideal person by the way in pakistan?
I guess it must be Agha Waqar the gr8 water car engineer.
Cause only his follower will deny the fact the way u denied .

 

[Areesh]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_47

Here is the article link for you.
Below is the text copied from the article if the website is blocked in ur country or u don't want to click

the Resolution recommended a three-step process for the resolution of the dispute. In the first step, Pakistan was asked to withdraw all its nationals from Kashmir. In the second step, India was asked to progressively reduce its forces to the minimum level required for law and order. In the third step, India was asked to appoint a plebiscite administrator nominated by the United Nations who would conduct a free and impartial plebiscite.

I have read all that. You aren't posting anything new

There are threads on this forum where Indian lies related to un resolution have been refuted with facts. You can check them instead of wasting our time with Wikipedia copy paste

Now u ll say that text doesn't mean what is written. It just mean that kashmir banega pakistan.

Who is ur ideal person by the way in pakistan?
I guess it must be Agha Waqar the gr8 water car engineer.
Cause only his follower will deny the fact the way u denied .

That water engineer is the kind of guy who can easily become guru and godman in today's india

I don't know why you guys act like epitome of intellect even though you are only epitome of buffoonry

 

[vijayjha]

I have read all that. You aren't posting anything new

There are threads on this forum where Indian lies related to un resolution have been refuted with facts. You can check them instead of wasting our time with Wikipedia copy paste



That water engineer is the kind of guy who can easily become guru and godman in today's india

I don't know why you guys act like epitome of intellect even though you are only epitome of buffoonry

True water car engineer follower

 

[Areesh]

True water car engineer follower

Says the guy whose nation has been declared most ignorant in the world

 

[vijayjha]

I have read all that. You aren't posting anything new

There are threads on this forum where Indian lies related to un resolution have been refuted with facts. You can check them instead of wasting our time with Wikipedia copy paste



That water engineer is the kind of guy who can easily become guru and godman in today's india

I don't know why you guys act like epitome of intellect even though you are only epitome of buffoonry

He can but hasn't yet but he did become a hero in pakistan ,endorsed by a q khan. 3 cabinet meeting were held, talat hussain was worried ant his safety

Says the guy whose nation has been declared most ignorant in the world

Do u have proof or did u dream?

 

[Areesh]

He can but hasn't yet but he did become a hero in pakistan ,endorsed by a q khan. 3 cabinet meeting were held, talat hussain was worried ant his safety

And discarded in no time. In India he would have become at least a God man if not member parliament or minister.

Do u have proof or did u dream?

About time you start learning about your own nation instead of obsessing over Pakistan

https://m.huffingtonpost.in/2016/12...ecome-the-most-ignorant-nation-in_a_21628333/

 

[vijayjha]

And discarded in no time. In India he would have become at least a God man if not member parliament or minister.

Yes it's easy to play with relegious sentiments but not easy to play with scientific mind of india.
In pak case it's easy in both scenario.
That's why TLP blocked whole pakistan fir a poor cristian lady n agha waqar bachane national scientist

And discarded in no time. In India he would have become at least a God man if not member parliament or minister.



About time you start learning about your own nation instead of obsessing over Pakistan

https://m.huffingtonpost.in/2016/12...ecome-the-most-ignorant-nation-in_a_21628333/

What this has to do with un article on kashmir?

 

[Crixus]

They have enough reperanstation this mess is just in 5 districts and just think all most all encounters in last 1.5 years were carried out after pin point intelligence guess who is giving this intelligence..... although Kashmiris are good people very very soft spoken ....

We should involve more Kashmiri youth. If possible we should expand the battalion size of the JAK LI and the state police as well. Give more incentives for the people who are loyal towards the country. That way slowly peace can be restored.

 

[Tom M]

They have enough reperanstation this mess is just in 5 districts and just think all most all encounters in last 1.5 years were carried out after pin point intelligence guess who is giving this intelligence..... although Kashmiris are good people very very soft spoken ....

