Modi to join Bangabandhu’s birth centenary celebrations online

[N.Siddiqui]

Yes. He got four years, if he didn't get his act together people will vote him out of power.

It's not the economy-stupid....(used the phrase)

He has removed the article 370, Kashmir/Kashmir valley has turned into the largest prison. He got approved the CAA, Muslims are out of the would be immigrants to India list...the uniform civil code is about to be formulated(Muslims will cease to hold the unique personal family laws and clauses)...

Muslims are accepted to live in India as oppressed, marginalized second class citizens...not as equals, get this clear everyone, kind of idea.

 

[Chhatrapati]

Does that makes him eligible to be selected as PM., the glibness and gift-of-gab rather.

To be eligible, you have to win election directly through votes, or nominated from a local legislature. Then his party forms a majority, elect him as the parliamentary party leader, that makes him eligible for the post.

It's not the economy-stupid....

He has removed the article 370, Kashmir/Kashmir valley has turned into the largest prison. He got approved the CAA, Muslims are out of the would be immigrants to India list...the uniform civil code is about to be formulated(Muslims will cease to hold the unique personal family laws and clauses)...

Muslims are accepted to live in India as oppressed, marginalized second class citizens...not as equals, get this clear everyone kind of idea.

It is always the economy-stupid. If the public is dissatisfied, that is living under high inflation pressure, opening papers to read about corruption scandals that's when people voted against a government.

If we conduct voting now, Modi would still win because any idiot who reads Art 370, or CAA would find nothing wrong with what Modi did. Show me any Muslim who become stateless because of CAA. Please prove your claims, the law is already in place.

Why should Muslims have separate family laws? Everyone should have one single law like any democratic nation.
Muslims are equal before the law, if not given special freebies because of minority status, they get special scholarships, reserved quotas in govt jobs and have equal opportunity to go up in the social and economic ladder. Can't say the same about Pak Hindus, who are marginalized, do not get to be in higher echelons of power, are demonized in Pak textbooks and their beliefs are mocked. Their girls are abducted and married of to old fuks, if they remotely criticize majority religion i.e Islam, blasphemy laws are slapped and are given the death sentence.
Muslims in India (Shia - Sunni - Ahmedi) can openly pray in a mosque without getting bombed. You couldn't even provide security to all the Muslims in Pakistan, heck you don't even consider Ahmedi as Muslims raze their mosques and you have the veracity to talk about India.

 

[mmr]

You mean these scammers right?!
The mighty IT industry... what a laugh.....

Yes. They have stolled millions from Canadians. Specifically white old couples. Its heartbreaking how they stealing money. Most of these older ppl are on pensions and old age security with very limited income.

I also get call as fake Microsoft agents asking me to install mallware to "fix" my computer even i dont have any problem.

One of my female friend who is white received blackmail messages from these scums saying they have recorded her on webcam and unless she do what they ask..she will be exposed. She now file a case with RCMP.

 

[VikingRaider]

As long as you don't make an enemy out of India, you'll be fine.

We are not making an enemy out of India or anyone. We are friends to every one who is not enemy. I hope your authority understand it too. If not only then if can be worse in future.

Again as I said if even bangladesh once become rich( no need to troll) or militarily very powerful, still we won't have any enmity with anyone untill they turned into an enemy.

We are Switzerland of the East who will not show enmity untill others are showing. Thank you.

Why Modi is not going to Bangladesh, for these celebrations, as he has been invited?

Major celebration was postponed because of coronavirus. It's a trick from Hasina we believe. Only 3 is infected and they actually returned from Italy , and no new infected detected in bangladesh. So I am sure that we are safe inshallah. Just we have to remain careful.

But considering it an issue hasina just postponed It we believe. Read more opinion on theese threads.

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/muji...foreign-guests-are-not-coming-for-now.656200/

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/modi-defers-dhaka-visit.656347/

 

[VikingRaider]

Why should Muslims have separate family laws? Everyone should have one single law like any democratic nation.

@Chhatrapati
Read bold red part thoroughly if you really want to know the talaq system in Islam. It's a difficult procedure unlike the mullah version of three talaq at one.
Muslim family law is based on many major issue. I really admire ayub khan that he abolished three talaq at once for joint Pakistan and its still continuing in bangladesh (despite any fitnabazi of mullahs) . I know many hanafi Muslim will be agitated, but the reality is Islam doesn't support it ( three talaq at once) .

Even Islam doesn't support any single talaq if you are angry as angry person is out of mind and lose his sanity. So such people can't take right decision. Besides both Shia and salafi ( normal version called ahle hadith) , agree on this issue.

And also other than an ijma of Umar ( later he regreted) you will never find such odd decision in Islam. He did it for some very strong reason but it's a big too big too discuss here. Still he regreted later but Mullahs hide the story from common hanafi Muslims.

Now read the red part bellow if you really want to know about real law of talaq system in Islam. I can't give ready reference at that moment as I heard if from our local Ahle Hadeeth Imam from our Mosque and he is very wise man, not some type of kathmullah who live on selling Islam.
Now read below the red bold part thoroughly -

The real talaq law is, if you are in sane mind and really dicide that you won't live with your wife ( or will give her warning as first talaq), then you have to follow a procedure and that is,"You can not make love to your wife from her last day of period to another first day of period, ( in between when you can actually Intercourse with her) , and if still you are stick on your decision, then you can give her one talaq only. Then you have to take her back before one month. If one month is over, you will have to remarry, but she will not be forbidden for you, just have to remarry her if don't take her back within one month. You can follow the procedure total three time.

