Jackdaws
BANNED
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/airchiefmarshal.jpg)
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2010
- Messages
- 13,114
- Reaction score
- -49
- Country
- Location
I have no clue what you Googled.Well, I know what I am talking about. Still, I googled it to see what you were trying to say.
The very first result that turned up was an article by a well-known Indian Scholar stating :
... Pakistan demurred at first, but agreed. It fell through because Nehru did not accept the conditions in which the plebiscite could be held .... Dixon, on August 15, won Liaquat's clearance for his plan...
https://frontline.thehindu.com/static/html/fl1921/stories/20021025002508200.htm
We don't need to take it to the ICJ as long as UNMOGIP is present in India and Pakistan, and Kashmir remains on the agenda of the UNSC as an unresolved international dispute, even after 47 years of the signing of the Simla Agreement. It's you who believes that UN Resolutions have become invalid now. You guys need to take it to the ICJ if you cannot (or don't want to) expel UNMOGIP from India
Of course, it is not your fault. You guys have been fed propaganda and lies.
According to the Indian commentator Raghavan, it was first Nehru who proposed a partition-cum-plebiscite plan: Jammu and Ladakh would go to India, Azad Kashmir and Northern Areas to Pakistan, and a plebiscite would be held in the Kashmir Valley. Dixon favoured the plan, which bears his name till this day.[36] Dixon agreed that people in Jammu and Ladakh were clearly in favour of India; equally clearly, those in Azad Kashmir and the Northern Areas wanted to be part of Pakistan. This left the Kashmir Valley and 'perhaps some adjacent country' around Muzaffarabad in uncertain political terrain. However, according to Dixon, Pakistan "bluntly rejected" the proposal. It believed that the plebiscite should be held in the entire state or the state should be partitioned along religious lines.
Source -
Snedden, Christopher (2005), "Would a plebiscite have resolved the Kashmir dispute?", South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 28 (1): 64–86,
It's obvious who has been fed lies and propaganda.
Well, I know what I am talking about. Still, I googled it to see what you were trying to say.
The very first result that turned up was an article by a well-known Indian Scholar stating :
... Pakistan demurred at first, but agreed. It fell through because Nehru did not accept the conditions in which the plebiscite could be held .... Dixon, on August 15, won Liaquat's clearance for his plan...
https://frontline.thehindu.com/static/html/fl1921/stories/20021025002508200.htm
We don't need to take it to the ICJ as long as UNMOGIP is present in India and Pakistan, and Kashmir remains on the agenda of the UNSC as an unresolved international dispute, even after 47 years of the signing of the Simla Agreement. It's you who believes that UN Resolutions have become invalid now. You guys need to take it to the ICJ if you cannot (or don't want to) expel UNMOGIP from India
Of course, it is not your fault. You guys have been fed propaganda and lies.
Additionally, India offered 1500 sq miles of the valley to Pak after 1962.
Pak rejected it.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/How-Bhutto-wrecked-a-Kashmir-solution/articleshow/7244572.cms