What's new

Myanmar economy losing momentum, IMF warns

Lol since when Myanmar had a civilian government? Your country is ruled by the army. Myanmar is still a quasi military state if not a completely military run state

of course ..!! now civilian gov hold the power and control most of the seats in parliament. They can change policies of country whatever they want without needing any support from army. All of the state ministers , regional prime ministers who made the decisions are civilians. They are named as a quasi military state just due to army controlling 25 % seats in parliament. But gov actually dont need support army's 25% seats in every cases as we used voting system. So technically , civilian gov control enough power to make developments of the country with or without support of army. All of the army need to do is concentration on weapons and wars. the gov will care the developments of the country.
 
of course ..!! now civilian gov hold the power and control most of the seats in parliament. They can change policies of country whatever they want without needing any support from army. All of the state ministers , regional prime ministers who made the decisions are civilians. They are named as a quasi military state just due to army controlling 25 % seats in parliament. But gov actually dont need support army's 25% seats in every cases as we used voting system. So technically , civilian gov control enough power to make developments of the country with or without support of army. All of the army need to do is concentration on weapons and wars. the gov will care the developments of the country.
I dont think MM people deserve anything better.
 
of course ..!! now civilian gov hold the power and control most of the seats in parliament. They can change policies of country whatever they want without needing any support from army. All of the state ministers , regional prime ministers who made the decisions are civilians. They are named as a quasi military state just due to army controlling 25 % seats in parliament. But gov actually dont need support army's 25% seats in every cases as we used voting system. So technically , civilian gov control enough power to make developments of the country with or without support of army. All of the army need to do is concentration on weapons and wars. the gov will care the developments of the country.


Which country has army that holds seats in government,apart from Myanmar, and the defence minister is serving in the army?

o_O:welcome::rofl:
 
Which country has army that holds seats in government,apart from Myanmar, and the defence minister is serving in the army?

o_O:welcome::rofl:

Those 25% and 75% seats are just for show. The army calls all the shots in that country. Burmese are highly uncivilized and xenophobic people, that's the only type of government that suits them. This country is another North Korea in the making as I said before.
 
Those 25% and 75% seats are just for show. The army calls all the shots in that country. Burmese are highly uncivilized and xenophobic people, that's the only type of government that suits them. This country is another North Korea in the making as I said before.
so on what do you base these claims
 
Listen, Myanmar was never a banana state considering the resources it has however 95% of the money goes into the pockets of the stupid army. The Burmese military is the biggest obstacle for which the country is not developing. The army is more interested in buying weapons and waging wars rather than developing the economy and infrastructure. Myanmar needs to be a democratic state with Buddhism as state religion to prosper.
95 % thats a huge amount :o::o:

Not even in Pakistan where the military has been entrenched in our psyche politics and everything even they dont hold that much power

what do you think is the solution because the world is moving toward right wing populism and if the Myanmar military holds that much power over the state i dont see anything changing until something dramatic happens

your thoughts?
 
95 % thats a huge amount :o::o:

Not even in Pakistan where the military has been entrenched in our psyche politics and everything even they dont hold that much power

what do you think is the solution because the world is moving toward right wing populism and if the Myanmar military holds that much power over the state i dont see anything changing until something dramatic happens

your thoughts?
Pakistan is not a direct military state but the military has influence in the politics of Pakistan. It is still a democracy ruled by a Prime minister and President. Myanmar is a absolute military dictatorship although the Burmese claim that Myanmar is now a quasi military nation.
 
Pakistan is not a direct military state but the military has influence in the politics of Pakistan. It is still a democracy ruled by a Prime minister and President. Myanmar is a absolute military dictatorship although the Burmese claim that Myanmar is now a quasi military nation.
do you think Myanmar will become a quasi North Korea like you mention?
 
do you think Myanmar will become a quasi North Korea like you mention?
There is a higher chance. The Burmese military rulers have always idolized North Korea and their characteristics are also quite similar to that of North Korea. Both are extremely poor, both are rogue nations who are oppressing others, both are isolated and highly secretive nations with less freedom of speech and both are Allies of China.

People may find it funny but the Myanmar military may become another Nuclear armed rogue nation just like North Korea. I know it's surprising considering the fact that Myanmar is a poor nation however since 2006 there were many reports that Myanmar is trying to build nuclear weapons with the help of North Korea and Russia however there are still doubts regarding how far the program went, even if it exists. In 2007 an American or South korean naval patrol team encountered a North Korean Ship who was delivering nuclear consignments to Myanmar.

I'm stating the possibilities because Myanmar army is very very very much a secretive army.Recently the army officials arrested two journalists who reported the whereabouts of a chemical weapons factory in Myanmar. The Myanmar army arrests anyone who tries to leak out any information regarding the army. Even there government websites are highly restrictive.

I don't think Myanmar has the capability to make nuclear weapons for themselves because Myanmar is a extremely poor nation however the army is a rogue one with sinister motives and also they restrict a lot of military information, so I believe they maybe, maybe upto something dangerous. Well in the future we will find out
 
There is a higher chance. The Burmese military rulers have always idolized North Korea and their characteristics are also quite similar to that of North Korea. Both are extremely poor, both are rogue nations who are oppressing others, both are isolated and highly secretive nations with less freedom of speech and both are Allies of China.

People may find it funny but the Myanmar military may become another Nuclear armed rogue nation just like North Korea. I know it's surprising considering the fact that Myanmar is a poor nation however since 2006 there were many reports that Myanmar is trying to build nuclear weapons with the help of North Korea and Russia however there are still doubts regarding how far the program went, even if it exists. In 2007 an American or South korean naval patrol team encountered a North Korean Ship who was delivering nuclear consignments to Myanmar.

I'm stating the possibilities because Myanmar army is very very very much a secretive army.Recently the army officials arrested two journalists who reported the whereabouts of a chemical weapons factory in Myanmar. The Myanmar army arrests anyone who tries to leak out any information regarding the army. Even there government websites are highly restrictive.

I don't think Myanmar has the capability to make nuclear weapons for themselves because Myanmar is a extremely poor nation however the army is a rogue one with sinister motives and also they restrict a lot of military information, so I believe they maybe, maybe upto something dangerous. Well in the future we will find out
That was really insightful and eye opening

thankx :tup:
 
95 % thats a huge amount :o::o:

Not even in Pakistan where the military has been entrenched in our psyche politics and everything even they dont hold that much power

what do you think is the solution because the world is moving toward right wing populism and if the Myanmar military holds that much power over the state i dont see anything changing until something dramatic happens

your thoughts?
how can it become..? if 95% of income goes to army , how can we operate and manage our country.. Moreover , he is not even a burmese. he is talking non-sense based on his clueless claim.

Pakistan is not a direct military state but the military has influence in the politics of Pakistan. It is still a democracy ruled by a Prime minister and President. Myanmar is a absolute military dictatorship although the Burmese claim that Myanmar is now a quasi military nation.

completely non-sense. Civilian Gov led by Daw Aung San Su kyi is holding decent seats in parliament and control enough power except military affairs. Military dictatorship is already over. She also controlled enough power to assign and fire all state minister and herself is minister of foreign affair.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_of_the_Union

Please correct ur flag and dont be pretending like a burmese who know everything inside Myanmar. U already admitted it in some previous posts.
 
Myanmar economy losing momentum, IMF warns
THOMPSON CHAU 21 APR 2019

https://www.mmtimes.com/news/myanmar-economy-losing-momentum-imf-warns.html


myanmar-economy-losing-momentum-imf-warns-01.jpg

The IMF warns that failure to address the northern Rakhine crisis or the refugee repatriation process would hurt Myanmar economically. Photo: Thiri Lu/ The Myanmar Times



The International Monetary Fund has warned that the Myanmar economy “appears to be losing momentum”, citing concerns over fallout from the Rakhine crisis and weaknesses in the banking sector.

The IMF said “risks are tilted to the downside” and that failure to address the humanitarian catastrophe or the refugee repatriation process would hurt the country economically.

“A prolonged humanitarian crisis and any withdrawal of trade preferences could reduce concessional donor financing and investment leading to lower growth,” it said. The European Union is considering initiating a withdrawal process of the trade privileges it has offered Myanmar, owing to the human rights violations in northern Rakhine.

The fragility of the banks presents another risk, the IMF added. Macrofinancial spillovers from the ongoing banking sector restructuring process may become more severe if banks delay recapitalisation. There is a need to improve compliance and loss recognition.

Headline inflation was moderate in 2017-18, with 4.0 percent on average, but has been rising from increased fuel prices and a depreciating kyat. The kyat has depreciated 14.5pc since April 2018.

The IMF expects economic growth of 6.4pc in the fiscal year 2018-19 (October 2018 to September 2019) if government spending picks up. This compares with 6.8pc in 2017-18 (April 2017 to March 2018) and an annualised 6.2pc in the six months to September 2018.

imf-graph-page-09.png
imf-graph-page-09.png

Graph: IMF Country Report published in April 2019.



Despite favourable long-term prospects, growth is estimated to “remain below potential” this year due to weakening export demand and subdued private construction activity. It is forecasted to pick up in the medium term (6.6pc in 2019-20 and 6.7pc in 2020-21), albeit at a slower pace than previously envisaged. The growth trajectory is subject to downside risks related to Rakhine. External uncertainties include trade tensions, high crude oil prices and spillovers from exposure to China.

The predictions came in the Fund’s latest annual assessment of the Myanmar economy.

A prolonged humanitarian crisis and any withdrawal of trade preferences could reduce concessional donor financing and investment leading to lower growth. - IMF

Daw Aung San Suu Kyi’s economic adviser Sean Turnell said the IMF’s concerns about risks regarding Rakhine are valid, and “relate not just to the internal effects of such crises, but also those that might come from counter-productive international responses to them."

