MOHAN BHAGWAT IS RIGHT: India is a 'Hindu' Nation.

[INDIC]

Bengal wasnt the first part to fall under Muslim rule. Other North Indian parts were defeated before it.

Don't you Bangladeshis loathe the Sena Dynasty.

 

[Skull and Bones]

I have heard your claims earlier too...... heard claims from skulls & bones too. Both of you make a good pair. ............. it all seems pretty sad.

I have many independent jury to testify for my identity and credentials, speak about you, moron.

 

[Bong]

Don't you Bangladeshis loathe the Sena Dynasty.

No, all ancient histories associated with present BD is our integral part. Our history books teach us those.
Me and any Bangladeshis should have no problems with that.

 

[Shariqattari]

All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM) leader Akbaruddin Owaisi attacked the RSS and Narendra Modi’s politics at Bhendi Bazar on Wednesday. Calling Modi the “greatest actor ever” and slamming RSS leaders for allegedly forcing their Hindutva ideologies on the nation through Doordarshan, Owaisi said the country is turning a Hindu Rashtra and he wants to be the voice of ignored Muslims in the state and protect their freedom.

“Mohan Bhagwat says identity of India is Hinduism. Modi tweets that Bhagwat was correct. If I had tweeted Indian identity is Islam, what would have happened?”
Owaisi: ‘Could I have tweeted Indian identity is Islam? | The Indian Express

Azam seeks apology from Bhagwat for ‘Hindu nation’ remark -

A day after a Delhi court asked the police to file an action taken report on a plea seeking lodging of an FIR against RSS head Mohan Bhagwat, VHP leader Praveen Togadia and Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan for their alleged “hate speeches”, the SP politician demanded an apology from the Sangh chief for his “Hindu rashtra” remark. - See more at: Azam seeks apology from Bhagwat for ‘Hindu nation’ remark | The Indian Express

See more at: Azam seeks apology from Bhagwat for ‘Hindu nation’ remark | The Indian Express

 

[jbond197]

That wan't a threat, I wasn't aware that you on the bengali bashing bandwagon... I am a bengali, tell me am I any less patriotic then you are....

I am not questioning anybody's patriotism. I was questioning the claim that Bengalis were the biggest freedom fighters of the country.

And as I said before, I am not afraid of any down ratings or bans. So don't try threaten me and next time If you feel like just do it.

 

[danger007]

I am not the one jokes are being written about. Did you read the how to be a liberal article I posted? Did you know who it was aimed at?

The article was not written by me but it was aimed at you and people like you. Bhadralok.



Oh the pack of hyenas being called upon. Or is it the zombies? Time to get my Mila Jojovich gear on.

you know single person can't handle mentally handicapped person. ..

 

[jbond197]

There were no Bengali state but states. Bengal kings were having a time of peace. So their forces were no places to defend themselves. As they didnt expect any invasion. Only 18 horsemen were enough to defeat one Bengal king.
Bengal wasnt the first part to fall under Muslim rule. Other North Indian parts were defeated before it.

Keep your fairytale stories to yourself. I am talking to Indians here and the question was not put forth for you.

 

[Bong]

Keep your fairytale stories to yourself. I am talking to Indians here and the question was not put forth for you.

Ok then learn more histories and come here to talk.

 

[MilSpec]

I am not questioning anybody's patriotism. I was questioning the claim that Bengalis were the biggest freedom fighters of the country.

Please show me where did I claim that....? What did I respond to? and in what context....

I take grave offense to statements by some bigoted troll here who are maligning mallus and bengalis or even muslims of India based on thier caste creed religion language... I will take offense to that.... I will take the same offense if some one malligns telegus or christians or dalits or brahmins or any demographics....

You are free to have your political beliefs and fight tooth and nail to that... but singling out a certain group and claiming they are any lesser of Indians, which has been evident on this thread is something I take grave offense to..

 

[Vyom]

Wasn't Savarker , founder of Hinduism , transported to Kalapani for life?

Founder of 'Hinduism' ?? I mean you suffer from a defunct ALU in your brain or what ?

 

[Shariqattari]

Do you have an idea what SUPREME COURT of India thinks about Modi Govt ?

https://twitter.com/x/status/520417906555752448

 

[Vyom]

.... I am very much wanted and more importantly NEEDED. LOL.

How could I have been kicked out when I am still here ? ....... bengali logic. Now crawl back into your old age home shango.

Let me give you a Bihari one... Ja ke doob ja...

 

[Shariqattari]

Shiv Sena chief Uddhav supports Bhagwat’s ‘Hindu nation’ remarks -

Backing RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat over his “Hindutva” comments, Shiv Sena president Uddhav Thackeray on Tuesday said there is nothing wrong in his remarks. “I support the comments made by Mohan Bhagwat. When he says that India is a Hindu nation, what’s wrong with it. Balasaheb Thackeray used to say the same thing for a long time. So how can we change our stand on the issue today?” Uddhav said while replying to a query from reporters here.

See more at: Shiv Sena chief Uddhav supports Bhagwat’s ‘Hindu nation’ remarks | The Indian Express

 

[jbond197]

The reason I pointed out to the map is, it is perfectly apt to show even after Islamic Invasion in the Ganga-Doab valley in the 12th Century, vast number of Muslim converts are concentrated profoundly on the peripheral patches of India i.e. North West and East Bengal which explains the fact that the Rajput/Maratha resistance even after failing to restrict the invasion quite successfully prevented mass conversion of Indians in the region where the Islamic empire build its foundation mainly which is Central India.This data refutes the assumption that, in the absence of Rajput/Maratha resistance India would have become an Islamic country like Persia.

As far as, Bengali resistance to Islamic Invasion is concerned, the comparison is again utterly absurd when you are failing repeatedly to explain the reason why Rajput principalities failed to act as an united force against the invasion.

In 12th century, the Rajputs were the ones who due to internal division failed completely in stopping the Islamic invasion (Maratha Empire came into existence much later- do you think I am talking about Hindutva history here? ) but their resistance was so stiff that Islamic forces when they took the Delhi seat they thought it was wise not to infuriate them and their populace further. They formed alliances with the Rajput Kings to be able to rule with out having to face the collective wrath of all of them and with a promise that their populace will not be forced to convert. So the conversions mostly happened at places which came directly under Muslim rule like Awadh, Bengal, Deccan etc where as the regions which fell under Rajputs, Jats, Dogras ras, Sikhs, Maratha faced least conversion. It was not a change of heart but it was purely out of fear that if various enraged Kings joins hand it will be their end. That saved India from turning into Persia.

The various Rajput Kings did not join hand because of infighting and other issues.

 

[Luca1]

India is indeed a Hindu nation. Hinduism is one of the three factors what tie India together as a nation. The other two factors are English language and English parliamentary style democracy.