What's new

NATO Shifts Supply Lines Away From Pakistan To Central Asia

Uzbek Hub Growing In Prominence


The Northern Distribution Network is expected to play an even more prominent role thanks to the rise in traffic at a little-known logistics hub established by Korean Airlines at Navoi Airport in Uzbekistan in August 2010.

Alexander Cooley, the author of the book “Base Politics” and an assistant professor at Barnard College, says that over the past year air traffic into Navoi has tripled, at least according to Uzbek sources.

“Even though the U.S. military does not like to discuss the various points of origin and entry and so forth,” he says, “we have a pretty good idea that a lot of equipment is also being transported through this particular Uzbek hub.”

Starting in 2010, Korean Airlines has flown regular cargo flights from Incheon (South Korea) to Milan and Brussels via Navoi Airport seven times a week. Additional cargo service has since been inaugurated between Navoi and Delhi, Mumbai, Bangkok, and Frankfurt.

According to information posted on the Navoi terminal’s official website, Korean Airlines will add new cargo routes from Navoi to Istanbul, Dubai, Almaty, and Dhaka (Bangladesh) this year.


Korean Airlines, as the operator of the hub, has also contracted with several companies working for the U.S. Department of Defense. The Pentagon itself has acknowledged using the facility for limited commercial cargo transport.

The U.S. military is tight-lipped about the project, and the authoritarian regime in Uzbekistan maintains tight security around the airport, making it hard to arrive at independent assessments.

Still, experts say Navoi is likely to result in a significant boost of capacity for the Northern Distribution Network. It could also make it easier to transport a wider variety of supplies through the NDN to NATO troops in Afghanistan.

Uzbekistan’s emerging role as a transit hub for NATO supplies to Afghanistan is likely to have a major impact on relations between Tashkent and Washington. In 2005, the U.S. criticized the Uzbek government’s use of deadly force against protesters in Andijon, leading the Uzbeks to evict the Americans from the Kharsi-Khanabad air base, then their main transport hub in the country.

Uzbek President Islam Karimov stands to gain as NATO moves more goods through the NDN.Uzbekistan’s renewed importance as a supply hub could enable Tashkent to push back against Western criticism of its democratization and human rights practices, says Cooley. And, he says, that may not be the only benefit for Uzbek leaders.

“The Uzbek regime is getting considerable transit fees and logistical contracts, many of which are conducted with private companies with suspected close ties to government elites,” Cooley says. “In other words, the economic incentives are important for the Uzbek government.”

Discussions with the Russians seem to be bearing fruit. According to Russian news agencies, the Duma, the lower house of parliament, ratified an agreement on February 25 that would allow the United States to move troops as well as supplies across Russian territory for military operations in Afghanistan.

Many military analysts in Washington regard the move as a sign of Russia’s commitment to helping NATO troops succeed in Afghanistan – support which, at least in the view of some in Washington, has not always been forthcoming.


For all the activity along the Northern Distribution Route, there is little likelihood the northern route will supplant the line of communications through Pakistan any time soon. Still, there is little doubt that officials in Moscow and the capitals of Central Asia have every reason to welcome the benefits that supply routes are bringing them.


Full article
Central Asia Stands To Gain As NATO Shifts Supply Lines Away From Pakistan - Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty © 2011
 
. .
It means Imran khan succeeded in its mission

the other option to stop drones attacks are to shot them
 
.
China cannot pressure Russia. Or Russia will not do anything because they ave support on US regarding Afghanistan thanks to Chechnya and business.

russia is shameless coward country, there respect was burried alongwith there shameful defeat in afghanistan, do u guys no think that thy have lost golden chance of revange in same country with same players, they can easily arms the taliban against usa
 
.
russia is shameless coward country, there respect was burried alongwith there shameful lost in afghanistan, do u guys no think that thy have lost golden chance of revange in same country with same players, they can easily arms the taliban against usa

Well, I completely agree with you
 
. .
US literally prints Global economy and countries like china, japan, india buys it. What makes you think they are going to run out of money???

let them try then...! Why are Indians trying hard to convince us?
Again! let them try what they did not try since 10 year...!
Did you ever think that why they were hesitating using such a secure route of Russia instead of using this route? :coffee:
 
.
IntelliBriefs: Northern route eases supplies to US forces in Afghanistan

Necessity is the mother of Invention!!

---------- Post added at 10:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:41 PM ----------




Why?

I wonder!

I don't think the Taliban will vacate or will they?

i dont know what sort of links you are posting.....if it was that easy then america would have went that way....either you are lying or the americans were..:lol:

you should be interested in your region that is bhutan,bangladesh,nepal.burma and maoist invasion..what do u know about politics and decision making in Central asia region where Pakistan and Afghanistan fall???
 
.
Keep repeating that and it will make it true. NATO has given Pakistan more money than its highest foreign reserves till date. Check the numbers. Add up all the money used to maintain the road infrastructure by Pakistan and it will not dent the massive aid and hard cash dolled out for WoT in Pakistan.

