Mumbai Attacks

[Neo]

"India has failed to provide Mumbai report to Interpol"
Malik urges India to reply to Pak queries ​

Monday March 09, 2009

ISLAMABAD: Visiting Interpol General Secretary Richard K Noble on Sunday called on India to take the lead in investigations into the Mumbai attacks, saying Indian authorities had so far failed to provide any report to Interpol.
Addressing a press conference with Interior Adviser Rehman Malik, the secretary general said Interpol had information of paramount importance that would help Pakistan’s Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) determine the full dimensions of the Mumbai attacks.

Information: “For the first time, we have detailed information on telephone numbers, bank accounts used in terrorist financing as well as internet addresses and the equipment and materials used to perpetrate these attacks,” Noble said.

He said all of the information was being checked against Interpol’s global databases to determine what international links might exist. “For the first time, we have police information on those who planned, facilitated and funded those attacks.”

The Interpol chief said they had sent key leads and information received from Pakistan to all of Interpol’s 187 member countries so that they could better protect their citizens and provide valuable information to Pakistan.

He said Pakistan would provide Interpol the DNA profiles that Islamabad obtained during its investigation into the Mumbai attacks. “The profiles will be compared against the world’s only global DNA database containing more than 83,000 DNA profiles,” he said. “In order for these comparisons to be complete India will be required to send Interpol the DNA profiles that they obtained in their investigation.”

He said Pakistani authorities’ cooperation following the Mumbai attacks had been nothing short of extraordinary, adding Islamabad had shown integrity by publicly admitting that the Mumbai attacks had been partly planned in the country.

Noble said seven countries, including India and some European states, were used for perpetrating the attacks.

The Interpol chief said Pakistan and its people were hit the worst by terrorism and the world stood with them in the war on terror.

Commenting on the Lahore terror attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team, he said it had some similarity with the Mumbai attacks, but nothing could be ascertained until he discussed the matter with the local officials.

Earlier, Interior Adviser Rehman Malik urged India to reply to 30 questions by Pakistan relating to the Mumbai attacks at the earliest.

The adviser said only 13 days were left of the remand of the Mumbai attacks’ accused held in Pakistan, adding that Pakistan was awaiting India’s response.

“Indian authorities should share the information details asked by Pakistan regarding the progress into the probe,” Malik said. “India should provide

 

[Omar1984]

India not want Pakistan to get insight into its intelligence through Interpol

2009-03-09

NEW DELHI, March 9 (Xinhua) -- India is reluctant to provide further evidence to Interpol on Mumbai terror attacks fearing it might result in Pakistan gaining insight into its intelligence operations, a senior government official said on Monday.

"India doesn't want Pakistan to gain knowledge of its intelligence operations," the official said, on condition of anonymity.

India has already shared evidence of the Mumbai terror attacks last November with the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) through a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty with the United States.

"The country is not bound to share any information on the attacks to Interpol until it feels necessary," the official said.

Pakistan has reportedly rejected an offer of assistance from the FBI.

Interpol officials have praised Pakistan's efforts to find the plotters but chided India for not sharing the information with them.

"India has shared information with the FBI, they have kept Interpol largely out of the loop. So far, we have received no information from the government of India or any (Indian) police organization," Interpol official Noble told the media Sunday in Islamabad.

The France-based international police organization has also announced an agreement with Pakistan to aid an investigation into the masterminds behind the Mumbai attacks.

Islamabad has admitted that part of the Mumbai terr plot was hatched on Pakistani soil, but called on India to provide more information about the attacks.

Pakistan has also pledged to provide Interpol with DNA evidence that was recovered, which will be cross-referenced against its global database of 83,000 DNA profiles.

Local news media reported that the evidence included samples from relatives of various Pakistani suspects, including of Ajmal Amir Kasab, the only suspected assailant in custody.

But Noble had said that "in order for these comparisons to be completed, India will be required to send Interpol the DNA profiles that they obtained in their investigation."


India not want Pakistan to get insight into its intelligence through Interpol_English_Xinhua

 

[Neo]

India should make up its mind!​

The Interior Adviser Mr Rehman Malik has been endorsed by the visiting Interpol General Secretary Richard K Noble when he called on India to “take the lead in investigations into the Mumbai attacks”. Mr Malik’s complaint was that the Indian authorities had so far failed to provide any report on the attacks to Interpol. What was highlighted in fact was India’s reluctance to answer the 30 questions posed by Pakistan in consequence of its investigation of the “dossier’ received from India.

Mr Malik deserves credit for treating the Indian “dossier” in a speedy and efficient manner, objectively and without the knee-jerk reaction of denial. In a similar situation, most Pakistani officials would have thought it “safe” to aggressively deny the charges made by India, as if the truth was disputed between just India and Pakistan. But Mr Malik has won the confidence of India and the international community by the way in which he has handled this matter so far. The verdict on the dossier arrived at by investigators under his charge owned up some facts known to the entire world through Pakistan’s own free media. Many in Pakistan may have been unsettled by Pakistan’s official finding that the Mumbai attacks were partly planned inside Pakistan but there is no escaping this fact and Mr Malik has done the right and proper thing by coming clean.

