it's not only america but nobody else other than pakistan recognise mukthi bahini as terrorists.they were just armed militants/ revolutionarys who fought against partiality of west pakistan.
At that time only west was the real power. If it was today, China would certainly call it a terrorist group. The episode is long over now and no body cares about it anymore. West doesn't call Jundullah a terrorist group, it doesn't mean it isn't. It all depends on whose side these groups are.. Mukhti Bahini was a terrorist group, and that's all that matters.
bangladesh ministers allegation is certainly old but enough to prove that it not only india+afghan.
We're talking about what's happening today. If you look carefully, it was "water resources minister" who made these comments. You talk about how this effects perception. The only place it made a difference was Bharat.
please provide me the link Uk PM'S correction of words.
I don't have time to dig it up, but what he said was that "I was referring to the people and not the government". If you don't believe me then it doesn't matter, you should look at the fall out of his comments. It was him who was on the back foot after the comments, not Pakistan. Besides, a conspiracy theory is a conspiracy theory.
i have posted wiki chief and admiral mullan and poland ministers comments kindly check it.
We've discussed where the wikileaks cables came from. It was from paid afghan informants.
As for mullan, well the US government itself dismissed the cables and said that they get filtered through - these ones don't make it through. That says a lot.
american parliamentarians considers LSE study report seriously.they asked us officers view on that.
I didn't hear anything such. If it was true then it'd been posted on this forum a long time ago. Besides, American Parliamentarians also considered Iraq having WMDs as serious
.
finally international matters matters are rarely work on proof rather it works on primary evidences, intelligence from reliable sources and once that is available it then comes to power of politics and media.that's how pakistan accepted kasab is pakistani citizen..if there was on pressure pakistan would not have accepted that also..and there is no strong enough mechanism to prove such cases when culprit and evidence seeker is the same.
and let me tell you that india asking evidence also is part of the game..like pakistan india also will deny the evidence if there is any unless some undeniable evidence comes across which is very unlikely.
Primary evidence IS proof. If you can't back up what you say with proof then one doesn't need to look further. What you say becomes a conspiracy theory.
Look at how far the current allegations against ISI go. Someone in the media talks about it one day, and one hour later it is forgotten that the allegations have even been made. Do you see any serious effort to name and blame ISI? All you see is stuff one day and next day no one cares about it. Again, you talk about how perceptions matter. Well look at that.
Look at the LSE report. When was the last time you hear anyone talk about it? Outside Bharat? Only bharatis still remember it. Same with the wikileaks allegations. You talk about perceptions, look at that for perception. If ISI is supporting Taliban then it would have been a much bigger deal from the western countries as their military is fighting there. But what you here is empty words once every year or so to pressurize Pakisan into doing certain things. You talk about perceptions, you should realize that the allegations against ISI are not really as popular as you've made yourself believe.
Again, the only place where these conspiracy theories are popular is bharat. Outside bharat, it is mentioned once a year and even then no one gives a sh*t about it. Like I said, it is said one day and forgotten the next. Well except in Bharat. Only ones to remember it are Indians.