And if you want to leave her forever, you have to follow this procedure 3 times in 3 months without making love with her ( the process is highly discouraged untill you directly caught he cheating physically with another man, because without the case of adultery, she deserve three chance
) . But after three talaq ( following the right procedure) you can't take her back untill she marry another man with intention of living together lifetime with her new husband. And later of the new husband died, or divorce her willingly, not as a part of any intention of Niqah halala ( that's actually adultery and strictly forbidden in Islam), then only previous husband can marry her again if they both want.

And my question is, if a wife cough adultery a husband will never ever trust her, so you guess he won't take her back ever right? So actually talaq is a very difficult procedure. in pure Islamic system, not like that a mentally unstable man ( aren't even allowed to marry untill he is saying kobul 3 times in sane mind, do couples get married when angry? ) said talaq talaq talaq and it happened. No Islam is not like that weak, it's the mullah version that is propagated for some intention to make Muslim families (that were very strongly bound as fortress) weak.

(You guys hate zakir nayek but it's zakir nayek who preach such authentic thing that is a safe guard for family life according to solid Islam, although not talking other controversial issues as it's different topic ).

History say that Muslim families were like fortress and very hard to penetrate. That's why British made many division and create many fake mullahs to destroy the real teaching of Islam and also actually made the Muslim family fortress very weak. They did it only to divide and rule.

So yes I really appreciate only one decision of modi very much. Although he didn't wanted to save Muslims, but he actually saved family bond. So actually he elevated Muslim family law unconsciously ( now most of people will disagree here because they are follower of some mullah in the case).

But for Muslim inheritance law no one should ever poke their noes as it's directly from quran.

 

[BanglarBagh]

Why should Muslims have separate family laws? Everyone should have one single law like any democratic nation

Well if u put it like that, Indian muslims should also have rights to butcher cows and eat beef like any democratic nation!!!
What say ya to that?!!

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Check the body language...and compare this with Modi's extra friendly(read Chaiwala gestures).

Modi and Trump...subordinate and master, and head of states don't indulge in such street urchin behavior, a chaiwala do. Diplomatic norms thrown to the bins.

Amateurism

 

[Kaleem.61]

Modi k armano ka balatkaar...

Rape of his dreams #modi

 

[Chhatrapati]

Well if u put it like that, Indian muslims should also have rights to butcher cows and eat beef like any democratic nation!!!
What say ya to that?!!

Wherever law permits them to do, they can slaughter cows and eat it.

It is not an excuse for having regressive family laws. If you can't eat cow meat, eat cara beef.

 

[newb3e]

Mitroonnn hamari protests say nai virus say phaati hai isliye nai gaye Bangladesh!

wah Modi g wah!!

 

[BanglarBagh]

Wherever law permits them to do, they can slaughter cows and eat it.

It is not an excuse for having regressive family laws. If you can't eat cow meat, eat cara beef.

A person should be able to eat whatever he/she wants. If you say the law may not permit eating beef in India then the Hindu religious customs dictate the law in India. Nice vemocracy(vedic democracy) u r preaching then.....

 

[Chhatrapati]

A person should be able to eat whatever he/she wants. If you say the law may not permit eating beef in India then the Hindu religious customs dictate the law in India. Nice democracy u r preaching then.....

No. There are certain laws that prevent eating certain animals especially cows like in many countries, despite their abundance.
And yes, it is part of the customs of this land more than a religious belief. Besides, if you can't live without eating beef you better move to places in India where it is not banned, say Kerala or North-East states.

And that's beside the fact that democracy in it's abstract is populism. Make sense?

 

[BanglarBagh]

No. There are certain laws that prevent eating certain animals especially cows like in many countries, despite their abundance.
And yes, it is part of the customs of this land more than a religious belief. Besides, if you can't live without eating beef you better move to places in India where it is not banned, say Kerala or North-East states.

And that's beside the fact that democracy in it's abstract is populism. Make sense?

By that logic democracy should be in it's abstract of customs and practices of populism. So you have no right to criticize Muslim familial laws. Makes sense?!!

 

[Chhatrapati]

By that logic democracy should be in it's abstract of customs and practices of populism. So you have no right to criticize Muslim familial laws. Makes sense?!!

I'm not criticizing Muslim family laws you can practice your personal laws in countries that permit it. In India, there will be one law for everyone when it comes to marriage, divorce, and inheritance of property.

You are drawing false equivalence with animal protection and family laws.
The right comparison will be, say hunting eagles is banned in the US, but hunting wild animals like deer is not. Eating any kind of wild animal is banned in India an if caught with deer meat, you will languish in prison for years.

It is not by logic certain laws are made, it is by virtue.

 

[Michael Corleone]

Bangladesh is in for rude awakening soon. Please safeguard your chaddi business.

Ok baniya

I'm not criticizing Muslim family laws you can practice your personal laws in countries that permit it. In India, there will be one law for everyone when it comes to marriage, divorce, and inheritance of property.

You are drawing false equivalence with animal protection and family laws.
The right comparison will be, say hunting eagles is banned in the US, but hunting wild animals like deer is not. Eating any kind of wild animal is banned in India an if caught with deer meat, you will languish in prison for years.

It is not by logic certain laws are made, it is by virtue.

India has laws?