Mr Malik’s cooperative attitude should have inclined India to fuller cooperation. But it hasn’t. Thus Mr Malik has been forced to say that the persons arrested and now under police questioning might have to be released by the courts of Pakistan. He said: “Only 13 days were left of the remand of the Mumbai attacks’ accused held in Pakistan. The Indian authorities should share the information details asked for by Pakistan [in the form of 30 questions] regarding the progress into the probe”. He was supported by the Interpol chief in an indirect way.

Mr Noble said: “For the first time, we have detailed information on telephone numbers, bank accounts used in terrorist financing as well as internet addresses and the equipment and materials used to perpetrate these attacks. For the first time, we have police information on those who planned, facilitated and funded those attacks”. He said the data provided by Pakistan is being compared to databases around the world and, “in order for these comparisons to be complete, India will be required to send Interpol the DNA profiles that they obtained in their investigation”.

Why should India hesitate to share information with Pakistan and Interpol? The fact that Pakistan decided to come out of denial was a kind of Indian victory. Why is India reluctant to follow up on this positive achievement? It may not want to be seen as being too friendly to Pakistan because the government in power may want to grab the Indian “hate vote” in the April-May general elections. But what is the downside to sharing information that is supposed to be damning only to elements in Pakistan? The withholding of information only puts the world community on notice about India’s unwillingness to cooperate.

The time India is taking over the thirty questions is denting its credibility at the international level and causing suspicion to creep into the universal sympathy India had won after the Mumbai attacks. This suspicion will sooner rather than later cause reaction inside Pakistan too, resurrecting the charges made earlier about India stage-managing the attacks to put Pakistan under pressure. Who were the other eight attackers? Were they from Pakistan or were they from India or brought in from countries other than Pakistan to take part in the “operation”? More lethally, India’s refusal to share information will strengthen the hands of those who believe that Lahore’s 3/3 attack on the Sri Lankan cricketers too was orchestrated by India.

One doesn’t want to indulge in scoring points here. One must congratulate the Interior Adviser Mr Rehman Malik for doing an honest job on the Indian “dossier’ despite public hostility, and commend the government of Pakistan for its wisdom to accept his findings. This should have represented the beginning of genuine cooperation between India and Pakistan, only if India would follow through. If there was any doubt about the sincerity of the “30 questions” it has been removed by the Interpol chief on Sunday. India should make up its mind quickly.

 

[gaurysh]

"India has failed to provide Mumbai report to Interpol"
Malik urges India to reply to Pak queries ​

Monday March 09, 2009

ISLAMABAD: Visiting Interpol General Secretary Richard K Noble on Sunday called on India to take the lead in investigations into the Mumbai attacks, saying Indian authorities had so far failed to provide any report to Interpol.
Addressing a press conference with Interior Adviser Rehman Malik, the secretary general said Interpol had information of paramount importance that would help Pakistan’s Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) determine the full dimensions of the Mumbai attacks.

Information: “For the first time, we have detailed information on telephone numbers, bank accounts used in terrorist financing as well as internet addresses and the equipment and materials used to perpetrate these attacks,” Noble said.

He said all of the information was being checked against Interpol’s global databases to determine what international links might exist. “For the first time, we have police information on those who planned, facilitated and funded those attacks.”

The Interpol chief said they had sent key leads and information received from Pakistan to all of Interpol’s 187 member countries so that they could better protect their citizens and provide valuable information to Pakistan.

He said Pakistan would provide Interpol the DNA profiles that Islamabad obtained during its investigation into the Mumbai attacks. “The profiles will be compared against the world’s only global DNA database containing more than 83,000 DNA profiles,” he said. “In order for these comparisons to be complete India will be required to send Interpol the DNA profiles that they obtained in their investigation.”

He said Pakistani authorities’ cooperation following the Mumbai attacks had been nothing short of extraordinary, adding Islamabad had shown integrity by publicly admitting that the Mumbai attacks had been partly planned in the country.

Noble said seven countries, including India and some European states, were used for perpetrating the attacks.

The Interpol chief said Pakistan and its people were hit the worst by terrorism and the world stood with them in the war on terror.

Commenting on the Lahore terror attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team, he said it had some similarity with the Mumbai attacks, but nothing could be ascertained until he discussed the matter with the local officials.

Earlier, Interior Adviser Rehman Malik urged India to reply to 30 questions by Pakistan relating to the Mumbai attacks at the earliest.

The adviser said only 13 days were left of the remand of the Mumbai attacks’ accused held in Pakistan, adding that Pakistan was awaiting India’s response.

“Indian authorities should share the information details asked by Pakistan regarding the progress into the probe,” Malik said. “India should provide

COOL DOWN FRIENDS UL GET REPLY OVER 30 QUESTIONS SOON...

 

[NSG_BlackCats]

Pakistan will be getting the reply of it's 30 questions in next 2/3 days. The answers to those questions will have evidence in the form of documents,CDs and forensic report. As per P. Chidambaram home minister GoI he has got the report and has sent it to the External Affairs Ministry. MEA will call the Pakistan High Commisioner and will hand over the report to them.

