NDTV’s Nidhi Razdan hailed after she tells BJP’s Sambit Patra to ‘apologise or leave my show’

[911]

these fake bravado should be kept tightly inside ur behind.
when, for thousands of manusmrti years, ur ancestors were beaten, killed, raped, burnt, humiliated and isolated from the ones you are taking ur side, where was this bravado ?
first think of urselves, then think of the bovine mata.
otherwise, the baaps, for whom u lick a$$, will give u a bata, tata.

mullah miyan keep calm

 

[salarsikander]

It's a valid and genuine question, which I hope some of you would address.

But please do not be rude bro.

Like I said first., do not bring Pakistan into your shit slinging contest simple Adil!

As for your non sense question make a new thread and then ask. The thread is far too polluted and impure.

 

[padamchen]

Like I said first., do not bring Pakistan into your shit slinging contest simple Adil!

As for your non sense question make a new thread and then ask. The thread is far too polluted and impure.

No worries.

 

[Gadkari]

Please do not be a moron.

Faredoon is a Persian name. Not Muslim.

LOL..... how many times do I have to prove you wrong for you finally admit that you don't know Jack $Hit ?

Feroz Gandhi's full name was Feroz Jahangir Khan Gandhi.

His Fathers name was Jehangir Faredoon Khan.

His GrandFather was Nawab Khan from Bharuch. (some distant claims of relationship with the nawab of Junagadh)

Jahangir Khan was kicked out of his home for marrying a parsi woman, but he did not care since he was an officer in the British Navy. (Think of the movie Rustum and his anglo indian wife)

That is why after his death, his parsi wife had to take Feroz gandhi and move to the home of her Parsi aunt and not back to his father house.

Even Jahangir is a Persian name , even Aurangzeb is a persian name. Even Shahjahan is a persian name


The congress has tried to scrub this fact from the pages of history, but the truth will always triump in the end. Satyameva jayathe.

 

[padamchen]

LOL..... how many times do I have to prove you wrong for you finally admit that you don't know Jack $Hit ?

Feroz Gandhi's full name was Feroz Jahangir Khan Gandhi.

His Fathers name was Jehangir Faredoon Khan.

His GrandFather was Nawab Khan from Bharuch. (some distant claims of relationship with the nawab of Junagadh)

Jahangir Khan was kicked out of his home for marrying a parsi woman, but he did not care since he was an officer in the British Navy. (Think of the movie Rustum and his anglo indian wife)

That is why after his death, his parsi wife had to take Feroz gandhi and move to the home of her Parsi aunt and not back to his father house.

Even Jahangir is a Persian name , even Aurangzeb is a persian name. Even Shahjahan is a persian name


The congress has tried to scrub this fact from the pages of history, but the truth will always triump in the end. Satyameva jayathe.

Ok.

I really don't give a fig what a sanghi believes.

 

[Gadkari]

Ok.

I really don't give a fig what a sanghi believes.

You apparently don't really give a fig about the truth either

There is nothing to be ashamed about being a muslim, ever wonder WHY the gandhi's tried to HIDE this fact ?

Indira Gandhi got married in 1941 when there was NO LAW governing Inter Religious marriage. The special marriage act was passed only in 1954.

Before that, to get married with someone of a different religion, one of the individual HAD to change their religion and as usual with "Love Jihad", its ALWAYS the Hindu women who change their religion when they marry a muslim.

So HOW did Indira Gandhi marry a Muslim Feroz Gandhi when the LAW DID NOT PERMIT IT ? She temporarily took up Islam (Think of how Dharmedra married Hema Malini) and chose the name Mainuna Begum and THEN had the NIKKAH with Feroz Gandhi.

 

[bhimram]

Ok.

I really don't give a fig what a sanghi believes.

Baba Bhim trusted Sanghis more than he trusted Nehru or Gandhi.

Let us Dalits know why we should believe your narrative more than what Bhim told us?

 

[baajey]

Good morning guys.
@bhimram , the "Ambekar liked/endorsed RSS" charade is too much to take.
You have anything to substantiate the above ?
To my knowledge it was the opposite.
A very apt answer from Quora:

Dr. Bhimrao Ramaji Ambedkar, the chief architect of Indian constitution is one of the most revered figure, whose legacy is being hijacked by all the political parties to consolidate Dalit votes.

For this reason all are concerned, what were B.R.Ambedkar’s views about them. Parties are sifting the old documents and bookd to find a favorable remark about them, use it without context to claim his legacy.

RSS although as claimed, is not a political party but they are doing the job for the political party which promotes them. So RSS is flashing this comment from B.R.Ambedkar.

Dr. Ambedkar in 1939:

“This is the first time that I am visiting the camp of Sangh volunteers. I am happy to find absolute equality between Savarniyas (Upper Caste) and Harijans (Lower Caste) without any one being aware of such difference existing.”