Indeed.

 

[Areesh]

Yes it's easy to play with relegious sentiments but not easy to play with scientific mind of india.
In pak case it's easy in both scenario.
That's why TLP blocked whole pakistan fir a poor cristian lady n agha waqar bachane national scientist

In Pakistan's case it is just fame of few days. In india you can even become PM. That is the difference

What this has to do with un article on kashmir?

This is to prove that stop ranting about water engineer since you are part of the most ignorant nation in the world

 

[M. Sarmad]

Now you will say that she is also lying

Stop spamming every thread with the same stupid video.
Has been discussed and debunked many times:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/chri...-of-trash-ive-seen.444780/page-4#post-8586944

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/chri...-piece-of-trash-ive-seen.444780/#post-8585207

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_47

Here is the article link for you.
Below is the text copied from the article if the website is blocked in ur country or u don't want to click

the Resolution recommended a three-step process for the resolution of the dispute. In the first step, Pakistan was asked to withdraw all its nationals from Kashmir. In the second step, India was asked to progressively reduce its forces to the minimum level required for law and order. In the third step, India was asked to appoint a plebiscite administrator nominated by the United Nations who would conduct a free and impartial plebiscite.

A little Correction:

Step 1. A Truce Agreement is concluded
Step 2. Pakistan begins withdrawing its troops
Step 3. India too begins withdrawing its troops (to a minimum level) while Pakistani troops are being withdrawn
Step 4. Plebiscite by UN

A Truce Agreement was never reached because India rejected all demilitarization plans proposed by the UN. Pakistan accepted all.

As Truce Agreement could not be concluded, the Commission never notified Pakistan to begin withdrawing its forces.

Pakistan had made it clear to the UN that it was ready to withdraw its troops as soon as the Commission notified it,

Pakistan went a step further and told the UN that it was ready to withdraw its troops in favor of UN troops regardless of Indian reaction to such a proposal ...


There's a reason for which the UN appointed official mediator (i.e Sir Owen Dixon) blamed India and not Pakistan for halting the process ...


Pakistan stands ready to conclude a truce agreement with India, even today ...


=======

Some hard facts for you our ignorant Indian friend:

• India, in an attempt to deceive the world, seeks to fasten on Pakistan a responsibility to withdraw troops from Jammu and Kashmir unilaterally and unconditionally, by quoting out of context a certain provision of UN Commission’s resolution of 13 August 1948, that is, Part 11, paragraph A.I.

• While doing so, India deliberately suppresses the other paragraphs of Part II. The Indians are guilty of suppressio veri and suggestio falsi.

• These subsequent paragraphs make it obvious that the obligation of Pakistan to withdraw its troops from the state of Jammu and Kashmir does not devolve until both sides conclude a truce agreement to govern the withdrawal of not only Pakistan forces but also the bulk of the Indian armed forces from the state

• The reciprocal obligations of the two sides as to the modalities of demilitarization, have been persistently sought to be confused by India over the past 70 years almost as to mislead the world into believing that the obligation of withdrawal devolves on Pakistan unilaterally. A reference to the provisions of Part II of the resolution of 13 August, 1948 and the elucidations given by the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan to the Government of Pakistan, established beyond any possibility of dispute the reciprocal nature of the undertaking given by the two sides to withdraw their armed forces from the state of Jammu and Kashmir

 

[vijayjha]

Stop spamming every thread with the same stupid video.
Has been discussed and debunked many times:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/chri...-of-trash-ive-seen.444780/page-4#post-8586944

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/chri...-piece-of-trash-ive-seen.444780/#post-8585207




A little Correction:

Step 1. A Truce Agreement is concluded
Step 2. Pakistan begins withdrawing its troops
Step 3. India too begins withdrawing its troops (to a minimum level) while Pakistani troops are being withdrawn
Step 4. Plebiscite by UN

A Truce Agreement was never reached because India rejected all demilitarization plans proposed by the UN. Pakistan accepted all.

