What's new

Move away from agriculture, Chinese economist advises

Move away from agriculture, Chinese economist advises
ISLAMABAD:

Pakistan can double its annual economic growth rate to 10% by moving away from being an agriculture-based economy, and dying Chinese industries can become an instrument to achieve this objective, professor Justin Yifu Lin, a Counselor at the influential State Council of China, said on Tuesday.


Sectors where China is losing its competitive advantage can become Pakistan’s latent advantage, said the professor, also a former vice-president of the World Bank and author of 24 books. He said that light manufacturing industries that have been declared “sunset industries” in China can be relocated to Pakistan.

Boosting agriculture: Experts call for collaborative efforts

Pakistan has maintained a decent economic growth rate but it is still relatively poor, said professor Lin, while highlighting flaws of Pakistan’s economic structure and the way forward for the economy of 200 million people.

His economic development theory gives a centre stage to the government as a facilitator aimed at overcoming externality and coordination challenges during the transformation phase.

China will move from labour-intensive to capital-intensive industry and this will free 85 million jobs that will relocate to other countries, said the professor. “China’s upgrading to higher industries will leave a huge space for Pakistan to enter a labour-intensive industrialisation development phase”, he added.

“Poverty is not the destiny of Pakistan,” said Professor Lin while delivering a lecture on how to achieve dynamic growth at the Planning Commission.

If Pakistan can capture this opportunity, it will be able to grow at 10% annually for 30 or more years and become a high middle income or even high income country,” said Professor Lin, one of China’s foremost economists.

Pakistan’s advantage

According to Pakistani thinkers, the country’s current economic structure is highly flawed, as more than half of the total national output is coming from the services sector that is not labour intensive.

Pakistan grew at 4.7% in the last fiscal year, which was not sufficient to create enough jobs to absorb the youth bulge. Its growth is job exclusive and has widened the gap between the rich and poor, according to independent economists.

The Chinese professor said that the two types of Chinese investments could come to Pakistan -infrastructure and export-oriented sectors. He said that Pakistan’s businesspersons could enter into joint ventures with Chinese partners.

The private sector of Pakistan has to change its mindset as days of protectionism are over, said Ahsan Iqbal, Federal Minister for Planning, Development and Reform. Iqbal said that if Pakistan remains unable to take advantage from 85 million dying jobs in China, these jobs would shift to other countries like Vietnam and Bangladesh.

Pakistan’s journey to success

Professor Lin suggested six steps for Pakistan to indentify sectors of latent competitive advantage. The first step is to find fast growing countries with up to 200% higher per capita income or about 30 years ago had similar per capita income. He said in 1979 China’s per capita income was 30% less than that of Pakistan but today Beijing’s per capita income was 550% more than of Pakistan.

He said that in the next step, the government should see if some private sector firms are already in these industries and should then facilitate them by removing constraints. In step three, the government should invite foreign firms to invest in sectors where the local firms are not working.

Problems riddle agriculture sector, say experts

In step four, the government should also pay attention to spontaneous self-discovery by private enterprises and give support to scale up successful private innovations in new industries.

In the second last step, Pakistan with poor infrastructure and bad business environment should set up special economic zones or industrial parks to overcome barriers to firm entry, attract foreign direct investment and encourage industrial clusters.

In the last step, the government may compensate pioneer firms identified above with tax incentive for a limited period, direct credits for investments and give access to foreign exchange.

The long-term development of China-Pakistan Economic Corridor also revolves around development of special economic zones.

Chinese industries willing to relocate to Pakistan provide excellent opportunity for Pakistan to grow at a faster pace, said Dr Ashfaque Hasan Khan, one of the leading economists of the country.

Use of new technologies to help reduce agri cost

Professor Lin said that for reducing transaction cost in the infrastructure sector Pakistan needs to improve customs, roads and rail networks. He also advised that the federal and provincial authorities should listen to the foreign investors in order to address their concerns.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 5th, 2017.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

source: https://tribune.com.pk/story/1374408/move-away-agriculture-chinese-economist-advises/

Hi,

We were well on our way to industrialization when Bhutto nationalised the industry---.

With a strong industrial base---our agriculture out put would be much better.
 
No! In-fact we must focus on agriculture. Since it is a form of primary industry and would provide raw material , as well as food for the people.
Pakistan has a large area which doesn't support agriculture where we can build industries.
 
Pakistan is blessed with a wide range of climate and we should take full advantage of it

Some years back my dad (MNC food industry background) said that Pakistan has huge potential to grow safflower as a summer crop (low water requirement too). Safflower oil is far better than olive oil (less fats) and it is not cheap either. Not sure if anyone is growing safflower in Pak yet but about a decade or so ago no one was.

You need a Professional Class!

Unfortunately at the moment, this class looks outside Pakistan for opportunities due to the feudals running the show. And those retired are not being utilised even for occasional consultancy. A lot of knowledge pool is either being wasted or living abroad.
 
