What's new

New Delhi will keep Islamabad out of BRICS regional meet

IS KEEPING PAKISTAN OUT while inviting all other regional countries a GOOD MOVE by India


  • Total voters
    47
Status
Not open for further replies.
where is Pakistan....Microscope will not help also
Hidden away somewhere behind this (below) giant Indian economic supa pawa ...

01-POD-may-day-IndiaInk-blog480.jpg


Pakistan needs to convince 2 million of these Indian man mules to mover over to Pak. Should increase the GDP fair bit?
 
Hidden away somewhere behind this (below) giant Indian economic supa pawa ...

01-POD-may-day-IndiaInk-blog480.jpg


Pakistan needs to convince 2 million of these Indian man mules to mover over to Pak. Should increase the GDP fair bit?
If India is soo poor and helpless .. why doesn't pak use it's brain power(thorugh which it ruled the subcontinent for 1000yrs allegedly ) and China use it's economic might to grab their respective claimed territories?

Should be easy right. Put your money where the mouth is.
 
I voted "Yes" to India keeping out Pakistan. As long as the "big red 'un" are in Pakistan has no worries. How can you be islolated with 1,300 million Chinese as "mates"? That is like next 50 countries in population combined ...

flag.GIF



Brics is China. This below is Brics. The C is bigger then BRIS put together.


BRICS-GDP.png

BRICS doesn't have the policy of 'large GDP = more say'.

It works on "one country one vote".

Which means South Africa has as much say as we or China or Russia or Brazil have.

The grouping is about EQUAL SAYING in economic sphere.

If this also talks about GDP size, then what's the use of creating another WTO type of organisation?

Equality and rationality is the theme of BRICS.

Not military.
 
Should be easy right
1 Ant is nothing. 1,300 Ants can do a lot ....
 
GDP-projections-to-2050-g-008.jpg


https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/jan/07/gdp-projections-china-us-uk-brazil#data
@Mo12 we may even be second :cheers:


I dont understand. Why Should Pakistan be there in the first place. Its BRICS without pakistan.
There is nothing they can contribute to world economy... I can't remember one USP of pak economy... not a single one... wait they did make bladders for FIFA footballs i guess. Why should they be invited to an economic grouping?
 
1 Ant is nothing. 1,300 Ants can do a lot ....
Agreed. But have the pakistanis and sub continental muslims proven themselves superior historically?
If not for numbers, they have proven the political brains to rule the subcontinent for 1000yrs as claimed by them(you).
Why not use that brain and cleverness?
paksitanis go on and on about the various minorities and groups in india bein oppressed ... if they know that much .. rest should be easy right?
 
Two can play the game. There are many weak points in both countries. Every action will have a reaction.

Exactly, at this point in time, you are the only one playing the dirty game under the radar, it will be level playing field in future.
 
Good. That means India can't curry up anything really bad against Pak since it would not pass muster with Chinks. Checkmate ....

It is a consensus based process. Which also means China cannot do jack if all don't agree.

Falls both ways.
 
BRICS would get VETO right at IMF:

https://www.rt.com/business/330438-imf-quota-brics-russia-china/


The 2010 IMF reforms called for an increase in China’s voting share from 3.8 percent to 6 percent, while the US would see its share shaved from 16.7 percent to 16.5 percent and preserve its veto.

The reforms were part of President Obama's effort to keep China happy and within the Bretton Woods system, but stalled in Congress over Republican concerns.

The US is the biggest member of the IMF and is the only one to have a veto, as 15 percent is a blocking share.

Despite the increased quotas, BRICS countries will still only have a 14.7 percent voting share, not enough for a veto.

According to Russia's Deputy Finance Minister and BRICS Bank Russia director Sergey Storchak, Moscow will work to get the veto right for the five major emerging economies.
 
Not military.
Talking of military I have been meaning to ask you. Are you a "Jap" sorry, a Nepali Gurkha on rent to India for a few Rupees ready to turn your guns on Sikhs in Amritsar or are you some Ganga-wala wishing his dad had been a Nepali Gurkha?

I know some of these "Japs" from Nepal are also on rent to UK but get paid Sterling Pound.

voDvBfQ.png



Falls both ways.
Therefore all this BRICS means Zero worries for Pakistan. Lets go home ....


sub continental muslims
The only thing common with them is they all carry circumcised tackle - so does 1/3 of earth. So stop lumping us together.
 
Last edited:
Talking of military I have been meaning to ask you. Are you a "Jap" sorry, a Nepali Gurkha on rent to India for a few Rupees ready to turn your guns on Sikhs in Amritsar or are you some Ganga-wala wishing his dad had been a Nepali Gurkha?

I know some of these "Japs" from Nepal are also on rent to UK but get paid Sterling Pound.
.

@waz @Oscar @WebMaster

Racism. Since when is this tolerated?
 
Agreed. But have the pakistanis and sub continental muslims proven themselves superior historically?
If not for numbers, they have proven the political brains to rule the subcontinent for 1000yrs as claimed by them(you).
Why not use that brain and cleverness?

We're using that well to thwart off a 1.5 billion population. All you have is numbers.
 
Where? Please? What are crying on about ... child?
 
@waz @Oscar @WebMaster

Racism. Since when is this tolerated?

What is racist? Ganga-wala? You can call us Indus-wala if you want. it's not racist, it's true.
 
Where? Please? What are crying on about ... child?

Go figure.

What is racist? Ganga-wala? You can call us Indus-wala if you want. it's not racist, it's true.
Then report it and get it removed or get that user banned. No point telling me. I am not a mod.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom