What's new

Modi UK visit: British MPs want to raise human rights issues, ban on 'India's Daughter' with Indian

. .
That old bitch of an island is insignificant where she and her ancestors live on the looted money of Indians and Pakistanis, don't u want your looted wealth back, it is a very good opportunity to demand these British robbers to return back all the wealth to India and demand apology from the queen and her thugs for apartheid and also take england to ICJ for committing crime on humanity for killing millions of indians , conducting genocide of Australian aboriginals and red Indians, and that shameless bitch wears a looted robbed diamond on her crown.

Now you are being too emotional bro.:lol:
 
.
David Cameroon is the current British PM. And yes because of that accountability, the British PM might be obliged to ask uncomfortable questions to Modi.

You seriously think that David Cameron is going to ask Modi uncomfortable questions ?
 
.
Lol. What you call welcoming, is just protocol in diplomatic parlance. Any head of state will get such a 'welcome', whereever he/she goes, including commercial institutions. What was HUGE news of Modi visiting US recently, barely made even a blip on page 3 here! Not many desis, except hardcore Modi fans, knew that he was here.

Ahem, Tony Blair stepped down years ago! David Cameroon is the current British PM. And yes because of that accountability, the British PM might be obliged to ask uncomfortable questions to Modi.
Not our concern,if UK wants to do business with Bharat.
They can cry anything they like,we are not obliged to answer them.
 
.
You seriously think that David Cameron is going to ask Modi uncomfortable questions ?
In private, probably yes. Public sound bites dished out are very much different from what goes on in private. Of course, you already know this.
 
.
one is the figurehead of a powerful country and the other is CEO of a social website?

No, she is a relic of the dark ages... a monarchist in the 21st century in a nation which sees itself as part of a democratic world.

Mark Zuckerberg is entrepreneur of the 21st century: Young, innovative, modern and he understands the enormous potential of the IT world.... oh and he is richer :tup:
 
.
No, she is a relic of the dark ages... a monarchist in the 21st century in a nation which sees itself as part of a democratic world.

Mark Zuckerberg is entrepreneur of the 21st century: Young, innovative, modern and he understands the enormous potential of the IT world.... oh and he is richer :tup:
again, no matter how rich he is, you cannot compare him to the head of a state, no matter how powerless
 
.
again, no matter how rich he is, you cannot compare him to the head of a state, no matter how powerless

You can. She isnt untouchable. For example you can compare them in terms of wealth: Zuckerberg wins.
You can compare them in power, Zuckerberg wins. His influence with a network which connects billions around the world is certainly bigger than the Queens. Nothing spreads ideas faster than the internet does.
 
.
You can. She isnt untouchable. For example you can compare them in terms of wealth: Zuckerberg wins.
You can compare them in power, Zuckerberg wins. His influence with a network which connects billions around the world is certainly bigger than the Queens. Nothing spreads ideas faster than the internet does.
can Mark officially declare war? does every law need his signature? can she fire a Govt?
 
.
can Mark officially declare war? does every law need his signature? can she fire a Govt?

The Queen is just show my friend. She cannot declare war, or just block legislation against the will of the MPs.

Zuckerbergs brainchild on the other hand, can literally reach billions of people and connects them in a way which hasnt been there before.
 
.
The Queen is just show my friend. She cannot declare war, or just block legislation against the will of the MPs.

Zuckerbergs brainchild on the other hand, can literally reach billions of people and connects them in a way which hasnt been there before.
dude, she is the only one who can officially declare war, her signatures ARE needed on every law, so yeah Queen 1 Mark 0
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom