What's new

Majority in Pak don't support terrorists: Khan

Well I might not be follower of the religion but I am a follower of its history..whether right or wrong ..people do it and they firmly believe, that what they believe is the right thing!!

Ageed to that, people and many of them many nations have gone on a campaign of terror killing and or conqest in the name of what ever that could have fuled it.

Besides my argument is not..what Taliban implemented was Sharia or not but, they did implement a set of laws if Afghanistan and then Swat and they called it Sharia and now they wan't to implement similar laws in Pakistan.

And my argument is that they can call it what ever they had wanted to, but that dont make it Islam. And that is what I had been saying thus far. They can try all they want to implement what ever they are trying to in Pakistan under the banner of disguise but success well that is another matter all together.
 
.
Many pakistanis supported terrorism when they were not the victim. There was always sympathy, always an explanation, always an apology for terror acts. Many pakistani, even Indian muslims celebrated 9/11. I think members here can remember that.
It is interesting how people change their mind when their own house is on fire.
 
.
Many pakistanis supported terrorism when they were not the victim. There was always sympathy, always an explanation, always an apology for terror acts. Many pakistani, even Indian muslims celebrated 9/11. I think members here can remember that.
It is interesting how people change their mind when their own house is on fire.

And look who is talking, its not like your own country holds a clean chit over such issues, and yet besharam honay ki koi limit nahi aap logon ki.
 
. .
Many pakistanis supported terrorism when they were not the victim. There was always sympathy, always an explanation, always an apology for terror acts. Many pakistani, even Indian muslims celebrated 9/11. I think members here can remember that.
It is interesting how people change their mind when their own house is on fire.
Mr. Khan was secretary when the people were not even known to the definition of terrorism. Majority Terrorism came into Pakistan when US entered Afghanistan i.e. post 9/11. and its magnitude increased after India entered into Afghanistan. So your point is based on assumptions, not facts.
 
.
Majority Terrorism came into Pakistan when US entered Afghanistan i.e. post 9/11. and its magnitude increased after India entered into Afghanistan.

That does not negate the fact that majority of Pakistanis supported terrorism when they were not the victim.
 
.
Mr. Khan was secretary when the people were not even known to the definition of terrorism. Majority Terrorism came into Pakistan when US entered Afghanistan i.e. post 9/11. and its magnitude increased after India entered into Afghanistan. So your point is based on assumptions, not facts.

You did not contradict me, you just showed when most terror started to happened inside pakistan. My point was pakistani were sympathetic to terror cause(some still are)when they were not the victim.
In any case it is my view, I cannot prove it, I can only ask forum members to think of their stand when 9/11 happened, or when terrorism in India was in full swing.
 
. .
You did not contradict me, you just showed when most terror started to happened inside pakistan. My point was pakistani were sympathetic to terror cause(some still are)when they were not the victim.
In any case it is my view, I cannot prove it, I can only ask forum members to think of their stand when 9/11 happened, or when terrorism in India was in full swing.

I did contradict you, as you made 'not being victim' as base for support of terrorism. Its not about sympathy to terror, as like 26/11, indians are victims of the same so their sympathy flew away. Like rest of the world doesnt care, as they are not victim, they simply kept quiet and their 'quiet' in no way means that they support terrorism.
 
. .
I did contract you, as you made 'not being victim' as base for support of terrorism. Its not about sympathy to terror, as like 26/11, indians are victims of the same so their sympathy flew away. Like rest of the world doesnt care, as they are not victim, they simply kept quiet and their 'quiet' in no way means that they support terrorism.

Yaar point is simple, these indians are so full of it themselves that they cant even tell if the stench is of their own or someone else's. So they go for the easy way out blame the others for all the ills, while they themselves are neck deep in a pile of cr@p..
 
.
Just to give you an idea of what kind of place Pakistan is and what kinds of ideas animate the "rulers" of Pakistan and it may give you some insight into the rubbish about majority being against terrorism -- what the majority are, is brutalized, and what the minority are is brutalized :

Ediitorial - the News International

Majorly’ shameful

Monday, May 30, 2011

Recently a lady lecturer was detained by the Islamabad Airport Police for an entire night. Her crime: she dared question the driving etiquette of a major of the Pakistan Army who called the Islamabad Military Police and ordered her arrest without charge or FIR. Lady constables only arrived at the scene after the media learnt about the incident the following morning. When asked under what law the lecturer was kept in custody all night, the SHO of the airport police station, Rawalpindi, only smiled. The woman had written an application of protest the night of her arrest; it was made part of her record but was retracted the next morning when both parties ‘agreed’ not to proceed further with the disagreement.

The incident has caught the imagination of a public which has long complained of the tendency of armed forces officers to step out of line with civilians. There have been occasions in the past too where personnel from the armed forces violated discipline and chose to take the law into their own hands on strictly personal grounds. This tendency must not be condoned by the top brass who need to take swift and firm action against those who abuse their positions. Incidents of this nature can only harm the image of the armed forces, already taking a bruising following the recent events in Abbottabad and Karachi. The public belief, right or wrong, that the armed forces can get away with anything without being taken to task must be countered by strong action and accountability. This is as true of major national debacles such as the Osama affair and the PNS Mehran attack as it is of acts by individual officers, such as the recent incident involving the lady lecturer. The nature and seriousness of these incidents may be very different but the common denominator is often the same: many army officers consider any check on even genuine transgressions a personal affront and get away with anything with little more than the conviction that they just can. In these difficult times, the army urgently needs to tackle this impression. As things stand today, major attitudinal changes are required – quite apart from changes in the army’s institutional thinking – to strengthen people’s trust.
 
.
^^ reading above I have now decided to settle down in UK, what is the process?
 
.
they were not terrorists they were people who fought to defend their land to get rid of foreign forces -
We're talking BEFORE the Soviet invasion.

It was Brzezinski & Carter -
conspiracy theory.
A simple "No, I won't even try!" would have sufficed.

My humble request to Indians first solve the problems of minorities in your country and stop killing them than ask us
If India solved every minority problem it had today that would do nothing to stop Pakistan from sending "infiltrators" (as the U.N. termed them in 1965) into India to act out the role themselves.
 
.
...I used to [be] one who never lost the opportunity to contribute to groups "working" to free the captives of Kashmir -
One of the tasks the ISI began by the 1990s was to eliminate the militants calling for Kashmir's independence. The ISI only wanted to support groups calling for Kashmir's integration with Pakistan under its unlawful aegis - which is another form of slavery, of course. Do you know where your money went?
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom