Muslims won't give up Babri Masjid : Razakars

[Yeti]

And if there's no statue of Jesus in Church, will he (Jesus) not listen to the prayers offered by Christians?

That is the point I was making it does not matter if there is idol of Jesus or not as you can meditate to Jesus

 

[A1Kaid]

Our scriptures say Lord Ram existed and was born in Ayodhya.

It's just folklore there was never a Lord Ram, and no scientific evidence of one exist. Any traces of Lord Ram considering your scriptures say Lord Ram was "born" as a physical birth, any traces of his life on Earth? No, just ancient folklore and mythology ignorant people still believe in. You only believe in Lord Ram because one your ignorant and two you were born to Hindu Indian parents, so your believe in Lord Ram is just by chance not by legitimacy or actual substance of belief. Had you been born in Africa you would have believed in a African God or some other tribal God, had you been born in Japan you would believe in Shinto or something.

 

[KingMamba]

And I'm supposed to believe you on that. Considering the fact we know for a fact how "Islam" dealt with the pagan religions in its path.

Yes we all know Hindus like to claim they know about Islam more than Muslims themselves. Oh yes the big bad Muslims did a genocide on Hindus. On top of that the hindus will say Islam only spreads due to birthrate but then do not realize that somehow there are 1 Billion Hindus running around this planet despite the Muslim genocide, despite the near zero conversion rate of Hinduism. So which was it again did the evil Muslims just do a horrible job at genocide of pagan religions or do you guys have a higher birthrate than you let on yet accuse Muslims of spreading like rabbits??? A humble question by an evil Muslim.

 

[Zabaniyah]

Err..well...it matters. It will matter as much mecca or medina will matter to you for all time to come.

Gee...I didn't know Ayodha was a pilgrimage for Muslims (it isn't )

 

[A.Rafay]

Our scriptures say Lord Ram existed and was born in Ayodhya.

Look for another place for him in ayodah or whatever just dont destroy the babri mosque saying there was a temple before and all mosques were built on temples LOL Your logic is flawwed

 

[KS]

It's just folklore there was never a Lord Ram, and no scientific evidence of one exist.

There is no scientic proof for Allah or Abraham or Moses or Noah.

 

[Kompromat]

The black stone is a pagan object kissing it does not make it pagan the actual stone is pagan

Its a relic protected by Abrahmic faiths for thousands of years. Worship makes stuff Pagan, its kissed out of respect for what it represents not for being a stone.

 

[Yeti]

The word idol is Abrahmaic it does not exist in Dharmic religions it is a alien word used in the bible and quran it means nothing in respect to Hinduism

Its a relic protected by Abrahmic faiths for thousands of years. Worship makes stuff Pagan, its kissed out of respect for what it represents not for being a stone.

The stone was a pagan object you can google it

 

[A1Kaid]

Or you hate people who you think are pagans..thats what your problem is...



There are millions out there who give a crap mate. And why not ? When has the desire to see a mandir on top of one of Hindusm's most sacred place be considered a circus ?

You're just a hate-filled Hindu, always hating on Muslims probably never even had a Muslim friend, typical fanatical Hindu who hates Muslims because he was bred that way. No wonder you support demolition of Babri Masjid.

 

[KS]

Look for another place for him in ayodah or whatever just dont destroy the babri mosque saying there was a temple before and all mosques were built on temples LOL Your logic is flawwed

That the mosque was built upon a temple has been proved by Archaelogists with the help of latest techniques and dated to more than 500 years before.

 

[Kompromat]

There is no scientic proof for Allah or Abraham or Moses or Noah.

Gravestone of Abraham/ unlike this Ram can be refuted as a myth because no one even knows when he was born or where he was buried.

Bring more ignorance..

 

[KingMamba]

The black stone in Kabba is a pagan object google it

I do not need to Google to learn about my religion. Yeti maybe you should educate your fellow Hindus on this forum some of them claim worshiping idol is a part of Hinduism and it is not what you claim to be here.

 

[A1Kaid]

There is no scientic proof for Allah or Abraham or Moses or Noah.

There is scientific evidence for the Prophets, but not for the millions of Hindu gods you believe in yet you continue to worship them. As for Islam, Islam had Prophets and scriptures so people rely on that physical evidence to believe in.

Men like Noah, Muhammad, Jesus, Abhraham are all historical and real figures not make believe. Their lives were records in the annals of history, we know where they were born, who they married, what they did, where they lived, who they met, all were real actual men.

Unlike Hindus, believing in talking elephants and monkeys...yeah that's believable.

 

[SQ8]

That is a hypothesis. Understand the difference between a hypothesis and a fact. And anyway IVC was not in Arabia..anything east of hindukush was considered a part of traditional Bharat.




Where do you think Jainism evolved from...and lol Jains are some of the most devout worshippers of Lord Hanuman as far as I have seen.

Sikhism originated in the lands that comprise Bharat. Not in the Semitic lands. Hence it will always be Indic in nature.



Because that book systematically and with proof demolishes the myth of Budddhist persection in the hands of the Hindus and explains the political motivation behind those cooked up stories being spread by few "eminent" historians.

By your hypothesis India was also never part of Gondwanaland and hence was always a separate entity from the world.

The fact that Hinduism owes its origins to Indo-Iranian religions which owe some of their concepts to the Middle east and European beliefs would Make Hinduism alien as well.
Jainism.. has many things in common with the IVC as compared to mainstream Hinduism.. hence the idea.. of it being more Indian

And you just being defensive on sikhism..

As for your book..
I had a feeling that the eminent historians pun was going to be Muslims.. and voila ..its there.
The author has made it clear in his premise that he wishes to ATTACK MUSLIM HISTORIANS.. and them alone..
right... should I read further?

It ok, you hate Muslims.. you find excuses to brand them alien, brand them outcasts.. perhaps one day encourage some cleansing.

 

[Kompromat]

That the mosque was built upon a temple has been proved by Archaelogists with the help of latest techniques and dated to more than 500 years before.

BS, it was demolished because Hindu hardliners "believed" that the Ram was born here which has no record.