What's new

More Indians should listen to this lady

If I say the same about Kashmir, you'll get your big head and tell me how I am wrong, whereas you have no idea about Indian Kashmir. Why speak about something you don't know about? I never spoke about Balochistan cause I never talked to those people, I've never been there, I never took pains to understand the situation.

Same applies to you. Come to Kashmir, talk to people, live here for sometime and understand the problems, you'll then come to know what the situation really is like. Then we'll talk on this matter.

You cant talk abouit kashmir bcoz thats not true..............can u swear upon ur granth say say the same about kashmir?
 
.
Exactly the same can be said about Kashmir. The videos you watch on the internet are not even 1% of the total population. Kashmir is peaceful and an integral part of India. Period.

Incorrect, Kashmir and Balochistan are completely different issues!

Also, Most Kashmiris within Indian Occupied Kashmir want an independance, after that they want Pakistan! They want nothing to do with India! While all Kashmiris within Azad-Kashmir (Free Kashmir or Part of Kashmir controlled by government of Pakistan), they are all Pro-Pakistani, and our Pakistani brotherss/sisters and many soldiers from there have given their lives for this Pak sar zameen!

I have met many Kashmiris (I am part Kashmiri myself, so I have more relation to that land that you will ever have) who are against India, but not a single Balochi who was against Pakistan! And I live here in Canada, which is very multicultural, and I have met many different people!

So keep your nonsensical statements to yourself!
 
.
Incorrect, Kashmir and Balochistan are completely different issues!

Also, Most Kashmiris within Indian Occupied Kashmir want an independance, after that they want Pakistan! They want nothing to do with India! While all Kashmiris within Azad-Kashmir (Free Kashmir or Part of Kashmir controlled by government of Pakistan), they are all Pro-Pakistani, and our Pakistani brotherss/sisters and many soldiers from there have given their lives for this Pak sar zameen!

I have met many Kashmiris (I am part Kashmiri myself, so I have more relation to that land that you will ever have) who are against India, but not a single Balochi who was against Pakistan! And I live here in Canada, which is very multicultural, and I have met many different people!

So keep your nonsensical statements to yourself!


I doubt your cliaim to be a Kashmiri ....you neither seem to know the history not topography nor the people who reside there....needless reponding to you. Mere rheoteric and sloganeering doesn't help.

India being a democracy allows within its constitutional framework to voice dissent UNLIKE CHINA AND PAKISTAN.
Majority of people of Kashmir which includes Kashmiri Brahmins, Buddhist, Muslims and Hindus want to live with India and this is displayed by the way they participate in local elections. In all previous wars, the local kashmiris have supported and fought alogwith with Indian Army to defeat Pakistan....Go Check Independent sites.....Just Google Dude.
 
.
Incorrect, Kashmir and Balochistan are completely different issues!

Also, Most Kashmiris within Indian Occupied Kashmir want an independance, after that they want Pakistan! They want nothing to do with India! While all Kashmiris within Azad-Kashmir (Free Kashmir or Part of Kashmir controlled by government of Pakistan), they are all Pro-Pakistani, and our Pakistani brotherss/sisters and many soldiers from there have given their lives for this Pak sar zameen!

I have met many Kashmiris (I am part Kashmiri myself, so I have more relation to that land that you will ever have) who are against India, but not a single Balochi who was against Pakistan! And I live here in Canada, which is very multicultural, and I have met many different people!

So keep your nonsensical statements to yourself!

Pro-Pakistan ,,, huh??


 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
I bet all those who claim that Indian Kashmiris want freedom don't know a thing about Kashmir. Read my signature.

You can post 10s of videos and the same can be done by the Indians. It just won't prove a thing.

If Kashmiris are fed up of India, why didn't they help your so called Mujahideen who entered Indian territory in 1999, who by God's grace rest in their graves.
 
.
there is an assumption you are making here which i believe is flawed.

when you say that kashmiris have an ethnicity and identity distinct and different from that of india, you are assuming that a monolithic "indian" identity exists.

this i believe is a flawed perception. india is not a monolithic entity. when u compare a bengali and a malyali person. even they share nothing in terms of ethnicity,history , etc. so how can they be part of the same ethnicity and history which you claim the kashmiris are distinct from?

Its religion that makes the difference no matter how much people deny it when it comes to kashmir.
Majority muslim areas where supposed to join pakistan and the majority hindu areas to join india......thats what the partition was about.....faith.
Why is it that muslim ruler of junagarh wanted to join pakistan and the hindu population wanted to join india ,if no other reason then being of the same faith?
The same goes for kashmir....hindu king wants to join india but muslim population wants to join or ally with pakistan.
Its hinduism that binds india.
 
Last edited:
.
If Kashmiris are fed up of India, why didn't they help your so called Mujahideen who entered Indian territory in 1999, who by God's grace rest in their graves.

Maybe because theres not many locals living in the mountains of kargil?........its like me saying "why didnt the locals in sachin not help out".
 
.

Yes they are, just because they complain of poverty, means nothing against the nation.

Now lets talk about India, are these people all anti-Indians?




38ffff1e58bf69fb6df5f09be0f0b884.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
What's the need to discuss Balochistan in this forum.Never beena disputed territory: Baloch people are Pakistanis and they will be forever;while Kashmir is a disputed state according to UN.
 
.
What's the need to discuss Balochistan in this forum.Never beena disputed territory: Baloch people are Pakistanis and they will be forever;while Kashmir is a disputed state according to UN.

When someone is critical of India, these Indians try and change the subject. When someone is critical of Pakistan, we analyse the situation and discuss it.

This is the Indian mentality...
 
.
This thread needs to be closed for good its causing tension's between members a is turning in to a fav troll resting area plzz mods close this bs thread.
 
.
The disputed Kashmir is only the portion that is occupied by Pakistan....and by the same logic and standard Pakistan employs,

Our logic is simple.......we have elections under the UN or international observers in all of pak-indo kashmir and we ask three questions.
1.Do you want independence
2.Do you want to pakistan
3.Do you want to join india

And then accept the result.


Balochistan is also on the same base as Kashmir.:coffee:

Kashmir is recognized as disputed territories and thats why theres a UN resolution on the issue ,while Balochistan and Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura, punjab ect are not disputed territories and neither have any UN resolution covering them
 
. .
Its religion that makes the difference no matter how much people deny it when it comes to kashmir.
Majority muslim areas where supposed to join pakistan and the majority hindu areas to join india......thats what the partition was about.....faith.Why is it that muslim ruler of junagarh wanted to join pakistan and the hindu population wanted to join india ,if no other reason then being of the same faith?
The same goes for kashmir....hindu king wants to join india but muslim population wants to join or ally with pakistan.
Its hinduism that binds india.

Please prove your assertions based on the mountbatten plan which was basis of partition, show me where the princely states were to go based on faith as opposed to kings will and geographic integrity.
 
.
Please prove your assertions based on the mountbatten plan
which was basis of partition, show me where the princely states were to go based on faith as opposed to kings will and geographic integrity.

Doesnt matter if the mountbatten plan made any reference to faith, the facts are that the majority muslim areas went to pakistan and the majority hindu areas went to to india,kashmir being the exception, where a muslim majority area is ruled by india and runs counter to the logic of the partition.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom