LOL ... anyways China develop well, not behind others.
What does that even mean ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL ... anyways China develop well, not behind others.
It's from some blog & plz don't take indian media seriously even we don't take them seriously here,we call them prestitutes ,many of the media outlets here are owned by westerners & they will have certain bias toward CCPYou only have to look at the title of this thread. "Look out China". This is sure to attract attention.
Let's look at the history of India’s aircraft carrier program and you will see what I mean.
INS Vikrant (1961 to 1997) - This was India first aircraft carrier. This was a brand new zero mileage aircraft carrier with catapult launch and has an angle deck which at that time was an advance design. It operated the Seahawk which at that time was a very successful aircraft carrier based fighter.
So it was fair to say this aircraft carrier capability was pretty much comparable with the best in the world at that timeframe ie 1960s and 70s. This was a good opportunity to learn and master aircraft carrier technologies.
However, India did not learn or master any of the aircraft carrier technology like the catapult, the arrestor landing and the aircraft carrier based fighter.
INS Viraat (1987 to 2020) – This is India’s second aircraft carrier. Now this was first launch in 1945 for the Royal Navy so it was even launch earlier than India’s first aircraft carrier INS Vikrant ! So what India got was a second hand, hand down aircraft carrier with a ski ramp instead of catapult launch. Its capability thus fell behind the catapult launch carrier but still quite capable. Today it’s the decrepitated aircraft carrier I had earlier mention.
Now it get worst.
INS Vikramaditya (2013) – This is India’s third aircraft carrier. Not only is this another second hand, hand down aircraft carrier, it’s not even an aircraft carrier but originally a helicopter carrier. It has no blast shield, it is small with its infrastructure located near the center and its elevators located in the center blocking landing operations. Only one elevator can fit the MIG29. Its bridge control room looks like something from the 1980s. Even INS Vikramaditya soonwill be dock again for a refit to add an air defense.
So today, after over 50 years of operating aircraft carriers, India only have one modified helicopter carrier (Not counting that decrepitated INS Viraat ).
Now for their next carrier, India is building themselves a brand new INS Vikrant using whatever available ship building infrastructure and skilled workers that they have. And India still have to buy all the aircraft carrier technologies. The fact that a very critical and expensive imported gearbox got damaged beyond repair during transporting shows the lack of skill workers or robust lifting capability. It also was funny that their new INS Vikrant had to be floated out of the dry dock three times. Yes three times. Just so another ship could use the dry dock.
China didn't copy Russia coz our Economy & Military Expenditure already surpass Russia as world N.o2 ... and China development also can't copy by others.What does that even mean ?
Just ignore troll he has been banned many times & come up with new ID every timeChina didn't copy Russia coz our Economy & Military Expenditure already surpass Russia as world N.o2 ... and China development also can't copy by others.
China didn't copy Russia coz our Economy & Military Expenditure already surpass Russia as world N.o2 ... and China development also can't copy by others.
Just ignore troll he has been banned many times & come up with new ID every time
you forgot the "I" in indiandia hopes to build its own indigenous nuclear-powered aircraft carrier—complete with electromagnetic catapults—with the cooperation of the United States. In recent years, Washington and New Delhi have drawn closer together in the maritime security realm, due in part to China’s more expansive maneuvering in both the Pacific and Indian Oceans.
Okay, our great India will build another boat with helps from American ... just as u said.Sounds like one of those typical loud mouth chinese boasts to me, but How is that relevant to the topic ?
Okay, our great India will build another boat with helps from American ... ur great india.
Keep going, my friend ... such Arrogance & Ignorance like u will hurt India badly. Keep going ... China never mind.LOL. Who told you that ?
Are you a clown ?
Keep going, my friend ... such Arrogance & Ignorance like u will hurt India badly. Keep going ... China never mind.
I earning much more than that, poor man. Well that sounds like u gave some $hit to China in 1962.LOL......... and you keep on earning that 50 cent too boy.
One of these days you will find someone who gives a $hit if china minds
I enjoy Russia Mig-29k ? Come on, im tired of Mig-29 coz most lost in war. Many Mig-29 shot down during recent 30-year aircombat.Are you a clown ? Then you might enjoy this.
I enjoy Russia Mig-29k ? Come on, im tired of Mig-29 coz most lost in war.
Let's I accept your claim, but Chinese Achivement is not its equipment is helping British building their A.C, but providing it at cheapest cost otherwise many countries have this capablities but not at you cost, whereas what US can provide nobody else can provide it at any cost LIKE (EMALS)Only Indian do believe Chinese achievements support from Russia, coz u just living in India not in China, even though 'Made in China' equipment help British building their A.C in Britain.
This line dosent suit on CHINA, plz take care abt it for future.China didn't copy Russia coz our Economy & Military Expenditure already surpass Russia as world N.o2 ... and China development also can't copy by others.
My firend, let me show u some truth here , a 'copy' country can not do like China.
U.S DoD released: 2015 ASiA-PACIFIC Maritime Security Strategy
View attachment 279743 View attachment 279744
Let's I accept your claim, but Chinese Achivement is not its equipment is helping British building their A.C, but providing it at cheapest cost otherwise many countries have this capablities but not at you cost, whereas what US can provide nobody else can provide it at any cost LIKE (EMALS)
.