What's new

Nawaz Sharif & Pakistan's Cruise Missile Program l A betrayal to the Oath & PM Office

Have you ever read this book written by a bounty hunter while still under oath?


Look brother, it's pointless trying to preach let's only go after the three time Democratically Elected Prime Minister and bury the head in the sand with regards to everyone else.
The fact that this ghaddar oaf was PM 3 times should enough to wake you up

The fact that he will sacrifice PAKISTANS defence for his personal idiotic greed should be enough to condemn him


He should never be allowed to set foot in Pakistan ever again
 
Have you ever read this book written by a bounty hunter while still under oath?


Look brother, it's pointless trying to preach let's only go after the three time Democratically Elected Prime Minister and bury the head in the sand with regards to everyone else.
if the establishment is fixing elections till now as PMLN claims then Nawaz himself is three times selected PM not democratically elected PM
 
... The fact that he will sacrifice PAKISTANS defence for his personal idiotic greed should be enough to condemn him ...

The only three times Democratically Elected Prime Minister under whose leadership Pakistani territory increased on 19 March 2015:

Pakistan seabed territory grows by 50,000 square kilometres

Against the only Prime Minister under whose leadership India annexed Indian Occupied Kashmir without firing a single bullet on 5 August 2019.
 
Have you ever read this book written by a bounty hunter while still under oath?


Look brother, it's pointless trying to preach let's only go after the three time Democratically Elected Prime Minister and bury the head in the sand with regards to everyone else.
I have read his book. The urdu version sub sa phela pakistan. Again Musharraf was allowed by none other than Nawaz Sharif to escape. So if you want to complain for letting him go please do so with the people who actually did that. It was the nawaz led government that let him go in the first place.
 
... Again Musharraf was allowed by none other than Nawaz Sharif to escape. So if you want to complain for letting him go please do so with the people who actually did that. It was the nawaz led government that let him go in the first place.

Under what pressure? From those gun-totting who umpired the 126-day long foreign funded dharna and believing they are simply above the rest?

Musharraf can ‘never be a traitor’: Pakistan Army in ‘pain and anguish’ after treason case verdict

584760_4797348_dg-uis_updates.jpg

Director General Inter-Services Public Relations Major General Asif Ghafoor issued an official statement today on behalf of the armed forces — File photo
 
Last edited:
Samar Mubarakmand rebuts Nawaz’s claim of reverse engineering of US missile
Web Desk On Oct 2, 2020 Last updated Oct 2, 2020


ISLAMABAD: Nuclear scientist Dr Samar Mubarakmand on Thursday termed former prime minister Nawaz Sharif’s claim of reverse engineering of a US missile as ridiculous, ARY News reported.


Talking to journalists, Dr Samar Mubarakmand said that he did not agree with the former prime minister’s claim that they developed their own missile by reverse engineering of a US Tomahawk missile landed undamaged in Baluchistan during a US strike on Afghanistan in 1998.

He maintained that a cruise missile broke into pieces after falling on the ground. The nuclear scientist clarified that they had found only few pieces of the missile in 1998, adding that the pieces were useless.

Pakistan would have returned the debris of the missile if the United States had demanded, he added. What research can be done on the destroyed debris and small pieces? asked Mubarakmand.


Earlier on 30th of September, former prime minister Nawaz Sharif had started revealing national secrets and took credit for equipping the country with cruise missiles.

Talking to media in London, the PML-N supreme leader claimed that Pakistan had built its missiles by copying American missiles through reverse engineering and he had given cruise missiles to the country.

Nawaz Sharif had said, “The United States had fired missiles at Afghanistan during the war which landed in Balochistan. We made our missiles by copying the US missiles.”

-------------------------
 
The only three times Democratically Elected Prime Minister under whose leadership Pakistani territory increased on 19 March 2015:

Pakistan seabed territory grows by 50,000 square kilometres

Against the only Prime Minister under whose leadership India annexed Indian Occupied Kashmir without firing a single bullet on 5 August 2019.


😂😂😂😂

You are more loyal to that fat ghaddar then you are to Pakistan

Our plans are finally working against India because our state is finally united

We don't have Military and ISI trying to counter India and our PM inviting Modi for weddings and dealing with Indian businessmen



We have IK hitting India on international forums whilst the ISI and military alongside our allies hits India everywhere else

The poison within India does the rest



We can't go back to the Bhutto's zardaris and sharifs


Pick a side it's PAKISTAN or them
 
Please! If a 3 time PM with 2/3rd majority gets pressurized than the blames lies on him for being a pussy and no one else.

Can't expect a civilian Government to confront so many gun-totting Generals all the time who are obsessed with the kursi. Heck, they would even umpire a foreign-funded 126-long dharna to weaken a democratically elected Government.

It's like Turkish gun-totting Generals against President Erdogan, who finally had enough of them and in one major swoop locked up hundreds of thousands of traitors.

So I ask, should a democratically elected Prime Minister in a civilised nation need to always be looking over his shoulder against those whose loyalties more align with the dollar instead of Pakistan? Does some democratically elected Prime Minister of Pakistan need to apply the Turkish model?
 
Last edited:
Can't expect a civilian Government to confront so many gun-totting Generals all the time who are obsessed with the kursi. Heck, they would even umpire a foreign-funded 126-long dharna to weaken a democratically elected Government.

It's like Turkish gun-totting Generals against President Erdogan, who finally had enough of them and in one major swoop locked up hundreds of thousands of traitors.

So I ask, should a democratically elected Prime Minister in a civilised nation need to always be looking over his shoulder against those whose loyalties more align with the dollar instead of Pakistan? Does some democratically elected Prime Minister of Pakistan need to apply the Turkish model?

The key problem with your analogy is that NS is no Erdogan. Erdogan defined a "new" cultural identity and narrative for the Turks, revamped the intelligence apparatus, is extremely aggressive with Turkey's enemies, isn't scared of the West and transformed his country's economy. This is why people were willing to lie down in front of tanks and unarmed civilians were willing to confront the coup soldiers.
 
3 times chuu.. leader allowed USA to fire those tomahawk missiles to Afghanistan, allowed USA to cross the border of Pakistan to kill some pushtuns. Allowed USA to hit, damage, bomb some Pakistani land if those missiles dropped in Pakistani area. Then where is the sovereignty? Infact not the musharaf but mian sanp was the one who allowed USA to enter in Afghanistan. Allowed USA to kill balochis in chaghai n pushtuns in Afghanistan.
If this credit goes to mian sanp then in abbotabad operation where we got stealth helicopters technology as per some media reports, credit goes to zardari also.
Congratulations Pakistan we have great leaders to serve.
 

Back
Top Bottom