Tshering22
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2010
- Messages
- 18,431
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Guys, isn't the AK-200 the latest variant?
Check this out:
Check this out:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Guys, isn't the AK-200 the latest variant?
Check this out:
Guys, isn't the AK-200 the latest variant?
Check this out:
AK 74u
Although old news I will add my 2 cents: the IA operates the INSAS rifle as its standard issue assault rifle, that isn't about to chance until the F-INSAS mulitcalbre assault rifle comes into service (whenever that may be). However the IA does operate the AK in CI ops in J&K and NE where the AK packs a "bigger punch" so this development may be used to replace the old 47 with the AK-103s. Also many police/paramilitaries are now using the AK series including the DP and MP along with the IN MARCOs who have been spotted with the AK-103 in the past, but since adapting the Tavor-21 as their standard assault rifle recently I am unsure whether they still use it.
New Recruit
the main reason of going 2wards AK-103 from INSAS is the reliability.During the Kargil conflict the rifle encountered some reliability problems in the very cold climate in which that conflict took place. Due to the cold weather, the rifle would jam occasionally and the polymer magazines would crack.There were also cases where the rifle would fire on full automatic, while in three-round burst fire mode.As the indian army is phasing out da unlicensed revrsed engineered copy of the famous Belgian FN FAL known as 1A SLR it needs a new service rifle.so whilst the INSAS is being improved they some punch rifle.in my point of view,the indian r just wasting money.try 2 improve ur indeginious INSAS instead of wstin money on others.insas can develop into a mature rifle and can prove it self like JF-17 has to.