The irony here is that B.R. Ambedkar burnt the copy of Manusmriti for its castist laws which caused thousands of years of Dalit opression and persecution. RSSs second chief M.S.Golwalkar, fondly called Guruji, said about Manu.

“Was the first the wisest and the greatest lawgiver in the history of mankind.”

RSS never really distanced, itself from Guruji’s views about Manu or Manusmrity. Golwalkar on many occaissions endorsed and praised Caste system in India. To take both M.S.Golwalkar and B.R. Ambedkar on their side is like riding two horses, both going in opposite direction.

Quote from Babasaheb Ambedkar: in protest of Hindu caste system:

“Though, I was born a Hindu, I solemnly assure you that I will not die as a Hindu.”

While RSS believes in supremacy of Hinduism and Dr. Ambedkar was disgusted with it. Dr. Ambedkar always spoke against extreme form of Hindutva. Because of injustice faced by him he renounced Hindu faith and converted to Buddhism. His views about RSS are not direct but about Hinduism.

“Slavery will not be tolerated in the name of religion. This Manusmriti, in the very first chapter says that Brahmans are created from Brahma’s (creator’s) head, Kshatriya from his hands, Vaishyas from his thighs and Shudras from his feet. By burning this Manusmriti, we launch a mission to uproot casteism from its roots. But getting rid of caste alone is not our goal, this is the beginning of social revolution which would end Brahman hegemony.”

“A bitter thing cannot be made sweet. The taste of anything can be changed. But poison cannot be changed into nectar.” (in response to Mahatma Gandhi's efforts to reclaim Dalits back into the Hindu fold.)

“…no one can doubt that there was a time when Hindus, both Brahmins and non-Brahmins, ate not only flesh but also beef.”

“I will not believe in Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesh. Neither would I worship them.”

These are Dr. Ambedkars views about caste system and RSS which supports it covertly.

Dr BR Ambedkar: Five quotes that show he was opposed to RSS’ brand of Hinduism

4.2k Views ·

mullah miyan keep calm

India vs pak today, n u expect me to keep calm.
Abbey, TV rights ke liye yudhhh chal raha hai gear pe.

 

[bhimram]

Good morning guys.
@bhimram , the "Ambekar liked/endorsed RSS" charade is too much to take.
You have anything to substantiate the above ?
To my knowledge it was the opposite.
A very apt answer from Quora:

Dr. Bhimrao Ramaji Ambedkar, the chief architect of Indian constitution is one of the most revered figure, whose legacy is being hijacked by all the political parties to consolidate Dalit votes.

For this reason all are concerned, what were B.R.Ambedkar’s views about them. Parties are sifting the old documents and bookd to find a favorable remark about them, use it without context to claim his legacy.

RSS although as claimed, is not a political party but they are doing the job for the political party which promotes them. So RSS is flashing this comment from B.R.Ambedkar.

Dr. Ambedkar in 1939:

“This is the first time that I am visiting the camp of Sangh volunteers. I am happy to find absolute equality between Savarniyas (Upper Caste) and Harijans (Lower Caste) without any one being aware of such difference existing.”

The irony here is that B.R. Ambedkar burnt the copy of Manusmriti for its castist laws which caused thousands of years of Dalit opression and persecution. RSSs second chief M.S.Golwalkar, fondly called Guruji, said about Manu.

“Was the first the wisest and the greatest lawgiver in the history of mankind.”

RSS never really distanced, itself from Guruji’s views about Manu or Manusmrity. Golwalkar on many occaissions endorsed and praised Caste system in India. To take both M.S.Golwalkar and B.R. Ambedkar on their side is like riding two horses, both going in opposite direction.

Quote from Babasaheb Ambedkar: in protest of Hindu caste system:

“Though, I was born a Hindu, I solemnly assure you that I will not die as a Hindu.”

While RSS believes in supremacy of Hinduism and Dr. Ambedkar was disgusted with it. Dr. Ambedkar always spoke against extreme form of Hindutva. Because of injustice faced by him he renounced Hindu faith and converted to Buddhism. His views about RSS are not direct but about Hinduism.

“Slavery will not be tolerated in the name of religion. This Manusmriti, in the very first chapter says that Brahmans are created from Brahma’s (creator’s) head, Kshatriya from his hands, Vaishyas from his thighs and Shudras from his feet. By burning this Manusmriti, we launch a mission to uproot casteism from its roots. But getting rid of caste alone is not our goal, this is the beginning of social revolution which would end Brahman hegemony.”

“A bitter thing cannot be made sweet. The taste of anything can be changed. But poison cannot be changed into nectar.” (in response to Mahatma Gandhi's efforts to reclaim Dalits back into the Hindu fold.)

“…no one can doubt that there was a time when Hindus, both Brahmins and non-Brahmins, ate not only flesh but also beef.”

“I will not believe in Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesh. Neither would I worship them.”

These are Dr. Ambedkars views about caste system and RSS which supports it covertly.


4.2k Views ·


India vs pak today, n u expect me to keep calm.
Abbey, TV rights ke liye yudhhh chal raha hai gear pe.

Sir, Bhim did comment about the caste demolition of RSS long back.
Regarding Mansmriti, what do I care about it? My issue with Hinduism is primarily caste discrimination and not Manusmriti. Manusmriti is a red herring. No Hindu including the upper castes follow it. You can't even find it in 99.99% book stores. No Hindu cares if you burn Manusmriti or tear it or use it to wipe oneself.

The quote which you so easily dismiss is from Bhim himself. So, I don't understand why a victim of caste discrimination need to look at anything beyond RSS being caste neutral?!

RSS supports caste system "covertly"? Why should anyone take that for a fact when Bhim himself says otherwise?
RSS for all it's faults is the "only" organization that does not do caste politics. Rest all, including BJP, including each and every party does it for political gains.

We can agree to disagree. I primarily look to Hinduism because it is the only religion that is looking to change itself, reform itself. Other's don't.

 

[baajey]

Sir, Bhim did comment about the caste demolition of RSS long back.
Regarding Mansmriti, what do I care about it? My issue with Hinduism is primarily caste discrimination and not Manusmriti. Manusmriti is a red herring. No Hindu including the upper castes follow it. You can't even find it in 99.99% book stores. No Hindu cares if you burn Manusmriti or tear it or use it to wipe oneself.

The quote which you so easily dismiss is from Bhim himself. So, I don't understand why a victim of caste discrimination need to look at anything beyond RSS being caste neutral?!

RSS supports caste system "covertly"? Why should anyone take that for a fact when Bhim himself says otherwise?
RSS for all it's faults is the "only" organization that does not do caste politics. Rest all, including BJP, including each and every party does it for political gains.

We can agree to disagree. I primarily look to Hinduism because it is the only religion that is looking to change itself, reform itself. Other's don't.

his quotes were selectively picked out....for obvious purposes.
apart from that i kinda agree to ur thinking.

 

[padamchen]

Baba Bhim trusted Sanghis more than he trusted Nehru or Gandhi.

Let us Dalits know why we should believe your narrative more than what Bhim told us?

I don't give a fig what dalit sanghis believe either.

Get off your entitlement high horse.

 

[bhimram]

his quotes were selectively picked out....for obvious purposes.
apart from that i kinda agree to ur thinking.

The way I see it, nothing is perfect, including us Dalits. I don't see how we can be enemies of Hindus and yet ask them to be nice to us. I don't see how that would work out. They are reaching out, if not all, majority of them. We can either extend our hand or spit on their extended hand.

We have become political pawns in last 2 decades. Where is our next Kanshi Ram?!! We have pathetic Mayawati who is destroying us or the moronic commies bent on using us as cannon fodder for their naxal movement. Less said about Congress the better.

Where the hell is the next great dalit leader?! Why is it that we are used as cannon fodder by secular parties to score points with BJP? Constitution says a converted person does not have reservation rights. Yet, tens of thousands of converts still claim reservation. How and why are we letting this happen!

 

[CBU-105]

I don't give a fig what dalit sanghis believe either.

Get off your entitlement high horse.

ah, back to playing your dalit/xtian character again, Adil ?

very well, lagey raho.

 

[bhimram]

I don't give a fig what dalit sanghis believe either.

Get off your entitlement high horse.

I am not asking you to believe anything.

 

[padamchen]

You apparently don't really give a fig about the truth either

There is nothing to be ashamed about being a muslim, ever wonder WHY the gandhi's tried to HIDE this fact ?

Indira Gandhi got married in 1941 when there was NO LAW governing Inter Religious marriage. The special marriage act was passed only in 1954.

Before that, to get married with someone of a different religion, one of the individual HAD to change their religion and as usual with "Love Jihad", its ALWAYS the Hindu women who change their religion when they marry a muslim.

So HOW did Indira Gandhi marry a Muslim Feroz Gandhi when the LAW DID NOT PERMIT IT ? She temporarily took up Islam (Think of how Dharmedra married Hema Malini) and chose the name Mainuna Begum and THEN had the NIKKAH with Feroz Gandhi.

Yes buddy.

I've read the sanghi playbook.

It does not wash on multiple levels, but Mainly on the one called REALITY.

You do not have a clue but are mouthing off what has been fed to you.

Because the Congress and the Gandhi's are your mortal foes.

Because they've reduced you and your type to a caricature for a large part of the last hundred years.

Nothing wrong in being a Muslim.

But when one tries so frantically to prove a Zoroastrian Parsi to be a Muslim, one understands instinctively why it's done.

Cheers.

I am not asking you to believe anything.

You don't understand English too well.

I said I do not give a fig what you or your type believe.

Which is not the same as believing myself.

It's simply not giving a fig about you and yours.

Cheers.