Wrong, its Republic of India or Bharat Ganrajya. Here's Wikipedia for you:
In ancient times, South Asia wasn't united regardless of the name so your point is moot. Its not the same entity.
I just said that.
Genius, Sindh, again, is a province of Pakistan along with the River Indus.
Persians took the word "Hind" from Arabs who called the region "al-Hind". And its not called that for convenience sake, its because
THEY KEPT WRITTEN RECORDS on Sindh which superseded the verbal history of the region. You're now officially a clown.
What the hell are you talking about? Hindustan and India don't have common origins. One is Greek (India), the other is Arabic / Persian (Hindustan). We just discussed that!
Make it official, don't shame one billion "Indians" who are named after a conquest or a river in Pakistan.
We separated from British India, not India. British India didn't belong to "Indians", you were merely slaves in it. And we changed the name because we have a perspective on history which you obviously don't considering you still ignorantly label yourself "Indian".
There is no North/South or East/West Yemen. EPIC FAIL.
Above all, do you have any idea of what a "Nation-State" is? Do tell what is America, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, if not a bunch of British renegades. And I'm not even going touch South America or Africa, like South Africa is the name of a "tribe".
First, let me breakdown India and its "heritage" for you.
a. India = Named after a river in Pakistan and conquests/defeats from Alexander and Brits.
b. Hindu = Persian word for Sindhu people who are happily living in the Sindh province of Pakistan. And whose identity and honor was revived by Jinnah who demanded that Sindh be separated from Bombay Presidency.
c. Hinduism = English word invented British in 17th century like any sort of "ism" can possibly a Sanskrit word.
d. Hindu "culture" is a derivative of a Sindhi civilization, Indus Valley Civilization, which predates Hinduism. And I'm not even going to get into Mehrgar civilization and Rawat where the earliest evidence of "Out of Africa" theory in South Asia are found.
So what exactly is yours? It's all Pakistan's heritage. The word "India" is meaningless whereas the word
PAKISTAN represents the people of Pakistan. P for Punjabis and Pashtuns, K for Kashmiris, S for Sindhis and "stan" from Baluchistan. Ergo, its "India" that is the definition of fake and artificial state.
Professor, its British history that the world is following and you so slavishly are parroting. Where is the sense of your own history when you take pride in labeling yourself "Indian"?
Let's not get into genetics. Pakistan has a very different genetic makeup than India. We fall primarily into ANI (Ancestral North Indian) while India is dominated by ASI (Ancestral South Indian).
Now stop embarrassing yourself and stick to the topic of Myanmar military.