I'm not sure whether it's appropriate to put my 2 cents here, but I sincerely wish Pakistan stable and prosperous which is not only interest of Pakistan, but also aligned to China's interest, China need a stable and prosperous Pakistan. The current situation is, India is desperately, eagerly stimulating domestic industry development, if Pakistan can not catch up in some sectors, it will be a big challenge to Pakistan's future. The Kashmir issue is a LONG TERM issue, the winner will be the country which can keep stable, and keep prosperous. Kashmir will finally belong to the winner, or go independent. The title of this article apparently imply the concerns from SOME Pakistan Establishment regarding the agriculture sector which is the foundation of Pakistan economy. I know that land is private property here, landlord can rent their land to poor people,
so it's a very stable cash flow for landlords. Industry development may impact interest of landlords, landlord worry that industry will compete cheap labors with agriculture, or government will requisite land in cheap price. The truth is there're lots of redundant labors in Pakistan, these labors can be utilized to facilitate low end manufacture industry which can create lots of jobs.
Apparently Lin's suggestion is to emphasize on industry development, not emphasize on 'shift from agriculture', the title is misleading. It simply reflect the concerns from SOME people.
China is upgrading its industry sector to high end, robotics based, many cheap labors will be replaced by robotics this is a world wide trend. However, some sectors still rely heavily on cheap labors, if Pakistan can not grasp this opportunity, these factories will be relocated to Africa, or SEA countries. CPEC in my eyes is essentially a stabilizer for Pakistan's society and economy, which could help to build a decent industrial foundation for Pakistan's development,
e.g. electricity power, high way, railway, port, manufacture factories, which is experience when China opened door to the rest of world. It's a tough task for Pakistan to implement the plans, this require government's determination and hard works and people's cooperation. If China intend to earn big money from the $45 billion investment, it's better to pour into other region, e.g. SEA or Africa, not Pakistan, so it's a strategic investment, not profit driven.


Presently Pakistan has 75-80% Economy dependent on Agriculture , which is not a bad thing as Pakistani love our Fruits and Vegetabes and abundance of farm animal and fresh food. The efficiency production has to improve by 10 times. Better farming techniques (None Genetic based) . May be introduce better techniques to "save" food from going bad in open or saving food so it can be eaten over 1-2 year (food that can be saved safely)

Now the Chinese think tank is not incorrect to say we need to improve our Industrial base and services sector (100% correct) and that is why we do have economic zones planned in 4 provinces to allow , companies to bring in their investment and production centers to help provide workforce to work on certain aspect of Industrial nature.

An ideal format that would work for Pakistan would be

a) 20 % Economy dependent on Agriculture (not reducing existing production level)
b) 30% Industrial Sector focus( Textiles / Machinery / Tech/ Electronics)
c) 25% Service oriented Economy / Minning / Extracting raw minerals etc
d) Trade Zone 25%

The present focus is too much on Agriculture end which obviously will change gradually

To my understanding Government of Pakistan does have setup economic Industrial Zones in each Province, the industrial land does provide ample chance for companies to setup industrial units easily where all services would be present from infrastructure point of view
 
Last edited:
Very useful link, thanks! Agriculture in China only employs about 2% of the population, and yet output is largest in the world by far (approx $1 trillion per year, almost five times of US). Fundamental food security is not a problem, rising and diversifying demands from urban middle class can be satisfied by imports. International trade is always necessary, no nation produces better salmon than Norway, better avocado than Mexico.

I agree with the OP, from an employment perspective Pakistan should move workforce into industrial and services sectors. That doesn't mean agriculture is no longer important, rather it means tech and mechanization can increase productivity, basic food security is always a must.

If you look at China, its a very sudden drop in that link form 2002-2003.

Do you know if there was some re-classification or such that went on?

At this link ...the number is lot different for China:

https://ourworldindata.org/agricultural-employment/
 
If you look at China, its a very sudden drop in that link form 2002-2003.

Do you know if there was some re-classification or such that went on?

At this link ...the number is lot different for China:

https://ourworldindata.org/agricultural-employment/
The link also claims World Bank so might as well stick to the official source for accuracy. About the data I perhaps you were right, re-classification, or say conforming to World Bank's standard statistical methodology from 2003 onward.
 
agriculture dependency and high import duties are killing Pakistani industries..taxing imports at 60% is just plain ridiculous and has infested our roads, industry and life with 30-40 year old tech.
 
Well the road crisis is self created due to lack of Metro Solution in cities over 10 million population

Even if we had created a basic train "surface" solution by our own "worker / Masdoor" mentality plank by plank , metal rod by metal rod we would have had a shiny surface train solution which would be our version of metro. 100% Locally made

However , very difficult when our largest cities can't even pick up garbage from roads and maintain a National grade park in Karachi

I can only imagine what kind of crisis exist in other cities
 
The link also claims World Bank so might as well stick to the official source for accuracy. About the data I perhaps you were right, re-classification, or say conforming to World Bank's standard statistical methodology from 2003 onward.

BTW does China have any of its own statistics regarding employment by primary, secondary, tertiary sectors etc?
 
BTW does China have any of its own statistics regarding employment by primary, secondary, tertiary sectors etc?
I looked up a bit, seems like statistical caliber used to be quite different, national stats focused on rural population vs urban population, perhaps it's unique due to decades old tradition of Hukou policy, instead of employment by sector which is what World Bank is doing. Anyway I will dig some more info.
 
Urbanization Rate of China is about 56%, so left 44% peasants, it's about 616 millions by a total of 1.4 billion. There's 168 millions peasants go out to work (non-agriculture) in 2015, so there's 448 millions working on agriculture full time at most (this number include old, children).
So there's 32% full time peasants (include old, children).
 
I Think China is also buying lands in Punjab and elsewhere for Agriculture?
 
Back
Top Bottom