As Truce Agreement could not be concluded, the Commission never notified Pakistan to begin withdrawing its forces.

Pakistan had made it clear to the UN that it was ready to withdraw its troops as soon as the Commission notified it,

Pakistan went a step further and told the UN that it was ready to withdraw its troops in favor of UN troops regardless of Indian reaction to such a proposal ...


There's a reason for which the UN appointed official mediator (i.e Sir Owen Dixon) blamed India and not Pakistan for halting the process ...


Pakistan stands ready to conclude a truce agreement with India, even today ...


=======

Some hard facts for you our ignorant Indian friend:

• India, in an attempt to deceive the world, seeks to fasten on Pakistan a responsibility to withdraw troops from Jammu and Kashmir unilaterally and unconditionally, by quoting out of context a certain provision of UN Commission’s resolution of 13 August 1948, that is, Part 11, paragraph A.I.

• While doing so, India deliberately suppresses the other paragraphs of Part II. The Indians are guilty of suppressio veri and suggestio falsi.

• These subsequent paragraphs make it obvious that the obligation of Pakistan to withdraw its troops from the state of Jammu and Kashmir does not devolve until both sides conclude a truce agreement to govern the withdrawal of not only Pakistan forces but also the bulk of the Indian armed forces from the state

• The reciprocal obligations of the two sides as to the modalities of demilitarization, have been persistently sought to be confused by India over the past 70 years almost as to mislead the world into believing that the obligation of withdrawal devolves on Pakistan unilaterally. A reference to the provisions of Part II of the resolution of 13 August, 1948 and the elucidations given by the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan to the Government of Pakistan, established beyond any possibility of dispute the reciprocal nature of the undertaking given by the two sides to withdraw their armed forces from the state of Jammu and Kashmir

Now the point is you have to vacate kashmir , so what any the area u sold to china ? Pak has to hand over that part also to india for plebiscite to happen. But I don't think chinA will give back.

 

[M. Sarmad]

Now the point is you have to vacate kashmir , so what any the area u sold to china ? Pak has to hand over that part also to india for plebiscite to happen. But I don't think chinA will give back.

Pakistan is under no obligation to withdraw its troops from Kashmir unconditionally and unilaterally. Read the previous post carefully.

As for the Sino-Pak boundary agreement of 1963:

1) Pakistan did not give away any land to China, it actually gained 850 sq km of territory previously under Chinese control

2) The area in question is uninhabited, 'plebiscite' in that area is out of the question

3) Sino-Pak boundary agreement of 1963 is provisional. In case Kashmiris decide to join India (in a free and fair plebiscite) China will renegotiate the boundary with India as per the agreement.

For details:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/what...-know-the-sino-pak-boundary-agreement.310842/
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/refu...shmir-and-sino-pak-boundary-agreement.543016/

 

[vijayjha]

Pakistan is under no obligation to withdraw its troops from Kashmir unconditionally and unilaterally. Read the previous post carefully.

As for the Sino-Pak boundary agreement of 1963:

1) Pakistan did not give away any land to China, it actually gained 850 sq km of territory previously under Chinese control

2) The area in question is uninhabited, 'plebiscite' in that area is out of the question

3) Sino-Pak boundary agreement of 1963 is provisional. In case Kashmiris decide to join India (in a free and fair plebiscite) China will renegotiate the boundary with India as per the agreement.

For details:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/what...-know-the-sino-pak-boundary-agreement.310842/
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/refu...shmir-and-sino-pak-boundary-agreement.543016/

Article says pak has to vacate kashmir, kashmir area belonged to king hari singh. It doesn't say that pak can do shareef it wants with area with no population.
It's an assumption from pak. U had no right to trade any land of kashmir but u did so how can u expect india to reciprocate.