The problem with you guys is that you think with an Indian mindset, any issue that arises you guys are naturally programmed to bash Pakistan down. I dont blame you, its naturally in your nature but as long as you dont start thinking from a neutral perspective, you wont gain any knowledge regarding this issue.

The US has given Pakistan around $20 billion, majority of which was reimbursement for the operations that were conducted by Pakistan Army in FATA. Do you go up to your accountant and start yelling at him for the money you are going to give him for his service, off course not because thats his money not yours. Compare the $20 billion that Pakistan received from the US as compared to the damage that Pakistan's economy has suffered which was in excess of $60 billion, their is a deficit of $40 billion and majority of that $20 billion is for reimbursements. Pakistan has lost not only enormous amount of money in this WOT, but hundreds of civilians have given up their lives to this war. If you cant get this information through your thick head, than i am afraid i cannot do anything. Start thinking from a neutral perspective, take off your Indian thinking cap and trust me it will do you loads of good.

Yes revenue, transit of billion of dollars of goods through Pakistan brings business to Pakistanis..while there are no direct transit fees for goods being transported to Afghanistan but Pakistan's common man ie truckers do earn a lot from it and the taxes they pay(though unlikely) goes to your govt.

Besides US has directly paid Pakistan in excess of $21 billion since the start of WOT...that money can be used to build those roads.

Read what i wrote to Ramu, that should answer all your concerns.
 
. .
Not an unexpected development. I will just re-iterate what I posted on another thread in this forum:
There will be no American or Western departure from the region. Just that the presence will take different forms and complexions at different times.
And there is going to be a rejig in relationships and activities among the nations bordering Afghanistan (on all sides) or with perceived stakes in the area. Incredible as it may seem, even Russia and other CARS will create different kinds of 'working arrangements' with Western powers to ensure stabilisation of Afghanistan. The days of one (or two players) calling the shots in Afghanistan are over.

There will be more of the same happening. As far as China is concerned, China will make no serious efforts to upset these developments.
Since China definitely does not look forward to USA assuming a predominant role in Afghanistan, she will tacitly accept these developments. After all China does not want an indefinitely incendiary Afghanistan in her neighbourhood.

And contrary to what some of our "exceptionally optimistic colleagues" on this forum would like to believe; China will not (probably even cannot ;)) arm-twist or cajole Russia out of these "working arrangements". That is the reality---just watch this space!
 
.
The problem with you guys is that you think with an Indian mindset, any issue that arises you guys are naturally programmed to bash Pakistan down. I dont blame you, its naturally in your nature but as long as you dont start thinking from a neutral perspective, you wont gain any knowledge regarding this issue.

The US has given Pakistan around $20 billion, majority of which was reimbursement for the operations that were conducted by Pakistan Army in FATA. Do you go up to your accountant and start yelling at him for the money you are going to give him for his service, off course not because thats his money not yours. Compare the $20 billion that Pakistan received from the US as compared to the damage that Pakistan's economy has suffered which was in excess of $60 billion, their is a deficit of $40 billion and majority of that $20 billion is for reimbursements. Pakistan has lost not only enormous amount of money in this WOT, but hundreds of civilians have given up their lives to this war. If you cant get this information through your thick head, than i am afraid i cannot do anything. Start thinking from a neutral perspective, take off your Indian thinking cap and trust me it will do you loads of good.



Read what i wrote to Ramu, that should answer all your concerns.

But none of Pakistan's efforts have been towards anything in Afghanistan. All COIN Ops have been against terrorists on Pakistani soil. Kinda makes it your responsibility to get rid of them at your own cost. Isnt it? So the whole 60 billion (or whatever) is Pakistan's problem. US just forced you to own up to what you were supposed to do any way...
 
.
Changing the supply route is not as easy as it sounds from some of the posts in this thread. If it was that easy US and NATO would have done it ages ago.

1. There is a cost issue. Supply from Pakistan is a lot cheaper than other sites.

2. Any country that US / NATO will ask for a new supply route will bargain very hard at this stage of war. They will clearly know that US / NATO are in trouble and will be able offer anything. This in itself will increase the cost and will make US / NATO more vulnerable.

3. The stability and security of the areas where the new supply will route will open will be a big concern for US / NATO. They cannot afford a supply line from an area that is political hot bed OR close an enemy territory.

4. The supply routes (just like in Pakistan) can create problems in the respective area with time. If such a scenario occurs then it will create a major headache.

Therefore, I don't think that US / NATO have any better option than Pakistan.
 
.
Hey sailor man,

that's actually a fair and pretty realistic assesment. Well stated.
 
.
russia is shameless coward country, there respect was burried alongwith there shameful defeat in afghanistan, do u guys no think that thy have lost golden chance of revange in same country with same players, they can easily arms the taliban against usa

are u sure??
 
.
Back
Top Bottom