NATO's Shame - NATO Aware it was Firing at Pakistani Troops

[Sugarcane]

did the mentioned shortage of chicken in the report ?



PS: It was North Atlantic Terrorist Organization & United Snakes of America - Routes must be blocked permanently. RAW - see you later

 

[OrionHunter]

Holy crap on a cracker!!!! RAW is capable of this? I thought it was mostly a defunct organization! I need to change my opinion of RAW now, from Worthless to Brilliant!!

Seriously, the plot is simple. Blame RAW and the Afghans - Get NATO off the hook - Open the supply routes - start getting the moolah once again from American coffers.

Elementary, Dr Watson! QED!

 

[iPhone]

I don't think so... the volume of transit of goods via Iran is almost same as Pakistan, than comes Uzbekistan, even lower is Turkmenistan and air transit is lowest.

I'm sorry, US goods are going through Iran?

 

[Jango]

I'm rather waiting for the PA investigation report.

But then, from an army that did not even carry out the investigation of Kargil, OBL raid etc., I do not expect much.

Yeah, if the report does not come out in public and the media dies not do a hoo-ha over it, it does not exist eh?

Don't know about Kargil, but reports and investigations for other incidents have happened and the faulty bolts have been removed.

 

[Irfan Baloch]

I can't believe it... RAW is simply incapable of hatching such a big conspiracy

BBC is being quoted but I didnt find anything on BBC wesite and the news link is express Tribune, I am not aware if its sister organisation or subsidiary of BBC.

 

[Irfan Baloch]

NATO is not going to put blame on India. Its just face saving by Pakistan military. If they found the NATO responsible for the attack in their "investigation" Pakistani public would expect them to do more than "just blocking" the NATO supply line, which they can't afford to.

So put the blame on ANA and India, who are already hated by Pakistanis and seen as the enemy.

DGMO has already given a detailed media briefing blaming NATO

what else do you want? secondly why BBC is being quoted in this report but link is of Express Tribune? I went on BBC website and cant find anything
please link it if I missed it.

Also ISPR has already contradicted this report so i dont know why you chose to ignore these two facts?

1. DGMO blamed NATO
2. ISPR rubbished this news item.

 

[ashokdeiva]

DGMO has alrady given a detailed media briefing blaming NATO

what else do you want? secondly why BBC is being quoted in this report but link is of Express Tribune? I went on BBC website and cant find anything
please link it if I missed it.

Also ISPR has already contradicted this report so i dont know why you chose to ignore these two facts?

1. DGMO blamed NATO
2. ISPR rubbished this news item.

Brother may be this is how Indians and Pakistanis get into a mudsling here at PDF.
They do not see the fact but go on redicule each other over some fan boys post in a thread.
May be they feel at ease when they do a fist fight with each other hitting their key boards.

 

[lem34]

Brother may be this is how Indians and Pakistanis get into a mudsling here at PDF.
They do not see the fact but go on redicule each other over some fan boys post in a thread.
May be they feel at ease when they do a fist fight with each other hitting their key boards.

More than likely this is a ruse by AIPAC run american govt to sow problems betwen pakistan and india

 

[Irfan Baloch]

Tbh I don't really understand either side's reasons behind the attack. The Pakistani side say this was a DELIBERATE attack by NATO who attacked for hours to kill Pakistani soldiers, the question is WHY??? why would NATO, aware of the serious ramifications this would cause, attack and kill these Paksitani soldiers achieving nothing? It makes no sense whatsoever.

only NATO should explain the reason here if any, not the PA, because PA is the recipient of that attack why you expecting them to explain an attack on them which they say was unprovoked?

What is it to ‘understand’ from Pakistani side? the fact is attack happened whether deliberate or not is besides the point.

I agree, it doesn’t make any sense at all to attack 2 check posts that were built by an ally and partner to assist in WoT. But this is something that US attackers have to explain. PA is saying that there was no confusion or misunderstanding because they conveyed the other side that it was their army which was under attack and despite that the attack continued then stopped and then resumed. So all these questions should be taken to ISAF/ US/ NATO command for all its worth. They say it was mistaken identity and anyone who is not part of NATO/ US attack has rubbished that lame excuse so we are back to where? The same confusion why did US attack these posts?

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

I'm rather waiting for the PA investigation report.

But then, from an army that did not even carry out the investigation of Kargil, OBL raid etc., I do not expect much.

The PA has provided a description of the events that tool place on multiple occasions now - in a DGMO presentation to the media, DGMO briefing to parliament, DGMO and DG ISI briefing to the Conference of Pakistani Ambassadors, and the military and diplomatic briefing at the Pakistani Embassy in the US to members of the US media.

So no need to troll and flame.

BTW, ISPR has already issued a statement calling the BBC report 'inaccurate'.

 

[Safriz]

ONLINE - International News Network

---------- Post added at 03:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:18 AM ----------

pakistani embassador to UN says attacks were against UNO charter.

 

[BATMAN]

I'm sorry, US goods are going through Iran?

goods are going through Iran to Afghanistan... who use those goods in Afghanistan is totally the discretion of rulers of Afghanistan.

http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/27157/1/MPRA_paper_27157.pdf

look at the graph at page 3.