What's new

NATO In Panic Following US Pullout Plan

The economic burden of this war for NATO countries has been like buying plums at the market. The U.S. has done a lot of the heavy lifting. There is no panic and there is no "fallout" as the vacuum that ISAF will leave behind will be filled with anti-Taliban parties who will coax these guys to drop their self made costumes and become Afghan citizens.

Mark these words : This war is not over until the Fat Lady Sings.
 
well the fact that they are in negotions with the very people who were labelled as "harbourers of terrorists" seems to imply the very thing that you are mentioning

the fact of the matter is, Afghanistan (historically) has never been seen as a 'conducive' environment for foreign military occupation.
 
nobody can defeat afghanistan, look soviet union got destrpoyed because of war, and now america economy is in jeopardy, as some member told that in 10 years we will see united states in pieces, separate state of texas etc etc

afghanistan cant be invaded with any weaponry

but one thing i would like taliban to do first hand after pullout is to massacre all northern alliance traitors including major dostum and kerzai
 
The economic burden of this war for NATO countries has been like buying plums at the market. The U.S. has done a lot of the heavy lifting. There is no panic and there is no "fallout" as the vacuum that ISAF will leave behind will be filled with anti-Taliban parties who will coax these guys to drop their self made costumes and become Afghan citizens.

Mark these words : This war is not over until the Fat Lady Sings.

:lol::lol::lol:

what dont you just return the one and a half trillion dept to china beginning with and then talk abt the money you have spend and the money you have :lol::lol:
 
We don't owe China anything lol go back to your Madrassah sonny boy.

for whatever its worth mentioning:

The US Federal Deficit is always in the news - and when Chinese premier Hu Jintao arrives to a lavish reception at the White House, he comes as bigger lender to the developing world than the World Bank.

And last year, Alan Greenspan, former chairman of the Federal Reserve, said the US is pursuing a policy of weakening its currency.

In the recent past, China has defended its investment in US Treasury bonds. Meanwhile, there is concern that its position as the biggest investor in US debt may become political as well as economic.

Treasury bonds are how the US - and all governments for that matter - borrow money: they issue government securities, which other countries and institutions buy. So, the US national debt is owned predominantly by Asian economies. The US Treasury releases the figures on this

Many Eyes : Owners of US Treasury bonds, Oct 2010, $bn
 
for whatever its worth mentioning:

The US Federal Deficit is always in the news - and when Chinese premier Hu Jintao arrives to a lavish reception at the White House, he comes as bigger lender to the developing world than the World Bank.

And last year, Alan Greenspan, former chairman of the Federal Reserve, said the US is pursuing a policy of weakening its currency.

In the recent past, China has defended its investment in US Treasury bonds. Meanwhile, there is concern that its position as the biggest investor in US debt may become political as well as economic.

Treasury bonds are how the US - and all governments for that matter - borrow money: they issue government securities, which other countries and institutions buy. So, the US national debt is owned predominantly by Asian economies. The US Treasury releases the figures on this

Many Eyes : Owners of US Treasury bonds, Oct 2010, $bn

Economists will play their politics, but as far as where I am positioned to make a statement, the trade between US-Canada-Mexico has steadily grown, we see not a ripple or an iota of Chinese speculation in anyone's markets public or private. There is no Chinese dragon to be found on this continent. We are though making a good use of their cheap labour.
 
Norway terrorist attack could potentially break Europe down into fear more....
 
well the fact that they are in negotions with the very people who were labelled as "harbourers of terrorists" seems to imply the very thing that you are mentioning

the fact of the matter is, Afghanistan (historically) has never been seen as a 'conducive' environment for foreign military occupation.

Total plus...NATO historically are more weak fighters than US, Russia or the Romans or the other Asian countries fighting force.

Its more bark than the bite from NATO Europeans.
 
USA and its whack a mole policy... how many moles can they whack before they run themselves out of money? :rolleyes:
 
for whatever its worth mentioning:

The US Federal Deficit is always in the news - and when Chinese premier Hu Jintao arrives to a lavish reception at the White House, he comes as bigger lender to the developing world than the World Bank.

And last year, Alan Greenspan, former chairman of the Federal Reserve, said the US is pursuing a policy of weakening its currency.

In the recent past, China has defended its investment in US Treasury bonds. Meanwhile, there is concern that its position as the biggest investor in US debt may become political as well as economic.

Treasury bonds are how the US - and all governments for that matter - borrow money: they issue government securities, which other countries and institutions buy. So, the US national debt is owned predominantly by Asian economies. The US Treasury releases the figures on this

Many Eyes : Owners of US Treasury bonds, Oct 2010, $bn

The bolded statement is WRONG:

from: Who owns America? Hint: It's not China – Global Public Square - CNN.com Blogs

Who owns America? Hint: It's not China

Editor's Note: The following piece comes from Global Post, which provides excellent coverage of world news - important, moving and odd.

By Tom Mucha, Global Post

Truth is elusive. But it's a good thing we have math.

Our friends at Business Insider know this, and put those two principles to work today in this excellent and highly informative little slideshow, made even more timely by the ongoing talks in Washington, D.C. aimed at staving off a U.S. debt default.

Here's the big idea:

Many people — politicians and pundits alike — prattle on that China and, to a lesser extent Japan, own most of America's $14.3 trillion in government debt.

But there's one little problem with that conventional wisdom: it's just not true. While the Chinese, Japanese and plenty of other foreigners own substantial amounts, it's really Americans who hold most of America's debt.


Here's a quick and fascinating breakdown by total amount held and percentage of total U.S. debt, according to Business Insider:



Hong Kong: $121.9 billion (0.9 percent)
Caribbean banking centers: $148.3 (1 percent)
Taiwan: $153.4 billion (1.1 percent)
Brazil: $211.4 billion (1.5 percent)
Oil exporting countries: $229.8 billion (1.6 percent)
Mutual funds: $300.5 billion (2 percent)
Commercial banks: $301.8 billion (2.1 percent)
State, local and federal retirement funds: $320.9 billion (2.2 percent)
Money market mutual funds: $337.7 billion (2.4 percent)
United Kingdom: $346.5 billion (2.4 percent)
Private pension funds: $504.7 billion (3.5 percent)
State and local governments: $506.1 billion (3.5 percent)
Japan: $912.4 billion (6.4 percent)
U.S. households: $959.4 billion (6.6 percent)
China: $1.16 trillion (8 percent)
The U.S. Treasury: $1.63 trillion (11.3 percent)
Social Security trust fund: $2.67 trillion (19 percent)

So America owes foreigners about $4.5 trillion in debt. But America owes America $9.8 trillion.
 
you guys only are happy about US withdrawal from Afganistan.....you never think of the after effect of what will come if US leaves.....Taliban would probably take back in Afganistan...then? Pakistan is its nearest neighbor who helped the US.....you can put rest of the pieces in place...
 
Their aim of stopping terrorists from attacking US and disbanding terror groups succeeded .
They won

@ Definitely they won like the Indian Peace Keepers Won in Sri Lanka !!!!!!!!!!!!!

---------- Post added at 05:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:13 PM ----------

you guys only are happy about US withdrawal from Afganistan.....you never think of the after effect of what will come if US leaves.....Taliban would probably take back in Afganistan...then? Pakistan is its nearest neighbor who helped the US.....you can put rest of the pieces in place...

@ No !!! You are wrong, now they will hunt towards Kashmir first. Wake up Indian !!!!
 
The European financial turmoil will add to NATO's worries infact the financial turmoil in the euro zone triggered by a potential debt default by Greece could have a domino effect world wide.
 
Back
Top Bottom