Maulana Fazlur Rehman dream shattered - Supreme Court of Pakistan defines "Terrorist Activities"

[Ultima Thule]

Jinnah started Jihad in Kashmir. He sent in the troops and declared Kashmir as jugular vein of Pakistan

what the fcuk give me your backup/source for your crap, and why previous govts didn't reclaim Kashmir as Pakistan

 

[Bil]

Jinnah started Jihad in Kashmir. He sent in the troops and declared Kashmir as jugular vein of Pakistan

Seems like we all can learn and understand a lot from you about the history.

So you say that Jinnah urged mujahid's to start Jihad in Kashmir, wondering what was the reason to start this Jihad? Please enlighten us.

 

[El Sidd]

what the fcuk give me your backup/source for your crap, and why previous govts didn't reclaim Kashmir as Pakistan

Seems like we all can learn and understand a lot from you about the history.

So you say that Jinnah urged mujahid's to start Jihad in Kashmir, wondering what was the reason to start this Jihad? Please enlighten us.

Iqra

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1947–1948

You seems to have funny ideas.

Here is another funny idea.

PTI and PAT attacked the parliament and the supreme court and the State television.

Both President Alvi and Prime Minister Khan are facing charges in the ATC for that with case still not settled.

I see your tree and i raise you an axe.

 

[BATMAN]

Jinnah started Jihad in Kashmir which Imran Khan is advocating against.

 

[Bil]

Iqra

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1947–1948

Ok so now since you have shared your clumsy resource (honestly I was expecting something better), now lets see what happened actually in the past.

According to the Partition plan, the areas directly under British control were supposed to be divided into India and Pakistan, according to the majority population. Areas of Muslim majority went to Pakistan, Hindu and sikh to Indian Union.

The princely states, whereas were exempted from this. It was upto them, whether they choose to acceed to India or Pakistan, or even remain Independent. Most of the princely states chose to acceed to eithe India and Pakistan, with the exception of the Princely state of Jammu and Kashmir, which was a muslim majority state, with a Sikh as the ruler. So naturally, a question comes in mind, why a Princely state, wherein muslim are in majority wouldn't merge with a Muslim country?

The reason was Maharaja, who was a despotic ruler hated by the masses. According to India's policy the people of the princely state are to decide the future and not the Maharaja. This happened in case of Junaghad and Hyderabad when the Maharajas of both the states had signed accession with Pakistan, but due to the revolt by the local populace against the Maharaja and his decision, the decision was changed and in case of Junaghad a plebiscite was held.

But India's stated policy changed in Kashmir, when the Maharaja of J&K asked India to sign a stand still agreement, India rejected it. The IOA signed by the Maharaja is a fraudulent document and even if it is taken into consideration has to been seen along with the letter of Maharaja that he wrote to Mountbatten after the signing of IOA.

Here is the letter.

http://www.jammu-kashmir.com/documents/harisingh47.html

The letter states that the accession is conditional and the final future of the state shall be decided by the people of Kashmir.

Mountbatten wrote to the Maharaja and affirmed that position stating, “the final fate of the state shall be decided by the people.”

https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/kasmount.htm

Mountbatten's conditional acceptance of accession.

This is why many believe in Pakistan that the IOA signed by the Maharaja is a fraudulent/bogus document and even if it is taken into consideration has to been seen along with the letter of Maharaja that he wrote to Mountbatten after the signing of IOA. And Mountbatten response to the Maharaja.

Now does it make sense what happened back than or I totally lost you?

 

[Ultima Thule]

Iqra

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1947–1948



Here is another funny idea.

PTI and PAT attacked the parliament and the supreme court and the State television.

Both President Alvi and Prime Minister Khan are facing charges in the ATC for that with case still not settled.

I see your tree and i raise you an axe.

and tell me where your claims than Jinnah told this to do Jihad in IOK, and don't bring this crap again this prove nothing, and all you masters did almost same things

 

[SIPRA]

Maulana has served his purpose very well.Nawaz is out of jail,Zardari is in hospital,everything related to accountability has been lost into shadows of this whole scene.
He acted as pressure group.

Mullah Fuzla has been used by the Establishment, for the purpose; since they are not, at all, interested in any kind of serious and meaningful accountability. This is as clear as crystal.

 

[El Sidd]

Now does it make sense what happened back than or I totally lost you?

I had 97 out 100 in Pakistan studies.

The fact of the matter remains that Jinnah chose military action over any diplomatic action with respect to solving a colonial problem by design.

and tell me where your claims than Jinnah told this to do Jihad in IOK, and don't bring this crap again this prove nothing, and all you masters did almost same things

War of Kashmir happened or not?

 

[Bil]

I had 97 out 100 in Pakistan studies.

The fact of the matter remains that Jinnah chose military action over any diplomatic action with respect to solving a colonial problem by design.

Than I seriously doubt on the institute you went, because you clearly have no clue what are you talking about.

All you are doing is beating the bush, without providing any proof of your claims. Nobody wins an argument like this.

 

[Ultima Thule]

I had 97 out 100 in Pakistan studies.

The fact of the matter remains that Jinnah chose military action over any diplomatic action with respect to solving a colonial problem by design.

i want a source/links not your blabbering

War of Kashmir happened or not?

but not for in your retard logics

 

[El Sidd]

Than I seriously doubt on the institute you went, because you clearly have no clue what are you talking about.

All you are doing is beating the bush, without providing any proof of your claims. Nobody wins an argument like this.

The argument is not there to be won but tolerated. Only fascists believe that there is a winner and a loser in an argument and no wonder you support PTI.

i want a source/links not your blabbering

but not for in your retard logics

The fact of the matter remains the founder of Pakistan chose to go to war for Kashmir something which the current Prime Minister is advocating against all in the name of financial promises made by the international community.

 

[Ultima Thule]

The fact of the matter remains the founder of Pakistan chose to go to war for Kashmir something which the current Prime Minister is advocating against all in the name of financial promises made by the international community.

keep blabbering without a prove, you're nothing but just blabber

 

[Bil]

I had 97 out 100 in Pakistan studies.

The fact of the matter remains that Jinnah chose military action over any diplomatic action with respect to solving a colonial problem by design.

War of Kashmir happened or not?

Maharaja signed a conditional accession, according to which Indian army supposed to vacant the valley, why it didnt happen to-date?

 

[El Sidd]

keep blabbering without a prove, you're nothing but just blabber

ok

Maharaja signed a conditional accession, according to which Indian army supposed to vacant the valley, why it didnt happen to-date?

Why don't you bring that document since you care about alot deal about proofs?

State of India has so far claimed that it has been lost to fire but apparently PTI Canadians have it. Bring forth the accession document and then we can discuss it.

Fair enough?

 

[Bil]

The argument is not there to be won but tolerated. Only fascists believe that there is a winner and a loser in an argument and no wonder you support PTI.

Dude, are you drunk? Who is discussing PTI or Khan here? We are discussing your incorrect understand of Kashmir issue, however, you are rigid, who doesnt want to learn and understand the matter. And instead trying to derail the discussion.