What's new

Major Gaurav Arya's Tweet and Response by Turkish Politician

Wrong.

Pakistanis (subcontinent Muslims who followed Jinnah) never supported the Khilafat Movement.

Only Indians (subcontinent Hindus who followed Gandhi ji and subcontinent Muslims who followed Abul Kalam Azad) supported the Khilafat Movement.



Pakistanis (subcontinent Muslims who followed Jinnah) never supported the Khilafat Movement.

Only Indians (subcontinent Hindus who followed Gandhi ji and subcontinent Muslims who followed Abul Kalam Azad) supported the Khilafat Movement.




Sure sure and you have so much overwhelming genuine and credible evidence to support those claims........:lol:
 
Government of Pakistan and Pakistanis should weigh in and provide clarification on why Lahore Stadium was renamed as Gaddafi Stadium. :D


Shut up and go watch republic TV. Stop spreading baseless propaganda.

I know India is in deep economic trouble and millions of BJP IT cell sanghis like you are out of money and dying of hunger, but don't ruin this forum with shitty posts. This is not WhatsApp.
 

Attachments

  • image.png
    image.png
    455 bytes · Views: 19
They have fooled the world for long. Now they are only fooling themselves. Every one hates them both at regional and international level.


The reality is coming out. India is being converted into Hindu facist regime.
Funny part is their propaganda has turned inwards. While the world is calling out their bullshit they have actually started to believe their own crap. What a sad bunch.lol.
 
Jinnah was an out and out liberal and secularist.

Supporting Khilafat movement was always as NO NO for Jinnah.

Jinnah was liberal and secular for most part of his life but he did change his course in later part of his political career. For me Jinnah was very visionary. He saw way before his time though he did not last very long after partition.
 
Only half of the Muslims followed Jinnah. The other half of the Muslims did not follow Jinnah (including his family) and stayed back in India.

Who the f you to say they all stayed back for them. Most had no means to move. Looking back they would have risked life and limb and moved after knowing you were genocidal maniacs.
 
Who the f you to say they all stayed back for them. Most had no means to move. Looking back they would have risked life and limb and moved after knowing you were genocidal maniacs.

The Indo-Pak borders were open until 1965 war. Indian Muslims had a lot of time to move to Pakistan but they did not as they love India more than Pakistan. That's a cold hard fact.

I already told you Gadaffi assisted in the developement of Pakistan's nuclear program in the 70s, so they named the stadium after him.

Then you should also know that Gadaffi said that Pakistan is a state dictated by the US. :D
 
The Indo-Pak borders were open until 1965 war. Indian Muslims had a lot of time to move to Pakistan but they did not as they love India more than Pakistan. That's a cold hard fact.



Then you should also know that Gadaffi said that Pakistan is a state dictated by the US. :D

Probably because Gen. Zia ul Haq ended all Libyan presence and cooperation in Pakistan when he came to power. Now how exactly is that relevant?
 
Fact Check:

Pakistanis did not support Khilafat Movement.

Only Indians supported the Khilafat Movement.
Wrong. The "secular republic of India" did not exist at that time. The "India" you refer to was merely the artificial British construct held together under the colonial Raj.

Pakistanis are indeed the legacy of those specific individuals - that you call them "Indian" is inaccurate in this context and also irrelevant to the conclusion:

The khilafat movement and its natural descendants has always stood together with our Turkish brothers.

Indian Muslims will soon wake up and likewise seize their rightful destiny, much as we already have. Be ready for this.
 
Probably because Gen. Zia ul Haq ended all Libyan presence and cooperation in Pakistan when he came to power. Now how exactly is that relevant?

It is interesting that the Stadium still carries his name even after the relations went sour.

Also, all the African countries, where he sponsored roads and buildings, have renamed to get rid of his name but his name remains in Pakistan.

What is the scoop?
 
The Indo-Pak borders were open until 1965 war. Indian Muslims had a lot of time to move to Pakistan but they did not as they love India more than Pakistan. That's a cold hard fact.



Then you should also know that Gadaffi said that Pakistan is a state dictated by the US. :D

Anyone can see all you posts are your bs opinions presented as facts. That's your troll role on this site. Poor job
 
Back
Top Bottom