On the issue of banking sector fragility, he emphasised that the risks are about legacy structural issues surrounding the banks bequeathed to the current administration and reform is “well underway”.

“For the first time Myanmar now has a government that is indeed serious about such a fundamental safeguard as the prudential regulation of banks, and to which banks are now gradually adhering to.

“Of course, as in so many areas, it’s going to take time to clear up these legacy problems in banking, and the whole process is not without its challenges,” the adviser told The Myanmar Times.

Economic slowdown is “very much a global story” and the IMF’s estimates that Myanmar's growth will be well above global norms and as fast as China’s.

Dr Turnell said the government's “strong” economic management “shines out” in the report and that its fiscal prudence would permit a mild stimulus under the Myanmar Sustainable Development Plan (MSDP).

Successful implementation of MSDP’s second wave of reforms, according to the Fund, will help sustain growth.

“The IMF notes the extraordinarily modest, by historical standards, fiscal deficit in Myanmar - just 2.7pc in 2017-18, compared to the decade-average in excess of 5pc - as well as the great success of the government in reducing recourse to central bank financing.”

The Fund acknowledged the recent moves to a genuinely market-determined reference exchange rate, partial liberalisation of interest rates, and improvements in data collection and dissemination. Dr Turnell said in these areas the administration “is in complete agreement” regarding the need for further progress.

The IMF warning comes as the ruling National League for Democracy party concluded their third year in office. Approved FDI between October 2017 and September 2018 has fallen to the lowest since 2014. The authorities passed a slew of new laws intended to improve the business environment, but poor implementation has put off investors.



imf-graph-page-10.png
imf-graph-page-10.png

Graph: IMF Country Report published in April 2019.

‘Changing perceptions’

Changing perceptions of country risk rather than the speed of reform has led to slowing momentum, commented Adam McCarty, chief economist with Mekong Economics.

Country risk has increased due to Rakhine and the inability of the authorities and the legal system to stop established local business cartels from controlling markets and stopping competition.

Reforms, at least on paper, are probably moving about as fast as we might reasonably expect, given government capacity constraints and political considerations. - Adam McCarty, Mekong Economics

“Reforms, at least on paper, are probably moving about as fast as we might reasonably expect, given government capacity constraints and political considerations,” the economist went on.

Recent developments suggest a pick-up in the pace of change, such as the creation of the Ministry of Investment and Foreign Economic Relations. Five foreign life insurers were granted provisional licences after two years of delay while Japanese and Swiss traders were given a greenlight to do retail and wholesale activities. The government also announced a “project bank” to determine how infrastructure programmes are planned and funded.

To regain the momentum, Dr McCarty suggested Nay Pyi Taw to invest in human capital, stop worrying about debt and “borrow every possible dollar at concessional rates”. “Those rates will only be there for 10-15 years, and disbursements rates on projects are very low anyway. It is time to spend, not save.”

In addition, Myanmar needs a well-funded competition and productivity authority to focus on domestic price competitiveness, as the economy “is riddled with excessive costs and anti-competitive practices.”

The Asian Development Bank , which predicts the country to grow by 6.6pc over this fiscal year, also warned that slow progress in implementing reform and withdrawal of trade privileges remains a risk.



imf-graph-page-13.png
imf-graph-page-13.png

They still have fellow racists and Islamophobia in India and SL to support them.

India will become their new godfather. I am sure of it.

They worked together to fight Muslims in SL.
 
They still have fellow racists and Islamophobia in India and SL to support them.

India will become their new godfather. I am sure of it.

They worked together to fight Muslims in SL.
Myanmar is not an anti Muslim country. They hate the rohingyas because they believe they are of Bengali descent. Myanmar army is fighting even Buddhists and Christian insurgents like Karen, Rakhine, Kachin, Shan etc. But yes, the Burmese always used Nazi style approach on rohingyas because the Burmese hates bengalis more than anyone else.
 
how can it become..? if 95% of income goes to army , how can we operate and manage our country.. Moreover , he is not even a burmese. he is talking non-sense based on his clueless claim.



completely non-sense. Civilian Gov led by Daw Aung San Su kyi is holding decent seats in parliament and control enough power except military affairs. Military dictatorship is already over. She also controlled enough power to assign and fire all state minister and herself is minister of foreign affair.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_of_the_Union

Please correct ur flag and dont be pretending like a burmese who know everything inside Myanmar. U already admitted it in some previous posts.
The home minister, defence minister and many other ministry is still run by the military and you are telling me that Myanmar is not a quasi military state?
 
The home minister, defence minister and many other ministry is still run by the military and you are telling me that Myanmar is not a quasi military state?
Moreover military can dissolve civilian government in case if they want whereas civilian government cant fire Army chief neither appoint him. So you know who runs the country. Military just outsourced some civilian jobs to Su Kyi's party to get out of sanction nothing else.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom