it has been proved every single time someone tried to implement it through revolution that communism is a total failure, it only sounds good on paper.. as a species, we are not idealists, we are ambitious, we want to work and get rewarded for it...
typical indian fence sitting... wait for other societies to do something and deem it success or failure... and in the meantime, since india is complicated and immediate-term planning, most indians would ideally want other humans to be live unnecessarily complicated lives with immediate-term planning.
which is why the indian rich are most petty traders ( like ambani, yen aar narayamurthy, "snapdeal" company ) who want money back by the evening or in three months time... no longer-term goals.
little north korea has achieved much more than india... private company spacex has achieved in 12 years what isro couldn't in 50+ years... why??
having said that, I completely get the criticism of the market economy system, and much of it is warranted, but it's all we have, and we must work within it in a balanced way.
and your solution is...??
save yourself, stop preaching this commie crap.. "world without money system" yeah right
even now in india, some people are surprised when i tell them about interest-less economics, a idea from 2000 years ago... these people are surprised despite farmer/office-work/general sucides.
I have better chances of getting an earth without a gravity system
i will give you something better.
if a mad-man with elon musk's capabilities brought three one-kilometer-wide asteroids and smashed it into earth, you will have a earth without much life.
No,conventional type.any problem on that?
1. nuclear fusion electric generation or nuclear fusion controlled-heating reactor doesn't exist... the iter project has failed to demonstrate fusion electricity and has become a way for mathematicians to earn phd's in physics... a nuclear fusion in-space propulsion engine would be similar to the american "nerva" project (
NERVA (Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Application) ) which was fission.
2. helium-3 is available on earth and can be potentially used to build the in-space fusion propulsion engine that isro has been speaking of all these years.
so why is isro insisting on using a future chandrayaan ( not definite ) to search for helium-3 on the moon... who will build the reactor, isro or non-indians??
what isro is doing is not looking at a simple engine like vasimr (
Our Engine | Ad Astra Rocket )
in the now, which can provide immediate in-space propulsion and are safe, though will require big electricity from sources like solar ( photovoltaic or thermal ) or some other source.
isro is simply dilly-dallying on real-space human missions and wasting earth's resources on useless satellites, especially the spy ones ( the so-called remote sensing ).