 

[Beskar]

Media warned on Mumbai evidence

Thursday, 19 March 2009

BBC NEWS | South Asia | Media warned on Mumbai evidence
---------------------------------------------------------------​

An Indian court has ordered media not to broadcast certain material related to the Mumbai attacks, saying it may jeopardise next week's trial.

The court did not specify the material but said some evidence had already been "disclosed on television channels" and banned further such broadcasts.

It is believed it includes intercepted conversations by the alleged gunmen.

The trial of [sic] Pakistani national Mohammed Ajmal Amir Qasab and others is scheduled to begin early next week.

To read more, Visit the link .....

-----------------------------------------

Interesting news which not many people are talking about. This sudden "Warning" to the media was long awaited. For obvious reasons. The Indian court has refused to share the reasons why they've threatened their media, however, one can speculate that it MIGHT be because of the clips I'm providing here. Were they showing reruns of these "breaking news" clips? Yes, I know that these aren't the "Intercepted" calls but the calls that were made to the Indian media by the gunmen.

^ Listen carefully at 0:15. "Julm" and "Jiyadti"? I think this lad was trying to say "Zulam" and "Ziyadati" if he truly was from Pakistan. Somewhere in there he also uses the common Indian word "Shaanti". I don't care what "Qasab" has to say but if ANY body believes that THIS individual was brought up in Pakistan, then clearly they're not connecting the dots right.

Here's another one.

This case is still open. Is this the reason why they're warning the media? Because it obviously can't be because of all the "War Hysteria" that was being pumped by their media into the common man's TV screen.

 

[DarkStar]

To all Pakistani members, who knows the meaning of the word prasashan?

 

[Beskar]

To all Pakistani members, who knows the meaning of the word prasashan?

I've been to almost every major city in Pakistan. Never heard it in my life. Along with "Jiyadti" and "Shaanti".

 

[Gabbar]

Interesting news which not many people are talking about. This sudden "Warning" to the media was long awaited. For obvious reasons. The Indian court has refused to share the reasons why they've threatened their media, however, one can speculate that it MIGHT be because of the clips I'm providing here. Were they showing reruns of these "breaking news" clips?

Sir, gag order are often issued even in the US. If you read the news they are saying why Courts have issues gag order.

 

[Beskar]

Sir, gag order are often issued even in the US. If you read the news they are saying why Courts have issues gag order.

I'm not denying the fact that such orders are issued in almost every part of the world. I'm simply trying to understand the "Reason" why they're being issued to the Indian media.

 

[DarkStar]

how many use the words mudh bidh, shanti, prsasaashan, itihaas, parivaar, hamara babri masjid (incorrect grammar), aatank vadi, AK 47, Jindagi, sarkaar, Julm ziaystian, baat karta hay, tumhare ko, paat shalay, vidya shalay,

It is obvious that the person speaking in the video is Bharatiya, and probably not a muslim either, since there are hardly any Punjabi muslims left in Bharat and the ones that are left do not have such an atrocious accent.

Now don't tell me, that LeT trained them in sanksritized Hindi, while not teaching them simple things like how to launch a grenade.

Absolutely ludcirous.

 

[Gabbar]

I'm not denying the fact that such orders are issued in almost every part of the world. I'm simply trying to understand the "Reason" why they're being issued to the Indian media.

Court is saying that it may jeprotise the trial because media reports contain some meterial related to his statements. Why it's issued to Indian media only, because Indian courts can only order Indian media not international media.

 

[Gabbar]

how many use the words mudh bidh, shanti, prsasaashan, itihaas, parivaar, hamara babri masjid (incorrect grammar), aatank vadi, AK 47, Jindagi, sarkaar, Julm ziaystian, baat karta hay, tumhare ko, paat shalay, vidya shalay,

It is obvious that the person speaking in the video is Bharatiya.

Now don't tell me, that LeT trained them in sanksritized Hindi, while not teaching them simple things like how to launch a grenade.

Absolutely ludcirous.

Could this person be Indian, absolutely becuse media always try increase thier ratings and this applies to both sides.

Or this person could be haox caller and channel fell for it because they desprate to increase thier ratings.

 

[Beskar]

Court is saying that it may jeprotise the trial because media reports contain some meterial related to his statements. Why it's issued to Indian media only, because Indian courts can only order Indian media not international media.

Yes I'm slightly aware of the reasons why they think it'll "Jeopardize" the trial. You're missing the point here. It's not about "Justifying" their warning to the Indian media but more about the reasons for the sudden warning.

Why it's issued to Indian media only, because Indian courts can only order Indian media not international media.

This statement doesn't have anything to do with any post on this thread.

 

[Beskar]

Could this person be Indian, absolutely becuse media always try increase thier ratings and this applies to both sides.

Or this person could be haox caller and channel fell for it because they desprate to increase thier ratings.

The 21st century Media is capable enough to trace sensitive incoming calls from their locations using various "Sources" to get confirmations. If that wasn't the case, every other person would be calling CNN claiming that they are Osama Bin Laden.