Muslim appeasement | Modi Govt to repair riot damaged Mosques

[Ayush]

30% of Modi's voters in recently held state elections were Muslims... the Bohri community.

This is before he was named the candidate for PM unofficially.

Oh and BTW the Bodri community are very open minded and cool people, only next to ismaili muslims.

Unlike your groups who pander to Arabia, these guys are actually proud Indians.

very true.. two of my best friends are bohri muslims..

 

[livingdead]

its a good initiative.. modi should have done it earlier..

 

[Echo_419]

Don't care just do whatever it takes to win 2014
My hope rests on Mr MODI

 

[eastwatch]

Most posters here are in the illusion with Modi, the muscleman and propagandist politician from Gujarat. My own sentiment is with Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen. He is against Modi because a communal-minded man like him is unfit to be the PM of India.

What he is promising to become in the future is not the yardstick. Yardstick is what he did in the past when violent Hindu mobs went rampage and killed thousands of innocent and unarmed Muslims. Modi's Police or his party men did not come out to help the innocents out.

Since Modi remains a social outcaste in the minds of many of India's citizens, therefore, he will only bring shame to the country. Gujarat riot will keep on hunting him. Modi is only feared and not respected by the people. People want a Bajpayee like man in the center with education and humility. Modi is too upstart.

 

[Thorough Pro]

Ethically and morally a state is also not supposed to destroy places of worship of minorities, and if does, it is legally bound to repay complete expenses for restoration/renovation of such places. Now take your Technical bull crap some to some other bull **** place, like india

Technically a state is indeed not responsible for repairing religious structures but if the damage is on a large scale where it becomes impossible for individuals or organisations to do the work alone then the state should intervene, flexibility in exigent circumstances is called for. But then cooperation from WAKF would be appreciated given the exemptions given to them.

 

[Dillinger]

Ethically and morally a state is also not supposed to destroy places of worship of minorities, and if does, it is legally bound to repay complete expenses for restoration/renovation of such places. Now take your Technical bull crap some to some other bull **** place, like india

The state didn't destroy any places of worship. Even under an exigent circumstance where you may allege that functionaries of the state were involved in any such actions even then that does not constitute the involvement of the Indian State itself in any such action. As sated many times before, an inability to grasp these clearly defined legalities will only lead to an indulgence in logical fallacies.

Furthermore, note the addendum to the line highlighted by you- "but if the damage is on a large scale where it becomes impossible for individuals or organisations to do the work alone then the state should intervene, flexibility in exigent circumstances is called for." If you are incapable of grasping context as much as you are unable to grasp nuance then not much can be said on the subject beyond this point.

Lastly, the state has no obligation under any existing legislature to repair temples, mosques, churches etc. Inability to understand that religion and your sentiments are of little importance in the scheme of things will lead to people engaging in logorrhoea.

 

[Tshering22]

The state didn't destroy any places of worship. Even under an exigent circumstance where you may allege that functionaries of the state were involved in any such actions even then that does not constitute the involvement of the Indian State itself in any such action. As sated many times before, an inability to grasp these clearly defined legalities will only lead to an indulgence in logical fallacies.

Furthermore, note the addendum to the line highlighted by you- "but if the damage is on a large scale where it becomes impossible for individuals or organisations to do the work alone then the state should intervene, flexibility in exigent circumstances is called for." If you are incapable of grasping context as much as you are unable to grasp nuance then not much can be said on the subject beyond this point.

Lastly, the state has no obligation under any existing legislature to repair temples, mosques, churches etc. Inability to understand that religion and your sentiments are of little importance in the scheme of things will lead to people engaging in logorrhoea.

Don't waste your time explaining to those who have left no trace of indigenous culture in their own lands and massacred and converted almost entire non-Islamic population.

 

[KS]

It was a court order that the govt had to agree to. I disagree with the decision (since the state has no business spending money on mosques), but apparently the courts dont seem to think so.

 

[bronxbull]

The numbers of the left wing can only be balanced by the iron fist of the right wing and it will be.

 

[Asskicker]

30% of Modi's voters in recently held state elections were Muslims... the Bohri community.

This is before he was named the candidate for PM unofficially.

Oh and BTW the Bodri community are very open minded and cool people, only next to ismaili muslims.

Unlike your groups who pander to Arabia, these guys are actually proud Indians.

Mate most of the votes were sold out by poors......!

 

[HariPrasad]

There are fissures within muslim community also.

Mostly it is Ahemadis and shia's who support BJP. Shia-Sunni riots are commonplace in UP. I remember there was one when Saddam Hussein was hanged.

Actually Shias, Ahemadias, Khojas and other Non sunni Muslims are more afraid of Sunnis than Hindus. They have subcontinent examples right there in front of them.

 

[SamantK]

@Spring Onion, the title is misleading.

Change it.