My frind i know czar is a title. But the czar you are refering was in early 19 century. Hoax is nver denied by teaching anti hoax logics as a syllabus. Moreover, if you see my earlier post, i said that first time i read about new world order in the referred book in 1984; whereas publicly NWO term was first used by Clinton. Concept of multipolar world converting to bi polar and then uni polar world was also discussed in that, which preceded the intent of implementing NWO. Sequence of event in geopolitics further strengthens my confidence on the correctness of The Protocols. Political scenario at the time of publishing of the book also commensurate with the contents of it.
Media in todays era is highly under the influence of a particular ethanic group, therefore, truth is obscured. To find the truth one has to do own investigation and correlate it with the incidents happening around. What was mentioned in those protocols can be practically seen in the world affairs, thus evidence of it being correct stands a better chance againts an academic denial of it as hoax